On-ice results
Sequence xG (sxGF%) Leaders
2024-25All situationsThrough 82 team games
Plain expected goals add up every shot in a scramble as if each one were a fresh chance, even though only one goal can come out of it. Sequence xG discounts each follow-up attempt by the chance the play was already over: a shot worth 0.30 after a 0.25 rebound counts as 0.30 × 0.75.
That takes about 5.5% out of the league total, but it moves individual players much more: skaters whose lines live on second and third whacks drop, and clean one-shot rush lines rise.
Leader in 2024-25: Jackson Blake (CAR), 66.8% sxGF%.
Sequence xG leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson BlakeFCAR | CAR | 66.8% | 1,108 | 3.77 | 1.87 | 68%▲21 |
| 2 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 66.8% | 1,528 | 4.81 | 2.39 | 100% |
| 3 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 65.6% | 1,476 | 4.75 | 2.49 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 4 | Shayne GostisbehereDCAR | CAR | 64.9% | 1,296 | 4.16 | 2.25 | 96%▲16 |
| 5 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 64.7% | 1,296 | 4.51 | 2.47 | 100% |
| 6 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 64.6% | 1,379 | 4.47 | 2.45 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 7 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 64.3% | 1,800 | 4.75 | 2.64 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 8 | Mackie SamoskevichFFLA | FLA | 64.3% | 959 | 3.45 | 1.92 | — |
| 9 | Tomas HertlFVGK | VGK | 64.2% | 1,250 | 4.14 | 2.31 | 83%▲2.9 |
| 10 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 63.6% | 1,924 | 4.20 | 2.40 | 100% |
| 11 | Victor OlofssonFVGK | VGK | 63.5% | 812 | 3.08 | 1.77 | 12%▲12 |
| 12 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 63.5% | 1,653 | 4.63 | 2.66 | 100% |
| 13 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 63.0% | 1,313 | 4.04 | 2.38 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 14 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 62.9% | 948 | 4.48 | 2.65 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 15 | Mathew BarzalFNYI | NYI | 62.8% | 610 | 4.05 | 2.40 | 83%▲10 |
| 16 | Kirill KaprizovFMIN | MIN | 62.6% | 921 | 3.79 | 2.26 | 98%▼0.8 |
| 17 | Nikolaj EhlersFWPG | WPG | 62.5% | 1,090 | 3.99 | 2.39 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 18 | Martin NecasFCAR/COL | CAR/COL | 62.5% | 1,501 | 4.30 | 2.58 | 100%▲1.3 |
| 19 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 62.4% | 1,355 | 3.63 | 2.18 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 20 | Cole PerfettiFWPG | WPG | 62.4% | 1,245 | 3.24 | 1.95 | 36%▲32 |
| 21 | Dougie HamiltonDNJD | NJD | 62.3% | 1,271 | 4.08 | 2.46 | 84%▲12 |
| 22 | Kevin FialaFLAK | LAK | 62.3% | 1,500 | 3.51 | 2.13 | 67%▼8.4 |
| 23 | Shea TheodoreDVGK | VGK | 62.3% | 1,473 | 3.64 | 2.21 | 91%▲28 |
| 24 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 62.0% | 1,447 | 4.12 | 2.52 | 73%▲1 |
| 25 | Jake GuentzelFTBL | TBL | 61.9% | 1,599 | 4.32 | 2.65 | 100% |
| 26 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 61.5% | 1,271 | 4.02 | 2.52 | 93%▲9 |
| 27 | Brayden PointFTBL | TBL | 61.5% | 1,500 | 4.40 | 2.76 | 95%▲7.7 |
| 28 | Josh DoanFUTA | UTA | 61.5% | 689 | 2.98 | 1.87 | 61%▲44 |
| 29 | Mikko RantanenFCOL/DAL/CAR | COL/DAL/CAR | 61.4% | 1,742 | 4.49 | 2.83 | 99%▲0.7 |
| 30 | Jesperi KotkaniemiFCAR | CAR | 60.9% | 1,097 | 3.16 | 2.03 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 31 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 60.8% | 1,588 | 4.48 | 2.88 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 32 | Vinnie HinostrozaFMIN/NSH | MIN/NSH | 60.7% | 495 | 2.92 | 1.89 | 0.0% |
| 33 | Nate SchmidtDFLA | FLA | 60.7% | 1,322 | 2.84 | 1.84 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 34 | Jesper BrattFNJD | NJD | 60.7% | 1,535 | 4.29 | 2.78 | 96%▲11 |
| 35 | Clayton KellerFUTA | UTA | 60.6% | 1,549 | 3.97 | 2.58 | 100%▲2 |
| 36 | Andrei SvechnikovFCAR | CAR | 60.6% | 1,232 | 4.29 | 2.79 | 97%▲8.5 |
| 37 | Dylan GuentherFUTA | UTA | 60.5% | 1,190 | 3.96 | 2.58 | 99%▲2 |
| 38 | Tim StützleFOTT | OTT | 60.5% | 1,625 | 3.66 | 2.39 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 39 | Jason RobertsonFDAL | DAL | 60.5% | 1,459 | 4.09 | 2.67 | 100%▲0.5 |
| 40 | Alex LaferriereFLAK | LAK | 60.5% | 1,273 | 3.23 | 2.11 | 68%▲3.5 |
| 41 | Seth JarvisFCAR | CAR | 60.4% | 1,413 | 4.22 | 2.77 | 95%▲1.5 |
| 42 | Brandon HagelFTBL | TBL | 60.2% | 1,701 | 4.02 | 2.65 | 100%▲1.9 |
| 43 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 60.2% | 1,357 | 4.09 | 2.71 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 44 | Quinn HughesDVAN | VAN | 60.1% | 1,750 | 3.46 | 2.30 | 100% |
| 45 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 60.0% | 1,258 | 3.92 | 2.61 | 100%▲4.5 |
| 46 | Zachary BolducFSTL | STL | 60.0% | 922 | 2.67 | 1.78 | 21%▲19 |
| 47 | Jordan KyrouFSTL | STL | 59.9% | 1,434 | 3.46 | 2.31 | 79%▲2.9 |
| 48 | Stefan NoesenFNJD | NJD | 59.6% | 1,243 | 3.72 | 2.52 | 0.1% |
| 49 | Drake BathersonFOTT | OTT | 59.6% | 1,488 | 3.63 | 2.46 | 97%▲7.4 |
| 50 | Sam BennettFFLA | FLA | 59.4% | 1,326 | 3.90 | 2.66 | 83%▲4 |
| 51 | Jonathan DrouinFCOL | COL | 59.3% | 782 | 3.84 | 2.63 | 0.5% |
| 52 | Nick SchmaltzFUTA | UTA | 59.3% | 1,524 | 4.05 | 2.78 | 94%▲4.7 |
| 53 | Brandt ClarkeDLAK | LAK | 59.2% | 1,270 | 3.14 | 2.16 | 96%▲11 |
| 54 | Mats ZuccarelloFMIN | MIN | 59.2% | 1,356 | 3.53 | 2.43 | 50%▲28 |
| 55 | Ross ColtonFCOL | COL | 59.1% | 880 | 3.20 | 2.21 | 8.1%▲7.8 |
| 56 | Lucas RaymondFDET | DET | 59.0% | 1,540 | 3.98 | 2.76 | 96%▲10 |
| 57 | Alex TurcotteFLAK | LAK | 59.0% | 798 | 2.63 | 1.83 | 8.8%▲8.8 |
| 58 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 59.0% | 1,620 | 3.77 | 2.62 | 99% |
| 59 | Kirill MarchenkoFCBJ | CBJ | 59.0% | 1,468 | 3.85 | 2.67 | 98%▲7 |
| 60 | Dylan HollowayFSTL | STL | 59.0% | 1,295 | 3.07 | 2.13 | 95%▲9.2 |
| 61 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 58.9% | 1,581 | 4.13 | 2.88 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 62 | Alex DeBrincatFDET | DET | 58.9% | 1,465 | 3.86 | 2.69 | 100%▲2.6 |
| 63 | Corey PerryFEDM | EDM | 58.9% | 967 | 3.28 | 2.29 | 7.4%▲5.9 |
| 64 | Andrei KuzmenkoFCGY/LAK/PHI | CGY/LAK/PHI | 58.9% | 1,032 | 3.12 | 2.18 | 11%▲9.8 |
| 65 | Adam GaudetteFOTT | OTT | 58.8% | 844 | 2.79 | 1.95 | 0.1% |
| 66 | Bobby BrinkFPHI | PHI | 58.8% | 1,172 | 3.13 | 2.19 | 14%▲12 |
| 67 | Matt BoldyFMIN | MIN | 58.7% | 1,664 | 3.59 | 2.53 | 100% |
| 68 | Vladislav NamestnikovFWPG | WPG | 58.6% | 1,177 | 3.01 | 2.12 | 0.1% |
| 69 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 58.6% | 1,406 | 3.92 | 2.77 | 54%▲37 |
| 70 | Maxim TsyplakovFNYI | NYI | 58.6% | 1,152 | 2.94 | 2.08 | 14% |
| 71 | Timo MeierFNJD | NJD | 58.5% | 1,429 | 3.53 | 2.50 | 82%▼8 |
| 72 | Logan StankovenFDAL/CAR | DAL/CAR | 58.4% | 1,177 | 3.59 | 2.56 | 67%▲42 |
| 73 | Pierre-Luc DuboisFWSH | WSH | 58.1% | 1,419 | 3.62 | 2.61 | 41%▲32 |
| 74 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 58.0% | 1,951 | 3.47 | 2.51 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 75 | Gabriel VilardiFWPG | WPG | 58.0% | 1,288 | 3.65 | 2.64 | 80%▲7.7 |
| 76 | Erik GustafssonDDET | DET | 57.9% | 979 | 2.90 | 2.11 | 3.2%▲3.2 |
| 77 | Tommy NovakFNSH/PIT | NSH/PIT | 57.9% | 714 | 3.08 | 2.24 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 78 | Viktor ArvidssonFEDM | EDM | 57.9% | 1,005 | 3.23 | 2.35 | 32%▲23 |
| 79 | David PastrnakFBOS | BOS | 57.8% | 1,655 | 3.93 | 2.87 | 100%▲1.2 |
| 80 | Cale MakarDCOL | COL | 57.8% | 2,057 | 4.07 | 2.98 | 100%▲1 |
| 81 | Nico HischierFNJD | NJD | 57.7% | 1,529 | 4.11 | 3.02 | 98%▲3 |
| 82 | Mason MarchmentFDAL | DAL | 57.6% | 951 | 3.81 | 2.81 | 47%▲34 |
| 83 | Mark ScheifeleFWPG | WPG | 57.6% | 1,676 | 3.76 | 2.77 | 100% |
| 84 | Victor HedmanDTBL | TBL | 57.5% | 1,823 | 3.80 | 2.81 | 93%▲11 |
| 85 | Barrett HaytonFUTA | UTA | 57.5% | 1,320 | 3.64 | 2.69 | 11%▲11 |
| 86 | Alex OvechkinFWSH | WSH | 57.5% | 1,152 | 4.09 | 3.03 | 96%▲1.3 |
| 87 | Jordan SpenceDLAK | LAK | 57.4% | 1,326 | 2.73 | 2.03 | 21%▲17 |
| 88 | Tom WilsonFWSH | WSH | 57.3% | 1,517 | 3.74 | 2.79 | 95%▲6.5 |
| 89 | Artemi PanarinFNYR | NYR | 57.1% | 1,575 | 3.95 | 2.96 | 98%▼1.2 |
| 90 | William KarlssonFVGK | VGK | 57.1% | 902 | 3.13 | 2.35 | 24%▲20 |
| 91 | Jakob ChychrunDWSH | WSH | 57.1% | 1,559 | 3.33 | 2.51 | 99%▼0.6 |
| 92 | Darren RaddyshDTBL | TBL | 57.0% | 1,263 | 3.28 | 2.47 | 100%▲3.5 |
| 93 | Ivan BarbashevFVGK | VGK | 57.0% | 1,176 | 3.20 | 2.41 | 67%▲26 |
| 94 | William NylanderFTOR | TOR | 57.0% | 1,600 | 4.16 | 3.14 | 99%▼0.9 |
| 95 | Dylan LarkinFDET | DET | 56.9% | 1,646 | 3.91 | 2.96 | 96% |
| 96 | Matt DucheneFDAL | DAL | 56.8% | 1,406 | 3.99 | 3.03 | 62%▼17 |
| 97 | Kyle ConnorFWPG | WPG | 56.7% | 1,672 | 3.76 | 2.86 | 99%▲1 |
| 98 | Brad MarchandFBOS/FLA | BOS/FLA | 56.7% | 1,301 | 3.90 | 2.97 | 73%▲0.9 |
| 99 | Uvis BalinskisDFLA | FLA | 56.7% | 1,129 | 2.57 | 1.96 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 100 | Conor GarlandFVAN | VAN | 56.7% | 1,511 | 3.30 | 2.53 | 10%▲7.4 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 307 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
Read it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
How reliable is it?
Shares the stability of on-ice xGF%. The flurry discount itself is mechanical (no fitted parameters), so it adds no noise.
How Sequence xG is calculated →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 xGF%50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
- Shot DietExpected goals per unblocked attempt. League average is about 0.06-0.07; 0.10+ is an elite diet.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.