On-ice results
5v5 Expected Goals Share (xGF%) Leaders
2026-27All situationsThrough 3 team games
Expected goals share is the best single on-ice number for "does the play tilt toward the right net when this player is out there?" It weighs every unblocked shot attempt by its chance of scoring, so a point shot through traffic counts for less than a backdoor tap-in.
The board ranks the share, not the raw total, and uses only 5-on-5 play, where every team has the same number of skaters. Rows below the ice-time minimum are hidden; it rises as the season goes on.
Leader in 2026-27: Leon Draisaitl (EDM), 86.3% xGF%.
- Early sample: teams have played at most 3 games in 2026-27. Expect big swings.
5v5 xGF% leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 86.3% | 42 | 6.96 | 1.10 | 100% |
| 2 | Vasily PodkolzinFEDM | EDM | 85.1% | 36 | 6.93 | 1.21 | 64%▲55 |
| 3 | Mikhail SergachevDUTA | UTA | 82.4% | 23 | 4.35 | 0.93 | 98%▲5.2 |
| 4 | Macklin CelebriniFSJS | SJS | 81.9% | 23 | 5.62 | 1.24 | 100%▲0.9 |
| 5 | Jack RoslovicFTOR | TOR | 81.4% | 33 | 3.25 | 0.74 | 34%▲26 |
| 6 | Tomas HertlFVGK | VGK | 80.7% | 33 | 5.78 | 1.38 | 83%▲2.9 |
| 7 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 80.2% | 36 | 3.87 | 0.96 | 73%▲1 |
| 8 | Andrei SvechnikovFCAR | CAR | 79.0% | 36 | 5.94 | 1.58 | 97%▲8.5 |
| 9 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 78.9% | 50 | 5.16 | 1.38 | 100% |
| 10 | Mark ScheifeleFWPG | WPG | 78.6% | 23 | 6.57 | 1.78 | 100% |
| 11 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 78.6% | 40 | 4.72 | 1.29 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 12 | Sam BennettFFLA | FLA | 77.5% | 40 | 3.71 | 1.08 | 83%▲4 |
| 13 | Nikolaj EhlersFCAR | CAR | 76.1% | 38 | 4.86 | 1.52 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 14 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 75.9% | 42 | 4.30 | 1.37 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 15 | Shea TheodoreDVGK | VGK | 75.4% | 46 | 5.34 | 1.74 | 91%▲28 |
| 16 | Quinn HughesDMIN | MIN | 74.4% | 28 | 3.71 | 1.28 | 100% |
| 17 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 74.1% | 26 | 6.85 | 2.39 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 18 | Victor OlofssonFVGK | VGK | 73.5% | 27 | 5.33 | 1.93 | 12%▲12 |
| 19 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 73.4% | 38 | 5.05 | 1.83 | 93%▲9 |
| 20 | Brady TkachukFFLA | FLA | 73.4% | 36 | 3.62 | 1.31 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 21 | Mitch MarnerFVGK | VGK | 72.7% | 44 | 3.28 | 1.23 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 22 | Brandon MontourDSEA | SEA | 72.4% | 24 | 4.35 | 1.66 | 83%▲10 |
| 23 | Luke HughesDNJD | NJD | 72.1% | 24 | 5.81 | 2.25 | 84%▲40 |
| 24 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 72.1% | 45 | 5.38 | 2.08 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 25 | Jackson BlakeFCAR | CAR | 71.3% | 41 | 4.85 | 1.95 | 68%▲21 |
| 26 | Brett HowdenFVGK | VGK | 69.8% | 32 | 2.86 | 1.24 | 15%▲15 |
| 27 | William KarlssonFVGK | VGK | 69.7% | 38 | 2.99 | 1.30 | 24%▲20 |
| 28 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 69.5% | 30 | 2.69 | 1.18 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 29 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 69.4% | 26 | 4.62 | 2.04 | 100% |
| 30 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 68.8% | 40 | 4.91 | 2.23 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 31 | Lars EllerFFLA | FLA | 67.6% | 27 | 2.33 | 1.12 | 0.2% |
| 32 | Mike MathesonDMTL | MTL | 66.0% | 25 | 5.89 | 3.03 | 85%▼7.5 |
| 33 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 65.9% | 45 | 3.21 | 1.66 | 99% |
| 34 | Brayden McNabbDVGK | VGK | 65.9% | 37 | 4.56 | 2.36 | 23%▲20 |
| 35 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 65.6% | 42 | 3.24 | 1.70 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 36 | Seth JonesDFLA | FLA | 64.9% | 57 | 3.34 | 1.81 | 80%▲32 |
| 37 | Vladislav GavrikovDNYR | NYR | 64.4% | 64 | 3.59 | 1.98 | 41%▼5.7 |
| 38 | Ivan BarbashevFVGK | VGK | 64.4% | 30 | 3.58 | 1.98 | 67%▲26 |
| 39 | J.T. MillerFNYR | NYR | 63.9% | 49 | 5.36 | 3.03 | 92%▲7.9 |
| 40 | Oliver BjorkstrandFNYR | NYR | 63.8% | 40 | 3.32 | 1.89 | 20% |
| 41 | Denton MateychukDCBJ | CBJ | 63.4% | 27 | 3.69 | 2.13 | 42%▲40 |
| 42 | Jordan StaalFCAR | CAR | 63.3% | 32 | 3.09 | 1.79 | 20%▲13 |
| 43 | Matthew SchaeferDNYI | NYI | 62.7% | 28 | 2.59 | 1.54 | 100% |
| 44 | Brock BoeserFVAN | VAN | 62.5% | 33 | 2.48 | 1.49 | 63%▼5.5 |
| 45 | Shayne GostisbehereDCAR | CAR | 62.0% | 42 | 4.01 | 2.46 | 96%▲16 |
| 46 | Hampus LindholmDBOS | BOS | 61.9% | 40 | 4.89 | 3.01 | 16%▲15 |
| 47 | Rasmus DahlinDBUF | BUF | 61.8% | 26 | 3.10 | 1.91 | 100%▲1 |
| 48 | Morgan RiellyDTOR | TOR | 60.7% | 41 | 3.22 | 2.08 | 76%▼4.7 |
| 49 | Kirill MarchenkoFTOR | TOR | 60.6% | 38 | 4.34 | 2.82 | 98%▲7 |
| 50 | Casey MittelstadtFBOS | BOS | 60.2% | 29 | 4.02 | 2.66 | 14%▲12 |
| 51 | Sandis VilmanisFFLA | FLA | 60.1% | 24 | 3.73 | 2.48 | 6.4%▲6.3 |
| 52 | Alexis LafrenièreFNYR | NYR | 59.9% | 55 | 3.79 | 2.54 | 82%▲13 |
| 53 | Kasperi KapanenFEDM | EDM | 59.5% | 37 | 4.66 | 3.17 | 7.5%▲7.2 |
| 54 | Jake WalmanDEDM | EDM | 58.1% | 29 | 3.16 | 2.28 | 33%▲30 |
| 55 | Will BorgenDBOS | BOS | 57.8% | 37 | 4.46 | 3.26 | 4.1%▲3.8 |
| 56 | Mika ZibanejadFNYR | NYR | 57.6% | 59 | 3.93 | 2.89 | 98%▲1.1 |
| 57 | Fraser MintenFBOS | BOS | 57.6% | 32 | 4.07 | 3.00 | 45%▲35 |
| 58 | David PastrnakFBOS | BOS | 57.5% | 40 | 3.35 | 2.48 | 100%▲1.2 |
| 59 | Elias LindholmFBOS | BOS | 57.2% | 32 | 3.30 | 2.47 | 43%▲4.6 |
| 60 | Gabe PerreaultFNYR | NYR | 56.7% | 43 | 2.58 | 1.97 | 53%▲47 |
| 61 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 56.6% | 43 | 4.33 | 3.32 | 99% |
| 62 | Philip BrobergDSTL | STL | 56.2% | 23 | 4.19 | 3.26 | 66%▲50 |
| 63 | Marco RossiFVAN | VAN | 55.7% | 30 | 3.99 | 3.18 | 58%▲12 |
| 64 | Logan StankovenFCAR | CAR | 55.5% | 40 | 3.92 | 3.14 | 67%▲42 |
| 65 | Eeli TolvanenFNYR | NYR | 55.3% | 40 | 3.33 | 2.69 | 36%▼9.4 |
| 66 | Cam FowlerDSTL | STL | 55.3% | 23 | 2.35 | 1.90 | 14%▲1.8 |
| 67 | Mason LohreiDBOS | BOS | 54.9% | 41 | 2.72 | 2.24 | 22%▲21 |
| 68 | Rasmus AnderssonDVGK | VGK | 54.8% | 38 | 2.72 | 2.24 | 95%▼3 |
| 69 | Jonathan AspirotDBOS | BOS | 54.7% | 33 | 2.06 | 1.71 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 70 | Bo HorvatFNYI | NYI | 54.4% | 23 | 3.00 | 2.52 | 91%▲1.7 |
| 71 | Dylan DeMeloDWPG | WPG | 54.4% | 23 | 3.74 | 3.14 | 5.6%▲5.4 |
| 72 | Pavel DorofeyevFNYR | NYR | 53.9% | 47 | 4.23 | 3.62 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 73 | Sean DurziDNYR | NYR | 53.8% | 63 | 2.64 | 2.27 | 37%▲35 |
| 74 | Ryan SheaDEDM | EDM | 53.6% | 46 | 3.10 | 2.68 | 15%▲9.6 |
| 75 | Robert ThomasFSTL | STL | 53.2% | 23 | 3.64 | 3.20 | 93%▲20 |
| 76 | JJ PeterkaFBOS | BOS | 52.9% | 38 | 3.20 | 2.85 | 75%▲36 |
| 77 | Marat KhusnutdinovFBOS | BOS | 52.8% | 29 | 3.34 | 2.99 | 11%▲11 |
| 78 | Owen PowerDBUF | BUF | 52.7% | 25 | 2.43 | 2.18 | 53%▲29 |
| 79 | Noah HanifinDVGK | VGK | 52.7% | 38 | 2.30 | 2.06 | 52%▼23 |
| 80 | Radko GudasDFLA | FLA | 52.6% | 24 | 2.32 | 2.10 | 25%▲22 |
| 81 | Adam FoxDNYR | NYR | 52.2% | 60 | 3.89 | 3.57 | 99%▲6.5 |
| 82 | Tristan LuneauDANA | ANA | 51.6% | 27 | 3.27 | 3.07 | 29%▲29 |
| 83 | Morgan GeekieFBOS | BOS | 50.9% | 37 | 3.93 | 3.79 | 97%▲8.6 |
| 84 | Marcus PetterssonDNYR | NYR | 50.7% | 67 | 2.80 | 2.72 | 5.8%▲5.4 |
| 85 | Travis KonecnyFPHI | PHI | 49.9% | 32 | 3.20 | 3.21 | 92%▲9.9 |
| 86 | Jake McCabeDTOR | TOR | 49.9% | 32 | 2.03 | 2.04 | 34%▼15 |
| 87 | Easton CowanFTOR | TOR | 49.6% | 29 | 3.45 | 3.52 | 50%▲47 |
| 88 | Braeden BowmanFVGK | VGK | 49.4% | 23 | 3.58 | 3.66 | 16%▲16 |
| 89 | Eetu LuostarinenFFLA | FLA | 49.1% | 30 | 4.89 | 5.06 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 90 | Jordan MartinookFCAR | CAR | 49.0% | 27 | 1.85 | 1.93 | 4.3%▲2.7 |
| 91 | Parker WotherspoonDVGK | VGK | 48.6% | 36 | 2.55 | 2.69 | 20%▲19 |
| 92 | Sean KuralyFBOS | BOS | 48.2% | 26 | 1.57 | 1.69 | 0.1% |
| 93 | Jeremy LauzonDVGK | VGK | 48.1% | 34 | 2.37 | 2.56 | 24%▲22 |
| 94 | Aaron EkbladDFLA | FLA | 47.6% | 42 | 3.17 | 3.50 | 50%▲34 |
| 95 | Jaccob SlavinDCAR | CAR | 47.5% | 41 | 2.25 | 2.49 | 15%▲3.8 |
| 96 | Braden SchneiderDNYR | NYR | 47.3% | 52 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 19%▲17 |
| 97 | Neal PionkDWPG | WPG | 47.2% | 25 | 2.48 | 2.77 | 32%▲31 |
| 98 | James HagensFBOS | BOS | 46.9% | 28 | 2.11 | 2.39 | 50%▲42 |
| 99 | Zach WerenskiDCBJ | CBJ | 46.8% | 29 | 2.59 | 2.95 | 100% |
| 100 | Connor MurphyDEDM | EDM | 46.5% | 43 | 2.71 | 3.12 | 5.9%▲5 |
Minimum sample: 23 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 369 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
How reliable is it?
On-ice xGF% is moderately repeatable: split-half r ≈ 0.29 at about 7 xG per half. Treat gaps of 2-3 points between players as noise before about 500 minutes.
How our expected goals model works →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.
- Sequence xGRead it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.