On-ice results
Sequence xG (sxGF%) Leaders
2023-24Even strengthThrough 82 team games
Plain expected goals add up every shot in a scramble as if each one were a fresh chance, even though only one goal can come out of it. Sequence xG discounts each follow-up attempt by the chance the play was already over: a shot worth 0.30 after a 0.25 rebound counts as 0.30 × 0.75.
That takes about 5.5% out of the league total, but it moves individual players much more: skaters whose lines live on second and third whacks drop, and clean one-shot rush lines rise.
Leader in 2023-24: Zach Hyman (EDM), 63.9% sxGF%.
Sequence xG leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 63.9% | 1,254 | 4.01 | 2.26 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 2 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 62.9% | 1,282 | 4.00 | 2.35 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 3 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 61.8% | 1,515 | 3.73 | 2.31 | 100% |
| 4 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 61.4% | 1,403 | 3.70 | 2.33 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 5 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 60.7% | 978 | 3.08 | 2.00 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 6 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 60.5% | 604 | 3.10 | 2.03 | 54%▲37 |
| 7 | Stefan NoesenFCAR | CAR | 60.4% | 823 | 2.90 | 1.90 | 0.1% |
| 8 | Jalen ChatfieldDCAR | CAR | 60.2% | 1,042 | 2.78 | 1.84 | 4.1%▲3.4 |
| 9 | Ryan Nugent-HopkinsFEDM | EDM | 60.1% | 1,114 | 3.54 | 2.35 | 77%▲15 |
| 10 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 60.1% | 1,444 | 3.43 | 2.28 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 11 | Tommy NovakFNSH | NSH | 59.4% | 837 | 3.10 | 2.11 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 12 | Jesper FastFCAR | CAR | 59.3% | 823 | 2.57 | 1.77 | — |
| 13 | Conor GarlandFVAN | VAN | 58.8% | 1,025 | 2.91 | 2.04 | 10%▲7.4 |
| 14 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 58.7% | 1,115 | 2.81 | 1.98 | 99% |
| 15 | Evan RodriguesFFLA | FLA | 58.6% | 1,035 | 2.73 | 1.93 | 8.3%▲6.5 |
| 16 | William KarlssonFVGK | VGK | 58.5% | 884 | 2.75 | 1.96 | 24%▲20 |
| 17 | Noah CatesFPHI | PHI | 58.2% | 670 | 2.53 | 1.82 | 18%▲15 |
| 18 | Roope HintzFDAL | DAL | 58.2% | 1,031 | 2.91 | 2.09 | 85%▲7.6 |
| 19 | Jordan StaalFCAR | CAR | 57.9% | 1,012 | 2.52 | 1.83 | 20%▲13 |
| 20 | Kevin FialaFLAK | LAK | 57.9% | 1,169 | 2.84 | 2.06 | 67%▼8.4 |
| 21 | Adam LowryFWPG | WPG | 57.7% | 1,063 | 2.58 | 1.89 | 5.7%▲5.5 |
| 22 | Shane PintoFOTT | OTT | 57.7% | 614 | 2.81 | 2.06 | 37%▲22 |
| 23 | Dakota JoshuaFVAN | VAN | 57.7% | 749 | 2.80 | 2.05 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 24 | Jack DruryFCAR | CAR | 57.6% | 795 | 2.53 | 1.87 | 5.6%▲5.4 |
| 25 | Jason RobertsonFDAL | DAL | 57.5% | 1,221 | 2.69 | 1.98 | 100%▲0.5 |
| 26 | Gustav ForslingDFLA | FLA | 57.5% | 1,403 | 2.81 | 2.07 | 42%▲18 |
| 27 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 57.5% | 1,412 | 2.83 | 2.09 | 100%▲4.5 |
| 28 | Arthur KaliyevFLAK | LAK | 57.5% | 523 | 2.82 | 2.08 | — |
| 29 | Jordan EberleFSEA | SEA | 57.5% | 1,116 | 2.83 | 2.10 | 30%▲2.6 |
| 30 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 57.4% | 573 | 2.69 | 2.00 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 31 | Luke EvangelistaFNSH | NSH | 57.3% | 923 | 2.90 | 2.17 | 70%▲23 |
| 32 | Jaccob SlavinDCAR | CAR | 57.1% | 1,428 | 2.96 | 2.22 | 15%▲3.8 |
| 33 | Warren FoegeleFEDM | EDM | 57.1% | 1,018 | 3.19 | 2.39 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 34 | Nate SchmidtDWPG | WPG | 57.1% | 908 | 2.40 | 1.80 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 35 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 57.0% | 1,301 | 3.16 | 2.38 | 99% |
| 36 | Artemi PanarinFNYR | NYR | 57.0% | 1,300 | 3.25 | 2.46 | 98%▼1.2 |
| 37 | Jordan MartinookFCAR | CAR | 56.9% | 1,057 | 2.48 | 1.87 | 4.3%▲2.7 |
| 38 | Seth JarvisFCAR | CAR | 56.9% | 1,084 | 2.70 | 2.04 | 95%▲1.5 |
| 39 | Ryan McLeodFEDM | EDM | 56.9% | 998 | 2.94 | 2.23 | 26%▲20 |
| 40 | Jonathan DrouinFCOL | COL | 56.8% | 1,115 | 3.00 | 2.28 | 0.5% |
| 41 | Derek ForbortDBOS | BOS | 56.8% | 505 | 2.66 | 2.02 | 0.0% |
| 42 | Nikolaj EhlersFWPG | WPG | 56.8% | 1,089 | 2.94 | 2.23 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 43 | Wyatt JohnstonFDAL | DAL | 56.8% | 1,103 | 2.72 | 2.07 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 44 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 56.8% | 1,307 | 3.42 | 2.61 | 100% |
| 45 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 56.7% | 1,071 | 3.13 | 2.38 | 73%▲1 |
| 46 | Ryan McDonaghDNSH | NSH | 56.7% | 1,291 | 2.92 | 2.23 | 7.3%▲6.8 |
| 47 | Jake GuentzelFPIT/CAR | PIT/CAR | 56.7% | 1,058 | 3.59 | 2.74 | 100% |
| 48 | Pius SuterFVAN | VAN | 56.6% | 824 | 2.40 | 1.84 | 4.1%▲3.3 |
| 49 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 56.5% | 1,222 | 3.16 | 2.43 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 50 | Dmitry OrlovDCAR | CAR | 56.5% | 1,294 | 2.62 | 2.02 | 35%▲21 |
| 51 | Aaron EkbladDFLA | FLA | 56.5% | 819 | 2.73 | 2.10 | 50%▲34 |
| 52 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 56.4% | 1,638 | 2.88 | 2.22 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 53 | Oliver Ekman-LarssonDFLA | FLA | 56.4% | 1,172 | 2.75 | 2.13 | 43%▲32 |
| 54 | Matt BoldyFMIN | MIN | 56.4% | 1,078 | 2.86 | 2.21 | 100% |
| 55 | Trevor MooreFLAK | LAK | 56.2% | 1,145 | 2.80 | 2.18 | 9.1% |
| 56 | Sam BennettFFLA | FLA | 56.2% | 942 | 3.22 | 2.51 | 83%▲4 |
| 57 | Tyler BertuzziFTOR | TOR | 56.2% | 1,123 | 3.07 | 2.39 | 62%▼3.2 |
| 58 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 56.2% | 1,079 | 3.26 | 2.54 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 59 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 56.2% | 1,124 | 3.03 | 2.36 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 60 | Jesper BrattFNJD | NJD | 56.1% | 1,165 | 3.11 | 2.44 | 96%▲11 |
| 61 | Nino NiederreiterFWPG | WPG | 56.0% | 987 | 2.53 | 1.99 | 4.0%▲3.8 |
| 62 | Ondrej PalatFNJD | NJD | 56.0% | 940 | 2.87 | 2.26 | 0.1% |
| 63 | Quinn HughesDVAN | VAN | 56.0% | 1,596 | 2.81 | 2.21 | 100% |
| 64 | Ben HuttonDVGK | VGK | 55.9% | 601 | 2.46 | 1.94 | — |
| 65 | Calvin de HaanDTBL | TBL | 55.9% | 857 | 2.33 | 1.84 | — |
| 66 | Brett KulakDEDM | EDM | 55.9% | 1,174 | 2.65 | 2.09 | 0.3% |
| 67 | Garnet HathawayFPHI | PHI | 55.8% | 876 | 2.23 | 1.77 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 68 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 55.8% | 884 | 2.82 | 2.23 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 69 | Vincent TrocheckFNYR | NYR | 55.8% | 1,284 | 3.09 | 2.45 | 88%▼5.5 |
| 70 | Brandon HagelFTBL | TBL | 55.7% | 1,254 | 3.00 | 2.38 | 100%▲1.9 |
| 71 | Craig SmithFDAL | DAL | 55.7% | 751 | 2.36 | 1.87 | — |
| 72 | Brent BurnsDCAR | CAR | 55.7% | 1,315 | 2.87 | 2.28 | 50%▼14 |
| 73 | Phillip DanaultFLAK | LAK | 55.7% | 1,092 | 2.75 | 2.19 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 74 | Sonny MilanoFWSH | WSH | 55.7% | 561 | 2.51 | 2.00 | — |
| 75 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 55.6% | 1,349 | 3.25 | 2.60 | 100% |
| 76 | James van RiemsdykFBOS | BOS | 55.5% | 769 | 2.80 | 2.24 | 0.3% |
| 77 | Valeri NichushkinFCOL | COL | 55.5% | 820 | 2.96 | 2.37 | 60% |
| 78 | Alexis LafrenièreFNYR | NYR | 55.5% | 1,271 | 3.10 | 2.48 | 82%▲13 |
| 79 | Mark GiordanoDTOR | TOR | 55.5% | 631 | 2.77 | 2.22 | — |
| 80 | Kirill KaprizovFMIN | MIN | 55.4% | 1,254 | 2.90 | 2.33 | 98%▼0.8 |
| 81 | Mikko RantanenFCOL | COL | 55.4% | 1,413 | 3.04 | 2.45 | 99%▲0.7 |
| 82 | Ilya MikheyevFVAN | VAN | 55.4% | 962 | 2.55 | 2.06 | 8.4%▲6.8 |
| 83 | Nils HoglanderFVAN | VAN | 55.3% | 914 | 2.37 | 1.91 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 84 | Alex IafalloFWPG | WPG | 55.3% | 988 | 2.38 | 1.93 | 4.3%▲3 |
| 85 | Thomas HarleyDDAL | DAL | 55.3% | 1,466 | 2.74 | 2.22 | 88%▲8.9 |
| 86 | John TavaresFTOR | TOR | 55.3% | 1,134 | 2.90 | 2.34 | 96%▲9.3 |
| 87 | Adam FoxDNYR | NYR | 55.3% | 1,274 | 2.67 | 2.16 | 99%▲6.5 |
| 88 | Jesper BoqvistFBOS | BOS | 55.2% | 511 | 2.24 | 1.82 | 0.1% |
| 89 | Cale MakarDCOL | COL | 55.2% | 1,354 | 2.73 | 2.22 | 100%▲1 |
| 90 | Devon ToewsDCOL | COL | 55.0% | 1,521 | 2.74 | 2.24 | 60%▼2.3 |
| 91 | Quinton ByfieldFLAK | LAK | 55.0% | 1,089 | 2.42 | 1.99 | 86%▲18 |
| 92 | Esa LindellDDAL | DAL | 54.9% | 1,347 | 2.71 | 2.22 | 37%▼32 |
| 93 | Mitch MarnerFTOR | TOR | 54.9% | 1,052 | 2.87 | 2.36 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 94 | Ian ColeDVAN | VAN | 54.8% | 1,215 | 2.36 | 1.95 | 4.9%▲4.3 |
| 95 | Roman JosiDNSH | NSH | 54.7% | 1,597 | 2.96 | 2.45 | 98% |
| 96 | Dmitry KulikovDFLA | FLA | 54.7% | 1,069 | 2.48 | 2.05 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 97 | Joel Eriksson EkFMIN | MIN | 54.7% | 1,040 | 2.76 | 2.28 | 82%▲11 |
| 98 | Mattias JanmarkFEDM | EDM | 54.7% | 708 | 2.41 | 2.00 | 0.0% |
| 99 | Teddy BluegerFVAN | VAN | 54.6% | 837 | 2.59 | 2.15 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 100 | Jamie BennFDAL | DAL | 54.6% | 918 | 2.75 | 2.29 | 22%▲18 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 327 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Read it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
How reliable is it?
Shares the stability of on-ice xGF%. The flurry discount itself is mechanical (no fitted parameters), so it adds no noise.
How Sequence xG is calculated →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 xGF%50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
- Shot DietExpected goals per unblocked attempt. League average is about 0.06-0.07; 0.10+ is an elite diet.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.