On-ice results
Sequence xG (sxGF%) Leaders
2023-24All situationsThrough 82 team games
Plain expected goals add up every shot in a scramble as if each one were a fresh chance, even though only one goal can come out of it. Sequence xG discounts each follow-up attempt by the chance the play was already over: a shot worth 0.30 after a 0.25 rebound counts as 0.30 × 0.75.
That takes about 5.5% out of the league total, but it moves individual players much more: skaters whose lines live on second and third whacks drop, and clean one-shot rush lines rise.
Leader in 2023-24: Zach Hyman (EDM), 69.1% sxGF%.
Sequence xG leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 69.1% | 1,560 | 5.23 | 2.33 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 2 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 68.3% | 1,623 | 5.24 | 2.43 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 3 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 67.0% | 1,863 | 4.79 | 2.36 | 100% |
| 4 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 66.4% | 1,492 | 4.90 | 2.48 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 5 | Matt BoldyFMIN | MIN | 66.1% | 1,418 | 4.26 | 2.19 | 100% |
| 6 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 65.8% | 1,871 | 4.68 | 2.43 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 7 | Evan RodriguesFFLA | FLA | 65.5% | 1,213 | 3.48 | 1.83 | 8.3%▲6.5 |
| 8 | Jason RobertsonFDAL | DAL | 65.5% | 1,503 | 3.95 | 2.08 | 100%▲0.5 |
| 9 | Kirill KaprizovFMIN | MIN | 65.2% | 1,618 | 4.30 | 2.29 | 98%▼0.8 |
| 10 | Stefan NoesenFCAR | CAR | 65.2% | 961 | 3.44 | 1.84 | 0.1% |
| 11 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 65.1% | 1,365 | 4.53 | 2.43 | 73%▲1 |
| 12 | James van RiemsdykFBOS | BOS | 65.1% | 959 | 3.78 | 2.03 | 0.3% |
| 13 | Shane PintoFOTT | OTT | 64.4% | 742 | 3.76 | 2.08 | 37%▲22 |
| 14 | Mats ZuccarelloFMIN | MIN | 64.3% | 1,304 | 4.07 | 2.26 | 50%▲28 |
| 15 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 64.1% | 1,433 | 4.49 | 2.51 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 16 | Artemi PanarinFNYR | NYR | 64.0% | 1,650 | 4.67 | 2.62 | 98%▼1.2 |
| 17 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 63.9% | 1,551 | 4.09 | 2.32 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 18 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 63.5% | 1,665 | 4.24 | 2.44 | 99% |
| 19 | Brock BoeserFVAN | VAN | 63.5% | 1,507 | 4.06 | 2.34 | 63%▼5.5 |
| 20 | Mikko RantanenFCOL | COL | 63.4% | 1,832 | 4.36 | 2.51 | 99%▲0.7 |
| 21 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 63.4% | 1,676 | 4.72 | 2.72 | 100% |
| 22 | Andrei KuzmenkoFVAN/CGY | VAN/CGY | 63.3% | 1,072 | 3.94 | 2.28 | 11%▲9.8 |
| 23 | John TavaresFTOR | TOR | 63.3% | 1,429 | 4.30 | 2.50 | 96%▲9.3 |
| 24 | Jake GuentzelFPIT/CAR | PIT/CAR | 63.2% | 1,341 | 5.03 | 2.92 | 100% |
| 25 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 63.2% | 1,698 | 4.48 | 2.60 | 99% |
| 26 | Jonathan DrouinFCOL | COL | 63.1% | 1,437 | 4.12 | 2.40 | 0.5% |
| 27 | Roope HintzFDAL | DAL | 63.0% | 1,379 | 4.14 | 2.44 | 85%▲7.6 |
| 28 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 62.8% | 1,742 | 3.80 | 2.25 | 100%▲4.5 |
| 29 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 62.8% | 1,755 | 4.76 | 2.82 | 100% |
| 30 | Joe PavelskiFDAL | DAL | 62.7% | 1,378 | 3.87 | 2.30 | — |
| 31 | Kevin FialaFLAK | LAK | 62.7% | 1,479 | 3.70 | 2.20 | 67%▼8.4 |
| 32 | David PastrnakFBOS | BOS | 62.6% | 1,634 | 4.19 | 2.51 | 100%▲1.2 |
| 33 | Conor GarlandFVAN | VAN | 62.3% | 1,192 | 3.36 | 2.04 | 10%▲7.4 |
| 34 | Kailer YamamotoFSEA | SEA | 62.3% | 708 | 2.90 | 1.76 | 0.2% |
| 35 | Quinn HughesDVAN | VAN | 62.1% | 2,024 | 3.80 | 2.32 | 100% |
| 36 | Arthur KaliyevFLAK | LAK | 61.7% | 602 | 3.20 | 1.99 | — |
| 37 | Ryan Nugent-HopkinsFEDM | EDM | 61.7% | 1,570 | 4.64 | 2.87 | 77%▲15 |
| 38 | Quinton ByfieldFLAK | LAK | 61.7% | 1,319 | 3.33 | 2.07 | 86%▲18 |
| 39 | Tommy NovakFNSH | NSH | 61.4% | 1,008 | 3.75 | 2.36 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 40 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 61.3% | 1,959 | 3.68 | 2.32 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 41 | Jordan EberleFSEA | SEA | 61.3% | 1,361 | 3.57 | 2.26 | 30%▲2.6 |
| 42 | Luke EvangelistaFNSH | NSH | 61.2% | 1,116 | 3.48 | 2.21 | 70%▲23 |
| 43 | Brandon MontourDFLA | FLA | 61.2% | 1,548 | 3.73 | 2.37 | 83%▲10 |
| 44 | Valeri NichushkinFCOL | COL | 60.9% | 1,153 | 4.01 | 2.57 | 60% |
| 45 | Andrei SvechnikovFCAR | CAR | 60.9% | 1,002 | 4.18 | 2.69 | 97%▲8.5 |
| 46 | Nikolaj EhlersFWPG | WPG | 60.9% | 1,302 | 3.67 | 2.36 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 47 | Gabriel VilardiFWPG | WPG | 60.9% | 799 | 3.79 | 2.44 | 80%▲7.7 |
| 48 | Sam BennettFFLA | FLA | 60.8% | 1,146 | 4.00 | 2.58 | 83%▲4 |
| 49 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 60.6% | 1,531 | 4.15 | 2.70 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 50 | Morgan FrostFPHI | PHI | 60.6% | 1,124 | 3.29 | 2.14 | 23%▲17 |
| 51 | Filip ForsbergFNSH | NSH | 60.5% | 1,550 | 4.27 | 2.79 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 52 | Adam FoxDNYR | NYR | 60.5% | 1,688 | 3.82 | 2.50 | 99%▲6.5 |
| 53 | J.T. MillerFVAN | VAN | 60.3% | 1,579 | 4.10 | 2.69 | 92%▲7.9 |
| 54 | Ben HuttonDVGK | VGK | 60.2% | 667 | 2.89 | 1.91 | — |
| 55 | Vincent TrocheckFNYR | NYR | 60.1% | 1,759 | 4.30 | 2.86 | 88%▼5.5 |
| 56 | Rickard RakellFPIT | PIT | 60.1% | 1,156 | 3.71 | 2.47 | 82%▲9.9 |
| 57 | Brayden PointFTBL | TBL | 60.0% | 1,623 | 4.45 | 2.97 | 95%▲7.7 |
| 58 | Jack DruryFCAR | CAR | 59.9% | 909 | 2.87 | 1.92 | 5.6%▲5.4 |
| 59 | Valtteri PuustinenFPIT | PIT | 59.9% | 611 | 2.99 | 2.00 | — |
| 60 | Sidney CrosbyFPIT | PIT | 59.9% | 1,647 | 4.79 | 3.21 | 100%▲2.4 |
| 61 | Drake BathersonFOTT | OTT | 59.8% | 1,490 | 3.59 | 2.41 | 97%▲7.4 |
| 62 | Mark ScheifeleFWPG | WPG | 59.8% | 1,494 | 3.95 | 2.65 | 100% |
| 63 | William NylanderFTOR | TOR | 59.8% | 1,634 | 4.34 | 2.93 | 99%▼0.9 |
| 64 | Matt DucheneFDAL | DAL | 59.7% | 1,341 | 3.80 | 2.56 | 62%▼17 |
| 65 | Tyler BertuzziFTOR | TOR | 59.7% | 1,284 | 3.62 | 2.44 | 62%▼3.2 |
| 66 | Elias PetterssonFVAN | VAN | 59.7% | 1,611 | 4.06 | 2.75 | 87%▼5.8 |
| 67 | Jordan SpenceDLAK | LAK | 59.6% | 1,024 | 3.06 | 2.08 | 21%▲17 |
| 68 | Roman JosiDNSH | NSH | 59.5% | 2,020 | 3.91 | 2.66 | 98% |
| 69 | Jonathan MarchessaultFVGK | VGK | 59.3% | 1,467 | 3.66 | 2.51 | 24%▼21 |
| 70 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 59.3% | 624 | 2.90 | 1.99 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 71 | Jamie BennFDAL | DAL | 59.2% | 1,240 | 3.89 | 2.68 | 22%▲18 |
| 72 | Teuvo TeravainenFCAR | CAR | 59.2% | 1,247 | 3.53 | 2.43 | 13%▲8.6 |
| 73 | Cole PerfettiFWPG | WPG | 59.1% | 965 | 2.87 | 1.99 | 36%▲32 |
| 74 | Seth JarvisFCAR | CAR | 59.1% | 1,519 | 3.69 | 2.56 | 95%▲1.5 |
| 75 | Declan ChisholmDMIN/WPG | MIN/WPG | 59.0% | 512 | 2.79 | 1.94 | 0.1% |
| 76 | Shea TheodoreDVGK | VGK | 58.9% | 1,038 | 3.42 | 2.38 | 91%▲28 |
| 77 | Kevin ShattenkirkDBOS | BOS | 58.9% | 963 | 3.13 | 2.19 | — |
| 78 | Oliver Ekman-LarssonDFLA | FLA | 58.8% | 1,472 | 3.36 | 2.35 | 43%▲32 |
| 79 | Thomas ChabotDOTT | OTT | 58.8% | 1,175 | 3.40 | 2.38 | 83%▼11 |
| 80 | Nino NiederreiterFWPG | WPG | 58.8% | 1,152 | 2.94 | 2.06 | 4.0%▲3.8 |
| 81 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 58.8% | 1,663 | 3.84 | 2.69 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 82 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 58.6% | 831 | 3.91 | 2.76 | 54%▲37 |
| 83 | Steven StamkosFTBL | TBL | 58.6% | 1,440 | 4.07 | 2.87 | 94%▼3.7 |
| 84 | Mason MarchmentFDAL | DAL | 58.6% | 1,220 | 3.30 | 2.33 | 47%▲34 |
| 85 | Erik KarlssonDPIT | PIT | 58.4% | 1,990 | 3.95 | 2.81 | 95% |
| 86 | Dylan StromeFWSH | WSH | 58.4% | 1,472 | 3.66 | 2.61 | 82%▲10 |
| 87 | Jalen ChatfieldDCAR | CAR | 58.3% | 1,094 | 2.69 | 1.93 | 4.1%▲3.4 |
| 88 | Casey MittelstadtFBUF/COL | BUF/COL | 58.3% | 1,418 | 3.53 | 2.52 | 14%▲12 |
| 89 | Mitch MarnerFTOR | TOR | 58.2% | 1,468 | 4.13 | 2.97 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 90 | Tyler ToffoliFNJD/WPG | NJD/WPG | 58.2% | 1,340 | 4.18 | 3.00 | 38%▼17 |
| 91 | Marco RossiFMIN | MIN | 58.1% | 1,372 | 3.04 | 2.19 | 58%▲12 |
| 92 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 58.1% | 1,300 | 4.11 | 2.96 | 100% |
| 93 | Vince DunnDSEA | SEA | 57.9% | 1,362 | 3.06 | 2.22 | 88%▲11 |
| 94 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 57.9% | 1,087 | 3.75 | 2.72 | 93%▲9 |
| 95 | Nick PaulFTBL | TBL | 57.8% | 1,415 | 3.68 | 2.68 | 8.1%▲7.7 |
| 96 | Pius SuterFVAN | VAN | 57.6% | 1,038 | 2.78 | 2.05 | 4.1%▲3.3 |
| 97 | Evgenii DadonovFDAL | DAL | 57.6% | 672 | 2.89 | 2.13 | 0.1% |
| 98 | Nazem KadriFCGY | CGY | 57.5% | 1,511 | 3.76 | 2.78 | 70%▼9.7 |
| 99 | Thomas HarleyDDAL | DAL | 57.4% | 1,660 | 3.06 | 2.27 | 88%▲8.9 |
| 100 | Michael AmadioFVGK | VGK | 57.4% | 978 | 2.81 | 2.09 | 3.3%▲2.6 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 307 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Read it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
How reliable is it?
Shares the stability of on-ice xGF%. The flurry discount itself is mechanical (no fitted parameters), so it adds no noise.
How Sequence xG is calculated →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 xGF%50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
- Shot DietExpected goals per unblocked attempt. League average is about 0.06-0.07; 0.10+ is an elite diet.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.