On-ice results

5v5 Corsi For % (CF%) Leaders

2026-275-on-5Through 3 team games

Corsi For percentage is the share of all shot attempts (goals, saves, misses and blocks) that went toward the opponent's net while a skater was on the ice. It is the oldest possession proxy in hockey analytics and still the fastest to stabilise, because attempts happen about ten times as often as goals.

Attempts are counted from the NHL play-by-play and credited to every skater on the ice using the shift charts, at 5-on-5 by default.

Leader in 2026-27: Leon Draisaitl (EDM), 80.4% CF%.

Season2026-27 2025-26 2024-25 2023-24

Strength5-on-5 Even strength All situations

Early sample: teams have played at most 3 games in 2026-27. Expect big swings.

97 qualified

Show

5v5 Corsi For % (CF%) Leaders, 2026-27, 5-on-5
#	Player	Team					GP
1	Leon DraisaitlFEDM	EDM	80.4%	29	83.8	20.4	2	100%
2	Vasily PodkolzinFEDM	EDM	78.7%	27	80.9	21.9	2	64%▲55
3	Evan BouchardDEDM	EDM	72.3%	37	75.4	28.9	2	100%
4	Connor McDavidFEDM	EDM	69.1%	30	76.8	34.4	2	100%▲1.5
5	Mattias EkholmDEDM	EDM	68.8%	36	72.5	32.9	2	77%▲9.7
6	Kasperi KapanenFEDM	EDM	66.7%	28	77.4	38.7	2	7.5%▲7.2
7	Jack RoslovicFTOR	TOR	63.9%	26	52.2	29.5	2	34%▲26
8	Luke SchennDVAN	VAN	62.8%	25	65.6	38.9	2	7.3%▲6.9
9	Auston MatthewsFTOR	TOR	61.4%	28	58.0	36.5	2	99%
10	Seth JonesDFLA	FLA	61.2%	35	52.1	33.0	2	80%▲32
11	Sam ReinhartFFLA	FLA	59.5%	25	52.5	35.8	2	99%
12	Jordan GreenwayFCHI	CHI	59.0%	25	54.5	37.9	2	0.3%
13	Kirill MarchenkoFTOR	TOR	58.3%	27	61.8	44.1	2	98%▲7
14	Ryan SheaDEDM	EDM	57.7%	36	49.8	36.5	2	15%▲9.6
15	Carter VerhaegheFFLA	FLA	57.1%	26	45.9	34.4	2	73%▲1
16	Elias PetterssonDVAN	VAN	56.1%	26	52.5	41.1	2	13%▲13
17	Niko MikkolaDFLA	FLA	55.4%	36	52.1	42.0	2	4.9%▲4.4
18	Oliver BjorkstrandFNYR	NYR	55.1%	37	61.8	50.4	3	20%
19	Frank NazarFCHI	CHI	54.9%	28	59.9	49.2	2	54%▲34
20	Alex FormentonFEDM	EDM	54.5%	27	53.8	44.8	2	9.6%▲9.6
21	Dmitry KulikovDFLA	FLA	54.3%	25	44.8	37.7	2	3.2%▲3.1
22	Marco RossiFVAN	VAN	54.0%	24	68.7	58.5	2	58%▲12
23	Sean DurziDNYR	NYR	53.7%	48	54.6	47.2	3	37%▲35
24	Sam RinzelDCHI	CHI	53.1%	34	60.6	53.5	2	33%▲32
25	Cole SmithFCHI	CHI	52.5%	26	48.5	43.9	2	0.1%
26	J.T. MillerFNYR	NYR	52.2%	36	59.6	54.6	3	92%▲7.9
27	Vladislav GavrikovDNYR	NYR	51.6%	53	53.3	49.9	3	41%▼5.7
28	Sam BennettFFLA	FLA	51.4%	27	39.3	37.1	2	83%▲4
29	Sandis VilmanisFFLA	FLA	51.1%	24	61.0	58.5	2	6.4%▲6.3
30	Darren RaddyshDTOR	TOR	50.7%	32	63.8	61.9	2	100%▲3.5
31	Jake WalmanDEDM	EDM	50.0%	24	62.2	62.2	2	33%▲30
32	Jonathan LekkerimäkiFVAN	VAN	50.0%	23	52.4	52.4	2	25%▲25
33	Pavel DorofeyevFNYR	NYR	49.3%	37	55.4	57.0	3	92%▲1.7
34	Morgan RiellyDTOR	TOR	49.2%	32	54.3	56.2	2	76%▼4.7
35	Shakir MukhamadullinDEDM	EDM	48.8%	23	52.0	54.6	2	14%▲14
36	Roman KantserovFCHI	CHI	48.7%	27	42.3	44.6	2	59%▲49
37	Alexis LafrenièreFNYR	NYR	48.4%	43	41.4	44.2	3	82%▲13
38	Liam OhgrenFVAN	VAN	47.8%	28	47.8	52.1	2	17%▲17
39	Adam FoxDNYR	NYR	47.6%	46	51.9	57.1	3	99%▲6.5
40	Max JonesFEDM	EDM	47.6%	23	51.7	56.9	2	0.1%
41	Ian ColeDCHI	CHI	47.5%	24	47.8	52.8	2	4.9%▲4.3
42	Marcus PetterssonDNYR	NYR	47.1%	53	45.2	50.8	3	5.8%▲5.4
43	Ryan GreeneFCHI	CHI	46.9%	28	50.1	56.6	2	10%▲10
44	Brock BoeserFVAN	VAN	46.8%	28	47.8	54.3	2	63%▼5.5
45	Gabe PerreaultFNYR	NYR	46.7%	38	43.7	50.0	3	53%▲47
46	Denton MateychukDCBJ	CBJ	46.7%	23	35.9	41.0	1	42%▲40
47	Aaron EkbladDFLA	FLA	46.7%	23	36.0	41.1	2	50%▲34
48	Jake McCabeDTOR	TOR	46.5%	24	49.3	56.8	2	34%▼15
49	Zeev BuiumDVAN	VAN	46.5%	39	50.9	58.6	2	74%▲54
50	Joseph VelenoFNYR	NYR	46.4%	34	46.5	53.6	3	3.3%▲3.1
51	Wyatt KaiserDCHI	CHI	45.3%	37	55.0	66.4	2	6.5%▲6.2
52	Will CuylleFNYR	NYR	45.2%	35	48.0	58.3	3	64%
53	Filip HronekDVAN	VAN	45.0%	33	49.1	60.0	2	91%▲14
54	Nick SeelerDPHI	PHI	45.0%	29	37.0	45.3	2	8.9%▲8.4
55	Colton DachFEDM	EDM	45.0%	24	44.4	54.3	2	11%▲11
56	Mika ZibanejadFNYR	NYR	44.4%	43	38.9	48.6	3	98%▲1.1
57	Oliver Ekman-LarssonDTOR	TOR	44.2%	27	50.2	63.3	2	43%▲32
58	Artyom LevshunovDCHI	CHI	43.7%	36	51.6	66.5	2	45%▲43
59	Eeli TolvanenFNYR	NYR	42.6%	31	50.0	67.3	3	36%▼9.4
60	Tyler BertuzziFCHI	CHI	42.1%	29	50.5	69.5	2	62%▼3.2
61	Matvei MichkovFPHI	PHI	41.3%	24	47.8	67.9	2	86%▲23
62	Noah LabaFNYR	NYR	41.2%	35	47.5	67.8	3	11%▲11
63	Patrick KaneFCHI	CHI	41.2%	34	49.9	71.3	2	80%▲0.9
64	Simon BenoitDPHI	PHI	40.9%	31	34.6	49.9	2	4.9%▲4.4
65	Troy StecherDTOR	TOR	40.5%	28	36.3	53.3	2	0.2%
66	Max SassonFVAN	VAN	40.4%	25	45.5	67.0	2	4.9%▲4.9
67	Drew O'ConnorFVAN	VAN	40.4%	26	47.7	70.4	2	5.9%▲4.5
68	Rasmus RistolainenDPHI	PHI	38.8%	34	54.4	86.0	2	7.5%▲6.8
69	Connor MurphyDEDM	EDM	38.5%	38	39.1	62.6	2	5.9%▲5
70	Bowen ByramDCHI	CHI	37.5%	41	43.9	73.2	2	97%▲6.9
71	Mathieu JosephFEDM	EDM	37.5%	26	34.2	56.9	2	0.1%
72	Christian DvorakFPHI	PHI	37.3%	29	45.9	77.2	2	16%▲13
73	Paul CotterFVAN	VAN	37.1%	24	32.8	55.5	2	14%▲14
74	Alberts SmitsDNYR	NYR	37.0%	42	38.1	65.0	3	35%▲34
75	Sean CouturierFPHI	PHI	36.7%	25	43.6	75.2	2	9.2%▲7.2
76	Chris TanevDTOR	TOR	36.4%	30	40.2	70.4	2	6.0%▲5
77	Elias PetterssonFVAN	VAN	35.7%	26	35.2	63.4	2	87%▼5.8
78	Braden SchneiderDNYR	NYR	35.1%	44	37.1	68.6	3	19%▲17
79	Linus KarlssonFVAN	VAN	35.0%	25	34.3	63.7	2	11%▲9.5
80	Travis SanheimDPHI	PHI	34.9%	34	50.8	94.6	2	67%▼7
81	Noel AcciariFPHI	PHI	34.8%	25	37.9	71.1	2	3.3%▲3.1
82	William NylanderFTOR	TOR	34.5%	23	51.4	97.6	2	99%▼0.9
83	Travis KonecnyFPHI	PHI	33.3%	25	41.5	83.0	2	92%▲9.9
84	Anton FrondellFCHI	CHI	32.8%	27	48.2	98.5	2	72%▲51
85	Owen TippettFPHI	PHI	32.7%	25	43.4	89.2	2	78%▼6.7
86	Tye KartyeFNYR	NYR	32.1%	33	30.9	65.4	3	7.2%▲7.1
87	Oliver MooreFCHI	CHI	31.3%	23	39.4	86.6	2	22%▲22
88	Tyson FoersterFPHI	PHI	30.4%	27	37.9	86.9	2	42%▲38
89	Jamie OleksiakDVAN	VAN	29.7%	37	31.0	73.5	2	5.1%▲4.8
90	Trevor ZegrasFPHI	PHI	29.4%	28	32.7	78.4	2	86%▲19
91	Jake DeBruskFVAN	VAN	29.4%	25	24.0	57.6	2	49%▼20
92	Porter MartoneFPHI	PHI	28.8%	23	39.8	98.2	2	91%▲36
93	Tom WillanderDVAN	VAN	28.8%	36	28.0	69.2	2	25%▲24
94	Gavin McKennaFTOR	TOR	28.3%	25	36.6	92.6	2	94%▲11
95	Cam YorkDPHI	PHI	26.6%	31	33.0	91.2	2	21%▲19
96	Jamie DrysdaleDPHI	PHI	24.3%	33	30.9	96.3	2	55%▲46
97	Alex VlasicDCHI	CHI	23.6%	33	24.0	77.4	2	9.0%▲7.7

Minimum sample: 23 min (it scales with games played). 376 below the minimum are hidden.

How to read it

50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.

How reliable is it?

CF% stabilises faster than any goal-based stat, but it ignores shot quality: pair it with xGF% before drawing conclusions.

CF% in the stat glossary →

All NHL leaderboards →

5v5 CF% leaderboard

How to read it

How reliable is it?

Related leaderboards