Lines, pairs and power-play units
Forward Line CF% Leaders (5v5)
2023-245-on-5Through 82 team games
Linemates matter more than almost anything else in a forward's numbers, so it helps to rate the unit itself. Every forward trio here is an exact set of three players on the ice together at 5-on-5, detected second by second from the NHL shift charts, not a "usual line" guessed from a depth chart.
Only lines with meaningful time together qualify; the minimum grows with the number of games played.
Leader in 2023-24: Hintz – Robertson – Johnston (DAL), 68.4% CF%.
Line CF% leaderboard
| # | Line | Team | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hintz – Robertson – JohnstonDAL | DAL | 68.4% | 110 | 90.7 | 41.8 |
| 2 | Noesen – Necas – DruryCAR | CAR | 67.6% | 138 | 79.9 | 38.2 |
| 3 | Staal – Fast – MartinookCAR | CAR | 65.2% | 389 | 80.1 | 42.7 |
| 4 | Jankowski – Novak – EvangelistaNSH | NSH | 62.9% | 180 | 81.8 | 48.2 |
| 5 | Toffoli – Bratt – HughesNJD | NJD | 62.4% | 143 | 80.0 | 48.1 |
| 6 | Bertuzzi – Domi – MatthewsTOR | TOR | 62.1% | 147 | 84.9 | 51.8 |
| 7 | Palat – Bratt – HischierNJD | NJD | 61.9% | 267 | 83.0 | 51.1 |
| 8 | Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavidEDM | EDM | 61.8% | 465 | 80.0 | 49.6 |
| 9 | Bunting – Necas – DruryCAR | CAR | 61.6% | 160 | 80.9 | 50.4 |
| 10 | Rodrigues – Luostarinen – LundellFLA | FLA | 61.5% | 220 | 75.7 | 47.4 |
| 11 | Couturier – Konecny – TippettPHI | PHI | 61.5% | 108 | 78.9 | 49.5 |
| 12 | Guentzel – Aho – JarvisCAR | CAR | 61.4% | 181 | 75.9 | 47.7 |
| 13 | Verhaeghe – Barkov – ReinhartFLA | FLA | 61.1% | 205 | 74.3 | 47.4 |
| 14 | Staal – Martinook – JarvisCAR | CAR | 60.8% | 299 | 72.7 | 46.8 |
| 15 | Miller – Boeser – SuterVAN | VAN | 60.4% | 193 | 71.4 | 46.9 |
| 16 | Atkinson – Couturier – TippettPHI | PHI | 60.2% | 114 | 79.4 | 52.6 |
| 17 | Cousins – Luostarinen – LundellFLA | FLA | 60.0% | 165 | 77.3 | 51.6 |
| 18 | Teravainen – Aho – JarvisCAR | CAR | 59.9% | 105 | 64.3 | 43.0 |
| 19 | Panarin – Chytil – LafrenièreNYR | NYR | 59.8% | 107 | 68.7 | 46.2 |
| 20 | Kerfoot – Schmaltz – KellerARI | ARI | 59.5% | 203 | 66.5 | 45.2 |
| 21 | Couturier – Konecny – FoersterPHI | PHI | 59.5% | 230 | 77.0 | 52.4 |
| 22 | Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavidEDM | EDM | 59.4% | 291 | 77.6 | 53.1 |
| 23 | Giroux – Tkachuk – StützleOTT | OTT | 59.3% | 159 | 80.9 | 55.5 |
| 24 | Wennberg – Kakko – CuylleNYR | NYR | 59.2% | 115 | 65.8 | 45.4 |
| 25 | Teravainen – Aho – SvechnikovCAR | CAR | 59.0% | 227 | 71.8 | 49.9 |
| 26 | Reinhart – Luostarinen – LundellFLA | FLA | 59.0% | 130 | 69.7 | 48.4 |
| 27 | Kreider – Zibanejad – RoslovicNYR | NYR | 58.8% | 177 | 75.1 | 52.7 |
| 28 | Scheifele – Ehlers – ConnorWPG | WPG | 58.7% | 143 | 73.3 | 51.6 |
| 29 | Verhaeghe – Bennett – TkachukFLA | FLA | 58.7% | 465 | 78.3 | 55.1 |
| 30 | Kadri – Pospisil – KuzmenkoCGY | CGY | 58.7% | 135 | 75.3 | 53.0 |
| 31 | Hathaway – Poehling – CatesPHI | PHI | 58.6% | 160 | 77.9 | 55.1 |
| 32 | Cates – Farabee – BrinkPHI | PHI | 58.6% | 102 | 58.0 | 41.0 |
| 33 | Lehkonen – MacKinnon – RantanenCOL | COL | 58.4% | 160 | 69.4 | 49.5 |
| 34 | Carrier – Kolesar – RoyVGK | VGK | 58.3% | 165 | 66.6 | 47.6 |
| 35 | Trocheck – Panarin – LafrenièreNYR | NYR | 58.2% | 861 | 75.0 | 53.8 |
| 36 | Namestnikov – Iafallo – PerfettiWPG | WPG | 58.0% | 153 | 69.8 | 50.6 |
| 37 | Cousins – Bennett – TkachukFLA | FLA | 58.0% | 204 | 77.2 | 56.0 |
| 38 | Huberdeau – Sharangovich – KuzmenkoCGY | CGY | 57.9% | 101 | 67.5 | 48.9 |
| 39 | Barkov – Reinhart – RodriguesFLA | FLA | 57.7% | 385 | 74.4 | 54.4 |
| 40 | Kucherov – Point – HagelTBL | TBL | 57.7% | 345 | 69.8 | 51.2 |
| 41 | Crosby – Rakell – GuentzelPIT | PIT | 57.2% | 193 | 78.5 | 58.6 |
| 42 | MacKinnon – Nichushkin – RantanenCOL | COL | 57.1% | 379 | 75.4 | 56.6 |
| 43 | Malkin – Rakell – BuntingPIT | PIT | 57.1% | 193 | 73.4 | 55.1 |
| 44 | Danault – Fiala – MooreLAK | LAK | 57.1% | 590 | 70.0 | 52.6 |
| 45 | Dubois – Kaliyev – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 57.0% | 130 | 70.9 | 53.4 |
| 46 | Smith – Faksa – SteelDAL | DAL | 57.0% | 377 | 62.2 | 46.9 |
| 47 | Haula – Toffoli – HughesNJD | NJD | 56.9% | 133 | 73.9 | 55.9 |
| 48 | Danault – Moore – KaliyevLAK | LAK | 56.9% | 120 | 72.4 | 54.9 |
| 49 | Crosby – Rust – GuentzelPIT | PIT | 56.8% | 362 | 80.4 | 61.2 |
| 50 | Toffoli – Monahan – EhlersWPG | WPG | 56.8% | 107 | 72.8 | 55.4 |
| 51 | Lewis – Grundstrom – LizotteLAK | LAK | 56.7% | 193 | 73.3 | 55.9 |
| 52 | Cozens – Peterka – BensonBUF | BUF | 56.3% | 195 | 72.1 | 56.0 |
| 53 | Bunting – Necas – KotkaniemiCAR | CAR | 56.2% | 116 | 73.2 | 57.1 |
| 54 | Wood – Colton – O'ConnorCOL | COL | 56.1% | 282 | 78.7 | 61.5 |
| 55 | Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – BoldyMIN | MIN | 56.1% | 370 | 71.4 | 55.8 |
| 56 | Eller – O'Connor – ZohornaPIT | PIT | 56.0% | 123 | 68.5 | 53.8 |
| 57 | Benn – Stankoven – JohnstonDAL | DAL | 56.0% | 227 | 75.7 | 59.6 |
| 58 | Schwartz – Burakovsky – WennbergSEA | SEA | 55.9% | 123 | 67.0 | 52.8 |
| 59 | MacKinnon – Drouin – RantanenCOL | COL | 55.9% | 479 | 75.6 | 59.7 |
| 60 | Skinner – Tuch – MittelstadtBUF | BUF | 55.7% | 141 | 70.4 | 55.9 |
| 61 | Malkin – Smith – RakellPIT | PIT | 55.6% | 190 | 68.7 | 54.7 |
| 62 | Katchouk – Kastelic – KellyOTT | OTT | 55.5% | 105 | 66.6 | 53.5 |
| 63 | Skinner – Tuch – ThompsonBUF | BUF | 55.4% | 235 | 70.1 | 56.3 |
| 64 | Marner – Matthews – KniesTOR | TOR | 55.4% | 400 | 67.3 | 54.1 |
| 65 | Scheifele – Ehlers – VilardiWPG | WPG | 55.2% | 207 | 72.7 | 59.1 |
| 66 | Toffoli – Meier – HughesNJD | NJD | 55.2% | 105 | 70.4 | 57.3 |
| 67 | Grundstrom – Dubois – LaferriereLAK | LAK | 55.1% | 107 | 69.2 | 56.4 |
| 68 | Giroux – Norris – TkachukOTT | OTT | 55.0% | 158 | 69.0 | 56.5 |
| 69 | Gourde – Bjorkstrand – TolvanenSEA | SEA | 54.9% | 517 | 71.5 | 58.7 |
| 70 | Jarnkrok – Domi – RobertsonTOR | TOR | 54.9% | 182 | 63.1 | 51.9 |
| 71 | Eberle – Kartye – BeniersSEA | SEA | 54.9% | 110 | 67.7 | 55.7 |
| 72 | Ovechkin – Wilson – StromeWSH | WSH | 54.8% | 297 | 71.2 | 58.7 |
| 73 | Pettersson – Mikheyev – KuzmenkoVAN | VAN | 54.8% | 181 | 65.8 | 54.2 |
| 74 | Eller – Smith – PuustinenPIT | PIT | 54.8% | 164 | 71.2 | 58.7 |
| 75 | Killorn – Terry – CarlssonANA | ANA | 54.7% | 348 | 65.1 | 53.9 |
| 76 | Cizikas – Engvall – HolmstromNYI | NYI | 54.7% | 102 | 58.3 | 48.3 |
| 77 | Blueger – Joshua – GarlandVAN | VAN | 54.6% | 360 | 57.1 | 47.4 |
| 78 | Draisaitl – Foegele – McLeodEDM | EDM | 54.6% | 144 | 69.1 | 57.5 |
| 79 | Giroux – Joseph – StützleOTT | OTT | 54.6% | 307 | 66.1 | 54.9 |
| 80 | Backlund – Coleman – MangiapaneCGY | CGY | 54.5% | 484 | 71.2 | 59.4 |
| 81 | Kopitar – Kempe – ByfieldLAK | LAK | 54.5% | 634 | 64.6 | 53.9 |
| 82 | Pavelski – Hintz – RobertsonDAL | DAL | 54.5% | 716 | 66.4 | 55.5 |
| 83 | Marchand – Pastrnak – ZachaBOS | BOS | 54.4% | 191 | 65.6 | 54.9 |
| 84 | Tavares – Bertuzzi – MarnerTOR | TOR | 54.3% | 123 | 64.4 | 54.2 |
| 85 | Batherson – Tkachuk – PintoOTT | OTT | 54.3% | 272 | 68.6 | 57.8 |
| 86 | Paul – Cirelli – HagelTBL | TBL | 54.2% | 136 | 62.9 | 53.1 |
| 87 | Buchnevich – Kyrou – ThomasSTL | STL | 54.2% | 492 | 65.9 | 55.8 |
| 88 | Backlund – Coleman – HuberdeauCGY | CGY | 54.1% | 272 | 66.7 | 56.5 |
| 89 | Larkin – DeBrincat – RaymondDET | DET | 54.1% | 308 | 71.7 | 60.8 |
| 90 | Gallagher – Pearson – MonahanMTL | MTL | 54.0% | 126 | 70.1 | 59.6 |
| 91 | Tavares – Bertuzzi – NylanderTOR | TOR | 54.0% | 365 | 71.9 | 61.2 |
| 92 | Nelson – Horvat – BarzalNYI | NYI | 54.0% | 120 | 64.5 | 55.0 |
| 93 | Eberle – McCann – BeniersSEA | SEA | 53.9% | 266 | 65.0 | 55.5 |
| 94 | Kadri – Pospisil – ZaryCGY | CGY | 53.9% | 381 | 68.6 | 58.7 |
| 95 | Kuraly – Danforth – TexierCBJ | CBJ | 53.9% | 144 | 66.9 | 57.3 |
| 96 | Nyquist – O'Reilly – ForsbergNSH | NSH | 53.9% | 763 | 71.8 | 61.5 |
| 97 | Lee – Horvat – BarzalNYI | NYI | 53.9% | 479 | 76.9 | 65.8 |
| 98 | Schmaltz – Keller – HaytonARI | ARI | 53.8% | 240 | 60.4 | 52.0 |
| 99 | Blackwell – Dickinson – AndersonCHI | CHI | 53.6% | 264 | 57.1 | 49.4 |
| 100 | McCarron – Sherwood – SmithNSH | NSH | 53.6% | 257 | 62.5 | 54.0 |
Minimum sample: 98 min (it scales with games played). 2,976 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Shot-attempt share while exactly these three forwards were on the ice together at 5-on-5.
How reliable is it?
Lines rarely reach the ice time needed for goal-based stats to settle, which is why the line boards lead with shot share.
How lines are detected →Related leaderboards
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.
- D-pair CF%Shot-attempt share with exactly these two defencemen on the ice at 5-on-5.
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.