Lines, pairs and power-play units
Forward Line xGF% Leaders (5v5)
2025-265-on-5Through 82 team games
The same exact-trio lines as the CF% board, rated on expected goals instead of raw attempts. A line that wins the shot count from the outside but gives up the slot will look much worse here.
Expected goals only exist for games our engine has processed, so the time-together column counts those games only.
Leader in 2025-26: Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid (EDM), 69.2% xGF%.
Line xGF% leaderboard
| # | Line | Team | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavidEDM | EDM | 69.2% | 128 | 4.41 | 1.96 |
| 2 | Zetterlund – Tkachuk – StützleOTT | OTT | 68.8% | 132 | 4.18 | 1.90 |
| 3 | Nelson – Lehkonen – NichushkinCOL | COL | 68.6% | 121 | 3.60 | 1.65 |
| 4 | Tuch – McLeod – DoanBUF | BUF | 68.4% | 100 | 4.64 | 2.14 |
| 5 | Hintz – Robertson – BourqueDAL | DAL | 67.3% | 184 | 3.82 | 1.85 |
| 6 | Fiala – Turcotte – KuzmenkoLAK | LAK | 67.2% | 135 | 3.87 | 1.89 |
| 7 | Kelly – Drury – KivirantaCOL | COL | 66.6% | 172 | 3.29 | 1.65 |
| 8 | Olofsson – Colton – DruryCOL | COL | 66.4% | 111 | 3.40 | 1.72 |
| 9 | Hall – Jankowski – RobinsonCAR | CAR | 65.5% | 110 | 3.50 | 1.84 |
| 10 | Tkachuk – Cozens – GreigOTT | OTT | 65.0% | 319 | 3.52 | 1.89 |
| 11 | Jankowski – Carrier – RobinsonCAR | CAR | 64.9% | 131 | 3.22 | 1.74 |
| 12 | Acciari – Dewar – SoderblomPIT | PIT | 64.7% | 110 | 3.17 | 1.73 |
| 13 | Kucherov – Point – GoncalvesTBL | TBL | 64.4% | 123 | 4.11 | 2.28 |
| 14 | Couturier – Tippett – BarkeyPHI | PHI | 63.3% | 159 | 3.09 | 1.79 |
| 15 | Stone – Barbashev – EichelVGK | VGK | 62.9% | 334 | 3.87 | 2.28 |
| 16 | Rantanen – Robertson – JohnstonDAL | DAL | 62.4% | 115 | 5.07 | 3.05 |
| 17 | Kucherov – Cirelli – HagelTBL | TBL | 62.4% | 314 | 4.63 | 2.79 |
| 18 | Nelson – Landeskog – NichushkinCOL | COL | 62.2% | 141 | 4.50 | 2.73 |
| 19 | Giroux – Batherson – StützleOTT | OTT | 61.9% | 250 | 3.21 | 1.97 |
| 20 | Greer – Rodrigues – SamoskevichFLA | FLA | 61.8% | 140 | 3.13 | 1.93 |
| 21 | Wilson – Protas – SourdifWSH | WSH | 61.7% | 207 | 4.20 | 2.61 |
| 22 | Buchnevich – Kyrou – NeighboursSTL | STL | 61.5% | 193 | 3.25 | 2.04 |
| 23 | Thomas – Holloway – SnuggerudSTL | STL | 61.3% | 230 | 4.20 | 2.65 |
| 24 | Wilson – Dubois – ProtasWSH | WSH | 60.4% | 119 | 3.33 | 2.18 |
| 25 | Schmaltz – Keller – HaytonUTA | UTA | 60.3% | 166 | 3.07 | 2.02 |
| 26 | Yamamoto – Guenther – CooleyUTA | UTA | 60.1% | 116 | 3.95 | 2.62 |
| 27 | Giroux – Amadio – PintoOTT | OTT | 60.0% | 267 | 2.67 | 1.78 |
| 28 | Malkin – Novak – ChinakhovPIT | PIT | 59.6% | 213 | 4.14 | 2.80 |
| 29 | Carcone – McBain – ButUTA | UTA | 59.5% | 123 | 2.72 | 1.85 |
| 30 | Fiala – Byfield – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 59.4% | 107 | 3.83 | 2.62 |
| 31 | Roy – Robertson – CowanTOR | TOR | 59.3% | 101 | 3.13 | 2.15 |
| 32 | Guentzel – Cirelli – HagelTBL | TBL | 59.3% | 116 | 4.32 | 2.96 |
| 33 | Cousins – Amadio – PintoOTT | OTT | 59.1% | 272 | 2.91 | 2.02 |
| 34 | O'Reilly – Forsberg – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 58.9% | 246 | 3.36 | 2.35 |
| 35 | Lehkonen – MacKinnon – NecasCOL | COL | 58.9% | 512 | 4.14 | 2.90 |
| 36 | Ehlers – Stankoven – BlakeCAR | CAR | 58.8% | 203 | 3.66 | 2.56 |
| 37 | Stamkos – O'Reilly – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 58.8% | 232 | 3.77 | 2.64 |
| 38 | Hall – Stankoven – BlakeCAR | CAR | 58.7% | 540 | 3.80 | 2.68 |
| 39 | Schmaltz – Keller – PeterkaUTA | UTA | 58.6% | 162 | 3.85 | 2.72 |
| 40 | Hertl – Marner – DorofeyevVGK | VGK | 58.6% | 252 | 2.71 | 1.92 |
| 41 | Perron – Batherson – CozensOTT | OTT | 58.6% | 127 | 3.12 | 2.21 |
| 42 | Kreider – Terry – CarlssonANA | ANA | 58.4% | 377 | 3.45 | 2.46 |
| 43 | Palat – Bratt – HughesNJD | NJD | 58.3% | 104 | 3.86 | 2.76 |
| 44 | Killorn – Granlund – SenneckeANA | ANA | 58.3% | 258 | 3.22 | 2.31 |
| 45 | Saad – Hertl – DorofeyevVGK | VGK | 58.1% | 123 | 3.09 | 2.23 |
| 46 | Horvat – Barzal – HeinemanNYI | NYI | 58.1% | 125 | 4.18 | 3.01 |
| 47 | Norris – Doan – OstlundBUF | BUF | 58.1% | 121 | 2.88 | 2.08 |
| 48 | Boeser – Garland – KampfVAN | VAN | 58.0% | 106 | 3.31 | 2.40 |
| 49 | Tavares – Maccelli – KniesTOR | TOR | 57.7% | 163 | 2.98 | 2.19 |
| 50 | McCarron – Smith – WiesblattNSH | NSH | 57.7% | 100 | 2.19 | 1.60 |
| 51 | Buchnevich – Thomas – NeighboursSTL | STL | 57.6% | 116 | 3.84 | 2.83 |
| 52 | Viel – Poehling – GauthierANA | ANA | 57.4% | 115 | 3.62 | 2.68 |
| 53 | Zuccarello – Hartman – KaprizovMIN | MIN | 57.3% | 410 | 3.54 | 2.64 |
| 54 | Armia – Laughton – WrightLAK | LAK | 57.3% | 103 | 2.84 | 2.12 |
| 55 | Barbashev – Eichel – BowmanVGK | VGK | 57.1% | 237 | 3.35 | 2.52 |
| 56 | Kopitar – Kempe – PanarinLAK | LAK | 57.0% | 310 | 3.08 | 2.33 |
| 57 | Lowry – Vilardi – PerfettiWPG | WPG | 56.9% | 203 | 2.96 | 2.24 |
| 58 | Ehlers – Aho – JarvisCAR | CAR | 56.7% | 106 | 4.30 | 3.29 |
| 59 | Dowd – Kolesar – SmithVGK | VGK | 56.6% | 117 | 1.97 | 1.51 |
| 60 | Suzuki – Caufield – SlafkovskýMTL | MTL | 56.6% | 477 | 3.60 | 2.76 |
| 61 | Malott – Helenius – WardLAK | LAK | 56.6% | 144 | 2.50 | 1.92 |
| 62 | Schenn – Kyrou – HollowaySTL | STL | 56.4% | 107 | 2.79 | 2.16 |
| 63 | Crouse – Carcone – McBainUTA | UTA | 56.4% | 170 | 3.80 | 2.93 |
| 64 | Jenner – Monahan – JohnsonCBJ | CBJ | 56.4% | 135 | 3.26 | 2.52 |
| 65 | Rantanen – Steel – JohnstonDAL | DAL | 56.3% | 238 | 3.15 | 2.45 |
| 66 | Meier – Hischier – MercerNJD | NJD | 56.1% | 459 | 3.07 | 2.40 |
| 67 | Cates – Brink – MichkovPHI | PHI | 56.0% | 170 | 2.34 | 1.83 |
| 68 | Suzuki – Caufield – BolducMTL | MTL | 56.0% | 169 | 3.31 | 2.60 |
| 69 | Staal – Martinook – EhlersCAR | CAR | 55.9% | 273 | 3.30 | 2.60 |
| 70 | Moore – Byfield – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 55.9% | 256 | 3.40 | 2.68 |
| 71 | Schmaltz – Crouse – KellerUTA | UTA | 55.9% | 348 | 3.21 | 2.53 |
| 72 | Backlund – Coleman – HonzekCGY | CGY | 55.8% | 148 | 2.45 | 1.95 |
| 73 | Jeannot – Kastelic – MintenBOS | BOS | 55.8% | 171 | 2.95 | 2.34 |
| 74 | Bäck – Bourque – HryckowianDAL | DAL | 55.7% | 202 | 2.61 | 2.07 |
| 75 | Dvorak – Konecny – ZegrasPHI | PHI | 55.7% | 243 | 4.76 | 3.79 |
| 76 | Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavidEDM | EDM | 55.6% | 395 | 4.04 | 3.22 |
| 77 | Suzuki – Texier – CaufieldMTL | MTL | 55.6% | 157 | 3.22 | 2.57 |
| 78 | Zucker – McLeod – QuinnBUF | BUF | 55.6% | 429 | 3.53 | 2.82 |
| 79 | Verhaeghe – Bennett – GreerFLA | FLA | 55.6% | 126 | 4.04 | 3.23 |
| 80 | Nelson – Nichushkin – ColtonCOL | COL | 55.5% | 154 | 3.26 | 2.61 |
| 81 | Cizikas – MacLean – GatcombNYI | NYI | 55.4% | 308 | 2.10 | 1.69 |
| 82 | Miller – Sheary – KartyeNYR | NYR | 55.3% | 134 | 3.18 | 2.57 |
| 83 | Landeskog – MacKinnon – NecasCOL | COL | 55.2% | 192 | 4.20 | 3.40 |
| 84 | McDavid – Podkolzin – SavoieEDM | EDM | 55.2% | 107 | 2.75 | 2.23 |
| 85 | Haula – Bunting – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 55.2% | 108 | 3.10 | 2.52 |
| 86 | Gourde – Girgensons – HolmbergTBL | TBL | 54.9% | 619 | 2.32 | 1.90 |
| 87 | Dickinson – Donato – MikheyevCHI | CHI | 54.9% | 163 | 3.17 | 2.61 |
| 88 | Glass – Gritsyuk – HameenahoNJD | NJD | 54.8% | 124 | 2.14 | 1.76 |
| 89 | Giroux – Amadio – GreigOTT | OTT | 54.7% | 108 | 2.69 | 2.23 |
| 90 | Benn – Duchene – SteelDAL | DAL | 54.7% | 137 | 2.98 | 2.47 |
| 91 | Marchment – Marchenko – FantilliCBJ | CBJ | 54.7% | 345 | 3.24 | 2.69 |
| 92 | Staal – Martinook – CarrierCAR | CAR | 54.6% | 263 | 2.91 | 2.42 |
| 93 | Meier – Bratt – HischierNJD | NJD | 54.6% | 123 | 4.37 | 3.64 |
| 94 | Danault – Foegele – MooreLAK | LAK | 54.5% | 149 | 2.24 | 1.87 |
| 95 | Coyle – Olivier – SillingerCBJ | CBJ | 54.5% | 402 | 2.62 | 2.19 |
| 96 | Seguin – Hintz – RobertsonDAL | DAL | 54.4% | 117 | 2.53 | 2.12 |
| 97 | McTavish – Gauthier – SenneckeANA | ANA | 54.4% | 298 | 3.66 | 3.07 |
| 98 | Karlsson – Bains – SassonVAN | VAN | 54.3% | 103 | 3.10 | 2.61 |
| 99 | Kopitar – Kempe – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 54.2% | 112 | 2.61 | 2.20 |
| 100 | Aho – Svechnikov – JarvisCAR | CAR | 54.2% | 553 | 3.40 | 2.87 |
Minimum sample: 98 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 3,091 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.
How reliable is it?
Line samples are small (often 150-400 minutes a season), so expect a few points of noise either way.
How our expected goals model works →