Lines, pairs and power-play units
Forward Line CF% Leaders (5v5)
2025-265-on-5Through 82 team games
Linemates matter more than almost anything else in a forward's numbers, so it helps to rate the unit itself. Every forward trio here is an exact set of three players on the ice together at 5-on-5, detected second by second from the NHL shift charts, not a "usual line" guessed from a depth chart.
Only lines with meaningful time together qualify; the minimum grows with the number of games played.
Leader in 2025-26: Kelly – Drury – Kiviranta (COL), 65.4% CF%.
Line CF% leaderboard
| # | Line | Team | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelly – Drury – KivirantaCOL | COL | 65.4% | 176 | 77.9 | 41.1 |
| 2 | Ehlers – Stankoven – BlakeCAR | CAR | 63.7% | 249 | 71.3 | 40.7 |
| 3 | Nelson – Lehkonen – NichushkinCOL | COL | 63.6% | 131 | 73.6 | 42.1 |
| 4 | Olofsson – Colton – DruryCOL | COL | 63.4% | 123 | 84.6 | 48.9 |
| 5 | Hall – Jankowski – RobinsonCAR | CAR | 63.3% | 127 | 76.7 | 44.5 |
| 6 | Aho – Svechnikov – JarvisCAR | CAR | 63.0% | 580 | 76.2 | 44.7 |
| 7 | Staal – Martinook – CarrierCAR | CAR | 62.4% | 297 | 71.7 | 43.2 |
| 8 | Haula – Bunting – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 62.4% | 123 | 79.9 | 48.3 |
| 9 | Kucherov – Cirelli – HagelTBL | TBL | 62.0% | 340 | 80.1 | 49.1 |
| 10 | Jankowski – Carrier – RobinsonCAR | CAR | 62.0% | 154 | 67.2 | 41.2 |
| 11 | Staal – Martinook – EhlersCAR | CAR | 62.0% | 322 | 72.0 | 44.2 |
| 12 | Zetterlund – Tkachuk – StützleOTT | OTT | 62.0% | 142 | 77.5 | 47.6 |
| 13 | Greer – Rodrigues – SamoskevichFLA | FLA | 61.7% | 147 | 72.2 | 44.9 |
| 14 | Hall – Stankoven – BlakeCAR | CAR | 61.1% | 547 | 74.3 | 47.3 |
| 15 | Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavidEDM | EDM | 61.0% | 138 | 72.3 | 46.2 |
| 16 | O'Reilly – Forsberg – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 60.5% | 275 | 74.1 | 48.4 |
| 17 | Hertl – Marner – DorofeyevVGK | VGK | 60.5% | 265 | 71.7 | 46.8 |
| 18 | Tkachuk – Cozens – GreigOTT | OTT | 60.1% | 319 | 70.5 | 46.8 |
| 19 | Schmaltz – Keller – HaytonUTA | UTA | 60.0% | 182 | 58.3 | 38.9 |
| 20 | Wennberg – Sherwood – EklundSJS | SJS | 60.0% | 149 | 64.0 | 42.7 |
| 21 | Stone – Marner – HowdenVGK | VGK | 60.0% | 103 | 66.6 | 44.4 |
| 22 | Horvat – Barzal – HeinemanNYI | NYI | 59.7% | 131 | 76.3 | 51.5 |
| 23 | Fiala – Turcotte – KuzmenkoLAK | LAK | 59.7% | 144 | 67.9 | 45.8 |
| 24 | Hintz – Robertson – BourqueDAL | DAL | 59.6% | 206 | 71.2 | 48.2 |
| 25 | Saad – Hertl – DorofeyevVGK | VGK | 59.2% | 140 | 67.1 | 46.1 |
| 26 | Carcone – McBain – ButUTA | UTA | 59.2% | 123 | 73.4 | 50.6 |
| 27 | Nelson – Landeskog – NichushkinCOL | COL | 59.2% | 169 | 74.6 | 51.5 |
| 28 | Glass – Gritsyuk – HameenahoNJD | NJD | 59.1% | 124 | 69.4 | 48.0 |
| 29 | Guentzel – Cirelli – HagelTBL | TBL | 59.1% | 124 | 78.8 | 54.6 |
| 30 | Verhaeghe – Bennett – GreerFLA | FLA | 59.0% | 149 | 71.1 | 49.4 |
| 31 | Brown – Glass – GritsyukNJD | NJD | 58.9% | 162 | 63.6 | 44.3 |
| 32 | Tuch – McLeod – DoanBUF | BUF | 58.6% | 109 | 80.3 | 56.6 |
| 33 | Schmaltz – Crouse – KellerUTA | UTA | 58.5% | 358 | 67.1 | 47.6 |
| 34 | Giroux – Batherson – StützleOTT | OTT | 58.5% | 262 | 64.2 | 45.6 |
| 35 | Meier – Bratt – HischierNJD | NJD | 57.9% | 153 | 79.1 | 57.6 |
| 36 | Kopitar – Kempe – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 57.9% | 112 | 75.0 | 54.6 |
| 37 | McDavid – Podkolzin – SavoieEDM | EDM | 57.8% | 113 | 66.8 | 48.8 |
| 38 | Crouse – Carcone – McBainUTA | UTA | 57.7% | 188 | 74.1 | 54.3 |
| 39 | Kreider – Terry – CarlssonANA | ANA | 57.1% | 386 | 71.5 | 53.6 |
| 40 | Backlund – Coleman – HonzekCGY | CGY | 57.1% | 148 | 63.0 | 47.3 |
| 41 | Appleton – Rasmussen – SoderblomDET | DET | 57.1% | 116 | 62.2 | 46.7 |
| 42 | Karlsson – Bains – SassonVAN | VAN | 57.1% | 103 | 62.9 | 47.2 |
| 43 | Schmaltz – Keller – PeterkaUTA | UTA | 57.0% | 200 | 67.1 | 50.7 |
| 44 | Wilson – Protas – SourdifWSH | WSH | 56.9% | 245 | 67.9 | 51.5 |
| 45 | McTavish – Gauthier – SenneckeANA | ANA | 56.9% | 326 | 80.8 | 61.3 |
| 46 | Moore – Byfield – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 56.5% | 285 | 70.8 | 54.6 |
| 47 | Danault – Foegele – MooreLAK | LAK | 56.4% | 157 | 67.2 | 52.0 |
| 48 | Fiala – Byfield – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 56.4% | 125 | 66.0 | 51.1 |
| 49 | McCarron – Smith – WiesblattNSH | NSH | 56.3% | 100 | 58.8 | 45.6 |
| 50 | Lehkonen – MacKinnon – NecasCOL | COL | 56.2% | 558 | 77.1 | 60.0 |
| 51 | Brown – Bratt – HughesNJD | NJD | 56.2% | 246 | 65.2 | 50.8 |
| 52 | Marchenko – Voronkov – FantilliCBJ | CBJ | 56.1% | 220 | 66.4 | 51.9 |
| 53 | Kopitar – Kempe – PanarinLAK | LAK | 56.1% | 310 | 67.8 | 53.1 |
| 54 | Viel – Poehling – GauthierANA | ANA | 55.9% | 135 | 75.4 | 59.4 |
| 55 | Suzuki – Texier – CaufieldMTL | MTL | 55.8% | 157 | 67.6 | 53.5 |
| 56 | Dickinson – Bertuzzi – MikheyevCHI | CHI | 55.7% | 108 | 56.8 | 45.1 |
| 57 | Dowd – Kolesar – SmithVGK | VGK | 55.7% | 117 | 55.3 | 44.0 |
| 58 | Smith – Marner – DorofeyevVGK | VGK | 55.6% | 160 | 58.0 | 46.4 |
| 59 | Buchnevich – Kyrou – NeighboursSTL | STL | 55.5% | 193 | 56.9 | 45.7 |
| 60 | Suzuki – Caufield – SlafkovskýMTL | MTL | 55.5% | 532 | 67.1 | 53.9 |
| 61 | Ehlers – Aho – JarvisCAR | CAR | 55.4% | 141 | 69.5 | 55.8 |
| 62 | Guentzel – Point – GoncalvesTBL | TBL | 55.4% | 115 | 59.2 | 47.7 |
| 63 | Trocheck – Panarin – LafrenièreNYR | NYR | 55.3% | 184 | 61.2 | 49.5 |
| 64 | Wilson – McMichael – ProtasWSH | WSH | 55.2% | 100 | 66.7 | 54.1 |
| 65 | Palat – Bratt – HughesNJD | NJD | 55.2% | 117 | 70.7 | 57.4 |
| 66 | Palmieri – Horvat – HeinemanNYI | NYI | 55.2% | 109 | 64.4 | 52.3 |
| 67 | Stone – Barbashev – EichelVGK | VGK | 55.1% | 363 | 65.7 | 53.5 |
| 68 | Rantanen – Robertson – JohnstonDAL | DAL | 55.0% | 131 | 67.7 | 55.3 |
| 69 | Nelson – Nichushkin – ColtonCOL | COL | 54.8% | 175 | 74.1 | 61.0 |
| 70 | Dickinson – Donato – MikheyevCHI | CHI | 54.5% | 187 | 57.8 | 48.2 |
| 71 | Norris – Doan – OstlundBUF | BUF | 54.5% | 128 | 59.5 | 49.6 |
| 72 | Kucherov – Point – GoncalvesTBL | TBL | 54.5% | 128 | 59.5 | 49.6 |
| 73 | Olofsson – Kelly – DruryCOL | COL | 54.5% | 99 | 69.4 | 58.0 |
| 74 | Gourde – Girgensons – HolmbergTBL | TBL | 54.5% | 619 | 56.4 | 47.1 |
| 75 | Meier – Hischier – MercerNJD | NJD | 54.5% | 476 | 67.3 | 56.2 |
| 76 | Verhaeghe – Reinhart – RodriguesFLA | FLA | 54.5% | 194 | 66.0 | 55.2 |
| 77 | Landeskog – MacKinnon – NecasCOL | COL | 54.4% | 213 | 73.9 | 62.0 |
| 78 | Smith – Celebrini – ChernyshovSJS | SJS | 54.3% | 128 | 59.0 | 49.6 |
| 79 | Zibanejad – Panarin – LafrenièreNYR | NYR | 54.3% | 227 | 65.5 | 55.2 |
| 80 | Jenner – Monahan – JohnsonCBJ | CBJ | 54.2% | 135 | 72.7 | 61.5 |
| 81 | Thomas – Holloway – SnuggerudSTL | STL | 54.1% | 253 | 63.7 | 54.0 |
| 82 | Kucherov – Guentzel – PointTBL | TBL | 54.0% | 217 | 66.1 | 56.4 |
| 83 | Stamkos – O'Reilly – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 53.9% | 266 | 59.1 | 50.5 |
| 84 | Perron – Batherson – CozensOTT | OTT | 53.9% | 139 | 62.5 | 53.4 |
| 85 | Zuccarello – Hartman – KaprizovMIN | MIN | 53.9% | 419 | 66.8 | 57.2 |
| 86 | Killorn – Granlund – SenneckeANA | ANA | 53.8% | 258 | 62.0 | 53.2 |
| 87 | Lowry – Vilardi – PerfettiWPG | WPG | 53.8% | 235 | 58.0 | 49.8 |
| 88 | Tuch – Thompson – BensonBUF | BUF | 53.7% | 119 | 61.9 | 53.3 |
| 89 | Giroux – Amadio – GreigOTT | OTT | 53.6% | 115 | 54.7 | 47.4 |
| 90 | Couturier – Tippett – BarkeyPHI | PHI | 53.5% | 165 | 60.2 | 52.3 |
| 91 | Couturier – Brink – MichkovPHI | PHI | 53.5% | 104 | 57.2 | 49.7 |
| 92 | Verhaeghe – Bennett – TkachukFLA | FLA | 53.5% | 179 | 61.2 | 53.2 |
| 93 | Wilson – Dubois – ProtasWSH | WSH | 53.5% | 132 | 59.2 | 51.5 |
| 94 | Armia – Fiala – ByfieldLAK | LAK | 53.5% | 123 | 63.7 | 55.4 |
| 95 | Backlund – Coleman – ZaryCGY | CGY | 53.4% | 207 | 59.2 | 51.6 |
| 96 | Acciari – Dewar – LizottePIT | PIT | 53.4% | 363 | 62.3 | 54.3 |
| 97 | Marchment – Marchenko – FantilliCBJ | CBJ | 53.3% | 354 | 65.0 | 56.9 |
| 98 | Zibanejad – Panarin – CuylleNYR | NYR | 53.3% | 126 | 64.6 | 56.6 |
| 99 | Giroux – Amadio – PintoOTT | OTT | 53.3% | 285 | 54.1 | 47.3 |
| 100 | Barbashev – Eichel – MarnerVGK | VGK | 53.3% | 101 | 68.0 | 59.6 |
Minimum sample: 98 min (it scales with games played). 3,064 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Shot-attempt share while exactly these three forwards were on the ice together at 5-on-5.
How reliable is it?
Lines rarely reach the ice time needed for goal-based stats to settle, which is why the line boards lead with shot share.
How lines are detected →Related leaderboards
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.
- D-pair CF%Shot-attempt share with exactly these two defencemen on the ice at 5-on-5.
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.