On-ice results
Sequence xG (sxGF%) Leaders
2024-255-on-5Through 82 team games
Plain expected goals add up every shot in a scramble as if each one were a fresh chance, even though only one goal can come out of it. Sequence xG discounts each follow-up attempt by the chance the play was already over: a shot worth 0.30 after a 0.25 rebound counts as 0.30 × 0.75.
That takes about 5.5% out of the league total, but it moves individual players much more: skaters whose lines live on second and third whacks drop, and clean one-shot rush lines rise.
Leader in 2024-25: Jackson Blake (CAR), 60.9% sxGF%.
Sequence xG leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson BlakeFCAR | CAR | 60.9% | 914 | 2.92 | 1.88 | 68%▲21 |
| 2 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 60.8% | 1,182 | 3.46 | 2.23 | 100% |
| 3 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 59.9% | 936 | 2.64 | 1.77 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 4 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 59.8% | 1,350 | 3.41 | 2.29 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 5 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 59.7% | 1,153 | 3.57 | 2.41 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 6 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 59.3% | 1,171 | 3.24 | 2.22 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 7 | Anthony CirelliFTBL | TBL | 59.2% | 1,138 | 3.03 | 2.09 | 51%▲19 |
| 8 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 59.1% | 1,080 | 3.38 | 2.34 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 9 | Seth JarvisFCAR | CAR | 58.9% | 957 | 2.95 | 2.06 | 95%▲1.5 |
| 10 | Shayne GostisbehereDCAR | CAR | 58.7% | 994 | 3.01 | 2.12 | 96%▲16 |
| 11 | Brandon HagelFTBL | TBL | 58.5% | 1,232 | 2.97 | 2.11 | 100%▲1.9 |
| 12 | Alex LaferriereFLAK | LAK | 58.2% | 1,086 | 2.68 | 1.92 | 68%▲3.5 |
| 13 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 58.2% | 1,524 | 3.20 | 2.30 | 100% |
| 14 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 58.2% | 952 | 3.01 | 2.17 | 100% |
| 15 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 58.2% | 1,122 | 2.45 | 1.76 | 99% |
| 16 | Mark JankowskiFNSH/CAR | NSH/CAR | 57.9% | 622 | 2.56 | 1.86 | 0.2% |
| 17 | Nate SchmidtDFLA | FLA | 57.9% | 1,139 | 2.47 | 1.80 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 18 | Josh DoanFUTA | UTA | 57.9% | 600 | 2.50 | 1.82 | 61%▲44 |
| 19 | Kevin FialaFLAK | LAK | 57.8% | 1,181 | 2.66 | 1.94 | 67%▼8.4 |
| 20 | Cale MakarDCOL | COL | 57.6% | 1,457 | 3.05 | 2.25 | 100%▲1 |
| 21 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 57.6% | 1,100 | 3.13 | 2.31 | 54%▲37 |
| 22 | Robert ThomasFSTL | STL | 57.5% | 1,032 | 3.07 | 2.26 | 93%▲20 |
| 23 | Warren FoegeleFLAK | LAK | 57.5% | 1,098 | 2.50 | 1.85 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 24 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 57.2% | 1,148 | 2.86 | 2.14 | 73%▲1 |
| 25 | Phillip DanaultFLAK | LAK | 57.2% | 1,095 | 2.59 | 1.94 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 26 | Mackie SamoskevichFFLA | FLA | 57.2% | 808 | 2.59 | 1.94 | — |
| 27 | Nikolaj EhlersFWPG | WPG | 57.0% | 858 | 2.67 | 2.01 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 28 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 57.0% | 1,263 | 3.28 | 2.47 | 100% |
| 29 | Jordan SpenceDLAK | LAK | 56.9% | 1,147 | 2.41 | 1.83 | 21%▲17 |
| 30 | Victor OlofssonFVGK | VGK | 56.8% | 715 | 2.28 | 1.73 | 12%▲12 |
| 31 | Vasily PodkolzinFEDM | EDM | 56.8% | 1,009 | 2.61 | 1.98 | 64%▲55 |
| 32 | Uvis BalinskisDFLA | FLA | 56.8% | 997 | 2.32 | 1.77 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 33 | Sean MonahanFCBJ | CBJ | 56.7% | 743 | 2.98 | 2.28 | 19%▲13 |
| 34 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 56.7% | 985 | 2.80 | 2.14 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 35 | Barrett HaytonFUTA | UTA | 56.7% | 1,028 | 2.94 | 2.25 | 11%▲11 |
| 36 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 56.7% | 953 | 2.84 | 2.17 | 93%▲9 |
| 37 | Jesperi KotkaniemiFCAR | CAR | 56.6% | 968 | 2.73 | 2.09 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 38 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 56.5% | 716 | 2.95 | 2.26 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 39 | Quinton ByfieldFLAK | LAK | 56.4% | 1,141 | 2.50 | 1.94 | 86%▲18 |
| 40 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 56.3% | 1,075 | 3.09 | 2.40 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 41 | Joel KivirantaFCOL | COL | 56.2% | 854 | 2.19 | 1.71 | 0.1% |
| 42 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 56.2% | 954 | 2.98 | 2.33 | 99% |
| 43 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 56.1% | 1,149 | 2.94 | 2.30 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 44 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 56.1% | 1,124 | 2.65 | 2.07 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 45 | Alex TurcotteFLAK | LAK | 56.0% | 737 | 2.34 | 1.84 | 8.8%▲8.8 |
| 46 | Kaedan KorczakDVGK | VGK | 56.0% | 588 | 2.40 | 1.88 | 6.7%▲6.5 |
| 47 | Tomas NosekFFLA | FLA | 56.0% | 509 | 2.39 | 1.87 | — |
| 48 | Eric RobinsonFCAR | CAR | 56.0% | 935 | 2.79 | 2.19 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 49 | Nico HischierFNJD | NJD | 55.9% | 1,073 | 2.73 | 2.16 | 98%▲3 |
| 50 | Jesper BrattFNJD | NJD | 55.8% | 1,079 | 2.88 | 2.28 | 96%▲11 |
| 51 | Brayden McNabbDVGK | VGK | 55.8% | 1,439 | 2.54 | 2.01 | 23%▲20 |
| 52 | Chris TanevDTOR | TOR | 55.7% | 1,229 | 2.33 | 1.85 | 6.0%▲5 |
| 53 | Sean WalkerDCAR | CAR | 55.6% | 1,237 | 2.75 | 2.20 | 60%▼11 |
| 54 | Emil AndraeDPHI | PHI | 55.6% | 642 | 2.48 | 1.98 | 8.8%▲8.6 |
| 55 | William KarlssonFVGK | VGK | 55.6% | 707 | 2.47 | 1.97 | 24%▲20 |
| 56 | Tomas HertlFVGK | VGK | 55.6% | 985 | 2.71 | 2.17 | 83%▲2.9 |
| 57 | Devon ToewsDCOL | COL | 55.6% | 1,506 | 2.78 | 2.22 | 60%▼2.3 |
| 58 | Pierre-Luc DuboisFWSH | WSH | 55.5% | 1,147 | 2.84 | 2.27 | 41%▲32 |
| 59 | Vladislav GavrikovDLAK | LAK | 55.5% | 1,537 | 2.29 | 1.84 | 41%▼5.7 |
| 60 | Mikey AndersonDLAK | LAK | 55.5% | 1,429 | 2.22 | 1.79 | 7.3%▲6.9 |
| 61 | Morgan BarronFWPG | WPG | 55.4% | 668 | 2.09 | 1.68 | 4.8%▲4.7 |
| 62 | Jordan KyrouFSTL | STL | 55.4% | 1,157 | 2.66 | 2.15 | 79%▲2.9 |
| 63 | Mitch MarnerFTOR | TOR | 55.3% | 1,183 | 2.75 | 2.22 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 64 | Ross ColtonFCOL | COL | 55.2% | 748 | 2.47 | 2.01 | 8.1%▲7.8 |
| 65 | Martin NecasFCAR/COL | CAR/COL | 55.2% | 1,113 | 2.93 | 2.37 | 100%▲1.3 |
| 66 | Adam PelechDNYI | NYI | 55.2% | 1,093 | 2.41 | 1.96 | 3.2%▲3 |
| 67 | Dmitry OrlovDCAR | CAR | 55.1% | 1,316 | 2.57 | 2.09 | 35%▲21 |
| 68 | Jordan MartinookFCAR | CAR | 55.1% | 1,007 | 2.61 | 2.13 | 4.3%▲2.7 |
| 69 | Ivan BarbashevFVGK | VGK | 55.1% | 1,070 | 2.88 | 2.34 | 67%▲26 |
| 70 | Pavel BuchnevichFSTL | STL | 55.1% | 1,090 | 2.94 | 2.39 | 36%▲7.7 |
| 71 | Jalen ChatfieldDCAR | CAR | 55.1% | 1,314 | 2.63 | 2.14 | 4.1%▲3.4 |
| 72 | Kirill KaprizovFMIN | MIN | 55.0% | 725 | 2.47 | 2.02 | 98%▼0.8 |
| 73 | Noah DobsonDNYI | NYI | 55.0% | 1,299 | 2.56 | 2.09 | 97%▼1.3 |
| 74 | Timo MeierFNJD | NJD | 55.0% | 1,204 | 2.67 | 2.19 | 82%▼8 |
| 75 | Jonas SiegenthalerDNJD | NJD | 54.9% | 922 | 2.15 | 1.76 | 3.3%▲2.9 |
| 76 | Jake McCabeDTOR | TOR | 54.9% | 1,164 | 2.48 | 2.04 | 34%▼15 |
| 77 | Alex IafalloFWPG | WPG | 54.9% | 813 | 2.21 | 1.81 | 4.3%▲3 |
| 78 | Brandt ClarkeDLAK | LAK | 54.9% | 1,091 | 2.61 | 2.14 | 96%▲11 |
| 79 | Artem ZubDOTT | OTT | 54.8% | 952 | 2.28 | 1.87 | 10%▲6.1 |
| 80 | Cody GlassFPIT/NJD | PIT/NJD | 54.8% | 741 | 2.19 | 1.80 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 81 | Jake GuentzelFTBL | TBL | 54.8% | 1,212 | 2.94 | 2.43 | 100% |
| 82 | Vladislav NamestnikovFWPG | WPG | 54.8% | 981 | 2.43 | 2.00 | 0.1% |
| 83 | Viktor ArvidssonFEDM | EDM | 54.8% | 880 | 2.82 | 2.33 | 32%▲23 |
| 84 | Dylan HollowayFSTL | STL | 54.8% | 1,089 | 2.42 | 1.99 | 95%▲9.2 |
| 85 | A.J. GreerFFLA | FLA | 54.7% | 728 | 2.27 | 1.88 | 7.5%▲5.8 |
| 86 | Zachary BolducFSTL | STL | 54.7% | 804 | 2.16 | 1.79 | 21%▲19 |
| 87 | Gustav ForslingDFLA | FLA | 54.7% | 1,490 | 2.55 | 2.12 | 42%▲18 |
| 88 | Dylan SambergDWPG | WPG | 54.7% | 1,078 | 2.48 | 2.06 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 89 | Victor HedmanDTBL | TBL | 54.6% | 1,366 | 2.77 | 2.30 | 93%▲11 |
| 90 | Jordan StaalFCAR | CAR | 54.6% | 946 | 2.71 | 2.25 | 20%▲13 |
| 91 | Zach WhitecloudDVGK | VGK | 54.5% | 1,201 | 2.47 | 2.06 | 7.3%▲6.7 |
| 92 | Jacob MoverareDLAK | LAK | 54.5% | 567 | 2.32 | 1.93 | 0.0% |
| 93 | Jayden StrubleDMTL | MTL | 54.5% | 792 | 2.49 | 2.08 | 3.3%▲2.9 |
| 94 | Cole PerfettiFWPG | WPG | 54.5% | 1,070 | 2.38 | 1.99 | 36%▲32 |
| 95 | Darnell NurseDEDM | EDM | 54.4% | 1,429 | 2.64 | 2.21 | 70%▼12 |
| 96 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 54.3% | 1,567 | 2.56 | 2.15 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 97 | Joel Eriksson EkFMIN | MIN | 54.3% | 623 | 2.26 | 1.90 | 82%▲11 |
| 98 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 54.3% | 972 | 2.87 | 2.42 | 100%▲4.5 |
| 99 | Kirill MarchenkoFCBJ | CBJ | 54.2% | 1,181 | 2.87 | 2.43 | 98%▲7 |
| 100 | Matthew KniesFTOR | TOR | 54.2% | 1,088 | 2.73 | 2.31 | 94%▲14 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 325 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Read it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
How reliable is it?
Shares the stability of on-ice xGF%. The flurry discount itself is mechanical (no fitted parameters), so it adds no noise.
How Sequence xG is calculated →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 xGF%50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
- Shot DietExpected goals per unblocked attempt. League average is about 0.06-0.07; 0.10+ is an elite diet.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.