On-ice results
5v5 Expected Goals Share (xGF%) Leaders
2025-265-on-5Through 82 team games
Expected goals share is the best single on-ice number for "does the play tilt toward the right net when this player is out there?" It weighs every unblocked shot attempt by its chance of scoring, so a point shot through traffic counts for less than a backdoor tap-in.
The board ranks the share, not the raw total, and uses only 5-on-5 play, where every team has the same number of skaters. Rows below the ice-time minimum are hidden; it rises as the season goes on.
Leader in 2025-26: Jordan Spence (OTT), 62.6% xGF%.
5v5 xGF% leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan SpenceDOTT | OTT | 62.6% | 1,212 | 3.24 | 1.94 | 21%▲17 |
| 2 | Sam MalinskiDCOL | COL | 62.1% | 1,322 | 3.30 | 2.01 | 56%▲33 |
| 3 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 61.7% | 803 | 3.23 | 2.00 | 93%▲9 |
| 4 | Jordan KyrouFSTL | STL | 61.6% | 923 | 3.18 | 1.98 | 79%▲2.9 |
| 5 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 61.0% | 751 | 3.36 | 2.15 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 6 | Mark JankowskiFCAR | CAR | 60.5% | 656 | 2.63 | 1.71 | 0.2% |
| 7 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 60.0% | 1,081 | 3.42 | 2.28 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 8 | Brock NelsonFCOL | COL | 60.0% | 1,085 | 3.38 | 2.25 | 87%▼4 |
| 9 | Brandon HagelFTBL | TBL | 59.8% | 985 | 3.81 | 2.56 | 100%▲1.9 |
| 10 | Devon ToewsDCOL | COL | 59.8% | 1,189 | 3.49 | 2.35 | 60%▼2.3 |
| 11 | Valeri NichushkinFCOL | COL | 59.8% | 948 | 3.37 | 2.27 | 60% |
| 12 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 59.6% | 1,313 | 3.83 | 2.59 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 13 | Jack DruryFCOL | COL | 59.5% | 978 | 2.63 | 1.79 | 5.6%▲5.4 |
| 14 | Shayne GostisbehereDCAR | CAR | 59.4% | 827 | 3.28 | 2.24 | 96%▲16 |
| 15 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 59.4% | 998 | 3.56 | 2.44 | 54%▲37 |
| 16 | Dylan CozensFOTT | OTT | 59.3% | 1,053 | 2.99 | 2.05 | 90%▲3.6 |
| 17 | William CarrierFCAR | CAR | 58.8% | 741 | 2.61 | 1.83 | 0.1% |
| 18 | Logan StankovenFCAR | CAR | 58.6% | 1,089 | 3.42 | 2.42 | 67%▲42 |
| 19 | Gabriel LandeskogFCOL | COL | 58.5% | 793 | 3.56 | 2.52 | 50%▲32 |
| 20 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 58.4% | 1,432 | 3.43 | 2.44 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 21 | Danton HeinenFCBJ/PIT | CBJ/PIT | 58.4% | 498 | 2.49 | 1.77 | 0.0% |
| 22 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 58.3% | 1,466 | 3.47 | 2.48 | 100% |
| 23 | Claude GirouxFOTT | OTT | 58.1% | 979 | 2.84 | 2.04 | 30%▲20 |
| 24 | Ross ColtonFCOL | COL | 58.1% | 842 | 3.20 | 2.31 | 8.1%▲7.8 |
| 25 | Parker KellyFCOL | COL | 58.0% | 852 | 2.59 | 1.88 | 11%▲5.7 |
| 26 | Jackson BlakeFCAR | CAR | 57.7% | 1,097 | 3.41 | 2.50 | 68%▲21 |
| 27 | Shea TheodoreDVGK | VGK | 57.4% | 1,283 | 2.94 | 2.18 | 91%▲28 |
| 28 | Gage GoncalvesFTBL | TBL | 57.4% | 857 | 2.72 | 2.02 | 11%▲11 |
| 29 | Ivan BarbashevFVGK | VGK | 57.3% | 1,213 | 3.14 | 2.33 | 67%▲26 |
| 30 | Hendrix LapierreFWSH | WSH | 57.3% | 638 | 2.77 | 2.06 | 7.3%▲7.2 |
| 31 | Cale MakarDCOL | COL | 57.3% | 1,300 | 3.20 | 2.39 | 100%▲1 |
| 32 | Robert ThomasFSTL | STL | 57.2% | 899 | 3.16 | 2.36 | 93%▲20 |
| 33 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 57.2% | 1,115 | 3.58 | 2.68 | 100% |
| 34 | Clayton KellerFUTA | UTA | 57.1% | 1,208 | 3.09 | 2.31 | 100%▲2 |
| 35 | Roope HintzFDAL | DAL | 57.1% | 669 | 2.61 | 1.96 | 85%▲7.6 |
| 36 | Mitch MarnerFVGK | VGK | 57.0% | 1,107 | 2.81 | 2.11 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 37 | Anthony CirelliFTBL | TBL | 57.0% | 874 | 3.48 | 2.62 | 51%▲19 |
| 38 | Kaedan KorczakDVGK | VGK | 57.0% | 1,186 | 2.70 | 2.04 | 6.7%▲6.5 |
| 39 | Joel NystromDCAR | CAR | 57.0% | 522 | 3.18 | 2.40 | 4.0%▲4 |
| 40 | Jake SandersonDOTT | OTT | 57.0% | 1,139 | 2.74 | 2.07 | 99%▲3.2 |
| 41 | Josh MansonDCOL | COL | 56.9% | 1,212 | 2.97 | 2.25 | 32%▲16 |
| 42 | K'Andre MillerDCAR | CAR | 56.9% | 1,332 | 3.08 | 2.34 | 64%▲26 |
| 43 | Noah HanifinDVGK | VGK | 56.8% | 1,347 | 2.75 | 2.09 | 52%▼23 |
| 44 | Martin NecasFCOL | COL | 56.8% | 1,269 | 3.45 | 2.62 | 100%▲1.3 |
| 45 | Samuel GirardDCOL/PIT | COL/PIT | 56.7% | 1,003 | 3.00 | 2.29 | 8.2%▲7.8 |
| 46 | Denver BarkeyFPHI | PHI | 56.7% | 497 | 2.58 | 1.97 | 15%▲14 |
| 47 | Charle-Edouard D'AstousDTBL | TBL | 56.6% | 1,153 | 2.78 | 2.13 | 22%▲17 |
| 48 | Taylor HallFCAR | CAR | 56.5% | 1,002 | 3.28 | 2.52 | 28%▲21 |
| 49 | Drake BathersonFOTT | OTT | 56.5% | 1,039 | 2.84 | 2.18 | 97%▲7.4 |
| 50 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 56.5% | 1,389 | 3.55 | 2.73 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 51 | Nikolaj EhlersFCAR | CAR | 56.5% | 1,045 | 3.00 | 2.31 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 52 | Fabian ZetterlundFOTT | OTT | 56.5% | 940 | 2.94 | 2.26 | 13%▲6.6 |
| 53 | Thomas ChabotDOTT | OTT | 56.4% | 997 | 3.01 | 2.32 | 83%▼11 |
| 54 | Darren RaddyshDTBL | TBL | 56.4% | 1,230 | 3.03 | 2.34 | 100%▲3.5 |
| 55 | Jason RobertsonFDAL | DAL | 56.4% | 1,230 | 3.07 | 2.37 | 100%▲0.5 |
| 56 | Maxwell CrozierDTBL | TBL | 56.4% | 503 | 2.70 | 2.09 | 5.6%▲5.5 |
| 57 | Eric RobinsonFCAR | CAR | 56.4% | 684 | 2.67 | 2.06 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 58 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 56.4% | 1,094 | 2.67 | 2.07 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 59 | Damon SeversonDCBJ | CBJ | 56.3% | 1,319 | 2.92 | 2.27 | 9.4%▲6.2 |
| 60 | Barrett HaytonFUTA | UTA | 56.3% | 821 | 2.81 | 2.19 | 11%▲11 |
| 61 | Michael CarconeFUTA | UTA | 56.2% | 915 | 2.91 | 2.27 | 5.0%▲4 |
| 62 | Kailer YamamotoFUTA | UTA | 56.2% | 661 | 2.63 | 2.05 | 0.2% |
| 63 | Adam FoxDNYR | NYR | 56.2% | 1,014 | 2.71 | 2.11 | 99%▲6.5 |
| 64 | Nick CousinsFOTT | OTT | 56.2% | 916 | 2.44 | 1.90 | 0.1% |
| 65 | Sean WalkerDCAR | CAR | 56.1% | 1,458 | 3.01 | 2.35 | 60%▼11 |
| 66 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 56.1% | 1,331 | 2.65 | 2.07 | 100%▲4.5 |
| 67 | Brayden McNabbDVGK | VGK | 56.1% | 1,092 | 2.76 | 2.16 | 23%▲20 |
| 68 | Lane HutsonDMTL | MTL | 55.9% | 1,505 | 3.07 | 2.42 | 99%▲3.1 |
| 69 | Nick SchmaltzFUTA | UTA | 55.8% | 1,162 | 2.88 | 2.28 | 94%▲4.7 |
| 70 | Ben HuttonDVGK | VGK | 55.8% | 782 | 2.78 | 2.20 | — |
| 71 | Mike ReillyDCAR | CAR | 55.8% | 568 | 2.96 | 2.34 | 0.1% |
| 72 | Mackie SamoskevichFFLA | FLA | 55.7% | 925 | 2.79 | 2.22 | — |
| 73 | Brandon SaadFVGK | VGK | 55.7% | 598 | 2.77 | 2.21 | — |
| 74 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 55.6% | 889 | 3.54 | 2.82 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 75 | Jaccob SlavinDCAR | CAR | 55.6% | 664 | 2.74 | 2.19 | 15%▲3.8 |
| 76 | Tommy NovakFPIT | PIT | 55.6% | 1,021 | 3.28 | 2.62 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 77 | Leo CarlssonFANA | ANA | 55.4% | 948 | 3.25 | 2.62 | 94%▲10 |
| 78 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 55.3% | 1,041 | 3.20 | 2.58 | 100% |
| 79 | David PerronFOTT/DET | OTT/DET | 55.3% | 741 | 2.40 | 1.94 | 0.2% |
| 80 | Nate SchmidtDUTA | UTA | 55.3% | 1,361 | 2.93 | 2.37 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 81 | Troy TerryFANA | ANA | 55.3% | 805 | 3.14 | 2.54 | 47%▲34 |
| 82 | Brent BurnsDCOL | COL | 55.3% | 1,269 | 3.02 | 2.45 | 50%▼14 |
| 83 | J.J. MoserDTBL | TBL | 55.2% | 1,407 | 3.03 | 2.46 | 22%▲20 |
| 84 | Dylan HollowayFSTL | STL | 55.2% | 863 | 2.99 | 2.43 | 95%▲9.2 |
| 85 | Tomas HertlFVGK | VGK | 55.2% | 1,025 | 2.72 | 2.21 | 83%▲2.9 |
| 86 | Mavrik BourqueFDAL | DAL | 55.2% | 1,129 | 2.76 | 2.24 | 35%▲31 |
| 87 | John MarinoDUTA | UTA | 55.2% | 1,424 | 2.77 | 2.25 | 18%▲13 |
| 88 | Jake GuentzelFTBL | TBL | 55.2% | 1,107 | 3.07 | 2.50 | 100% |
| 89 | Tom WilsonFWSH | WSH | 55.1% | 961 | 3.03 | 2.47 | 95%▲6.5 |
| 90 | Tim StützleFOTT | OTT | 55.1% | 1,083 | 2.97 | 2.42 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 91 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 55.1% | 1,051 | 3.38 | 2.75 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 92 | Zach WerenskiDCBJ | CBJ | 55.0% | 1,551 | 3.00 | 2.46 | 100% |
| 93 | Pontus HolmbergFTBL | TBL | 55.0% | 897 | 2.33 | 1.91 | 0.1% |
| 94 | Chris KreiderFANA | ANA | 55.0% | 935 | 3.13 | 2.56 | 62%▲29 |
| 95 | Josh NorrisFBUF | BUF | 55.0% | 514 | 2.86 | 2.35 | 39%▲32 |
| 96 | Esa LindellDDAL | DAL | 54.9% | 1,439 | 2.53 | 2.08 | 37%▼32 |
| 97 | Trevor ZegrasFPHI | PHI | 54.9% | 1,175 | 3.02 | 2.48 | 86%▲19 |
| 98 | Jesper BrattFNJD | NJD | 54.8% | 1,139 | 3.17 | 2.61 | 96%▲11 |
| 99 | Ryan McDonaghDTBL | TBL | 54.8% | 731 | 2.54 | 2.10 | 7.3%▲6.8 |
| 100 | Drew DoughtyDLAK | LAK | 54.7% | 1,335 | 2.49 | 2.06 | 21%▲11 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 338 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
How reliable is it?
On-ice xGF% is moderately repeatable: split-half r ≈ 0.29 at about 7 xG per half. Treat gaps of 2-3 points between players as noise before about 500 minutes.
How our expected goals model works →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.
- Sequence xGRead it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.