On-ice results
5v5 Expected Goals Share (xGF%) Leaders
2026-275-on-5Through 2 team games
Expected goals share is the best single on-ice number for "does the play tilt toward the right net when this player is out there?" It weighs every unblocked shot attempt by its chance of scoring, so a point shot through traffic counts for less than a backdoor tap-in.
The board ranks the share, not the raw total, and uses only 5-on-5 play, where every team has the same number of skaters. Rows below the ice-time minimum are hidden; it rises as the season goes on.
Leader in 2026-27: Brett Howden (VGK), 97.1% xGF%.
- Early sample: teams have played at most 2 games in 2026-27. Expect big swings.
5v5 xGF% leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brett HowdenFVGK | VGK | 97.1% | 16 | 3.45 | 0.10 | 15%▲15 |
| 2 | Kaedan KorczakDPIT | PIT | 88.6% | 16 | 3.73 | 0.48 | 6.7%▲6.5 |
| 3 | Samuel GirardDPIT | PIT | 87.5% | 17 | 3.84 | 0.55 | 8.2%▲7.8 |
| 4 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 86.8% | 29 | 4.99 | 0.76 | 100% |
| 5 | Kris LetangDPIT | PIT | 85.4% | 17 | 3.34 | 0.57 | 46%▼16 |
| 6 | Luke HughesDNJD | NJD | 85.0% | 17 | 5.72 | 1.01 | 84%▲40 |
| 7 | Arseny GritsyukFNJD | NJD | 83.8% | 15 | 4.53 | 0.87 | 22%▲21 |
| 8 | MacKenzie WeegarDUTA | UTA | 83.4% | 19 | 5.28 | 1.05 | 93%▼6.8 |
| 9 | Clayton KellerFUTA | UTA | 82.6% | 16 | 2.96 | 0.62 | 100%▲2 |
| 10 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 81.6% | 26 | 2.69 | 0.61 | 73%▲1 |
| 11 | Vasily PodkolzinFEDM | EDM | 80.0% | 27 | 5.24 | 1.31 | 64%▲55 |
| 12 | Sam BennettFFLA | FLA | 79.1% | 27 | 2.27 | 0.60 | 83%▲4 |
| 13 | Dougie HamiltonDNJD | NJD | 78.8% | 17 | 4.66 | 1.26 | 84%▲12 |
| 14 | Jack RoslovicFTOR | TOR | 78.7% | 26 | 2.63 | 0.71 | 34%▲26 |
| 15 | Mikhail SergachevDUTA | UTA | 78.6% | 18 | 4.26 | 1.16 | 98%▲5.2 |
| 16 | Kirill MarchenkoFTOR | TOR | 77.3% | 27 | 3.36 | 0.99 | 98%▲7 |
| 17 | Trevor van RiemsdykDPIT | PIT | 76.0% | 17 | 3.04 | 0.96 | 0.8% |
| 18 | Brandon MontourDSEA | SEA | 74.8% | 18 | 4.05 | 1.36 | 83%▲10 |
| 19 | Brett PesceDNJD | NJD | 74.7% | 18 | 3.80 | 1.29 | 0.3% |
| 20 | Ryker EvansDSEA | SEA | 74.6% | 18 | 4.44 | 1.51 | 14%▲13 |
| 21 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 74.5% | 18 | 3.66 | 1.25 | 100% |
| 22 | Shea TheodoreDVGK | VGK | 74.1% | 16 | 3.50 | 1.22 | 91%▲28 |
| 23 | Radko GudasDFLA | FLA | 74.0% | 22 | 2.52 | 0.88 | 25%▲22 |
| 24 | Mitch MarnerFVGK | VGK | 73.8% | 16 | 1.67 | 0.59 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 25 | Elias PetterssonDVAN | VAN | 72.9% | 26 | 2.30 | 0.85 | 13%▲13 |
| 26 | Anthony ManthaFNJD | NJD | 72.2% | 15 | 3.78 | 1.46 | 53%▲16 |
| 27 | Dmitri SimashevDUTA | UTA | 72.1% | 15 | 4.73 | 1.83 | 20%▲20 |
| 28 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 71.9% | 37 | 3.39 | 1.32 | 100% |
| 29 | Dmitry KulikovDFLA | FLA | 71.2% | 25 | 2.68 | 1.08 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 30 | Jonas SiegenthalerDNJD | NJD | 71.0% | 19 | 3.60 | 1.47 | 3.3%▲2.9 |
| 31 | Noah HanifinDVGK | VGK | 71.0% | 17 | 3.91 | 1.60 | 52%▼23 |
| 32 | Matthew SchaeferDNYI | NYI | 70.9% | 19 | 2.01 | 0.83 | 100% |
| 33 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 70.8% | 25 | 1.45 | 0.60 | 99% |
| 34 | Brett KulakDCOL | COL | 70.6% | 16 | 4.03 | 1.68 | 0.3% |
| 35 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 70.6% | 16 | 0.85 | 0.36 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 36 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 70.3% | 22 | 2.40 | 1.01 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 37 | Eetu LuostarinenFFLA | FLA | 70.2% | 22 | 3.86 | 1.64 | 11%▲9.1 |
| 38 | Brayden McNabbDVGK | VGK | 70.2% | 17 | 3.68 | 1.56 | 23%▲20 |
| 39 | Seth JonesDFLA | FLA | 70.0% | 35 | 2.39 | 1.02 | 80%▲32 |
| 40 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 70.0% | 36 | 3.10 | 1.33 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 41 | Aaron EkbladDFLA | FLA | 69.7% | 23 | 2.15 | 0.93 | 50%▲34 |
| 42 | Brady TkachukFFLA | FLA | 69.7% | 22 | 1.50 | 0.65 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 43 | Luke SchennDVAN | VAN | 68.9% | 25 | 2.71 | 1.22 | 7.3%▲6.9 |
| 44 | Jeremy LauzonDVGK | VGK | 68.7% | 15 | 3.85 | 1.75 | 24%▲22 |
| 45 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 68.7% | 30 | 3.01 | 1.37 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 46 | Anton LundellFFLA | FLA | 67.3% | 21 | 4.87 | 2.37 | 45%▲30 |
| 47 | Nate SchmidtDUTA | UTA | 67.1% | 16 | 3.20 | 1.57 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 48 | Hampus LindholmDBOS | BOS | 66.6% | 17 | 4.38 | 2.20 | 16%▲15 |
| 49 | Andrew PeekeDUTA | UTA | 66.0% | 15 | 2.44 | 1.26 | 6.5%▲6.2 |
| 50 | Olli MaattaDMIN | MIN | 66.0% | 16 | 3.09 | 1.59 | 0.2% |
| 51 | Niko MikkolaDFLA | FLA | 65.1% | 36 | 2.33 | 1.25 | 4.9%▲4.4 |
| 52 | Ryan SheaDEDM | EDM | 64.9% | 36 | 3.02 | 1.64 | 15%▲9.6 |
| 53 | Jared SpurgeonDMIN | MIN | 64.8% | 15 | 2.93 | 1.59 | 9.3%▲7.4 |
| 54 | David PastrnakFBOS | BOS | 64.4% | 16 | 3.27 | 1.81 | 100%▲1.2 |
| 55 | JJ PeterkaFBOS | BOS | 63.9% | 15 | 3.27 | 1.85 | 75%▲36 |
| 56 | Mike MathesonDMTL | MTL | 63.7% | 18 | 3.90 | 2.22 | 85%▼7.5 |
| 57 | Will BorgenDBOS | BOS | 63.4% | 17 | 3.82 | 2.21 | 4.1%▲3.8 |
| 58 | Easton CowanFTOR | TOR | 63.2% | 21 | 2.74 | 1.60 | 50%▲47 |
| 59 | Vince DunnDSEA | SEA | 63.1% | 16 | 3.42 | 2.00 | 88%▲11 |
| 60 | Adam LarssonDSEA | SEA | 62.5% | 17 | 3.56 | 2.13 | 22%▼19 |
| 61 | Quinn HughesDMIN | MIN | 62.4% | 21 | 2.74 | 1.65 | 100% |
| 62 | Trent FredericFEDM | EDM | 62.3% | 16 | 2.75 | 1.66 | 4.0%▲3.8 |
| 63 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 62.1% | 28 | 3.18 | 1.94 | 99% |
| 64 | Morgan GeekieFBOS | BOS | 62.0% | 15 | 3.78 | 2.32 | 97%▲8.6 |
| 65 | J.T. MillerFNYR | NYR | 61.5% | 25 | 3.68 | 2.30 | 92%▲7.9 |
| 66 | Ryan WintertonFSEA | SEA | 61.1% | 16 | 3.63 | 2.30 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 67 | Teddy BluegerFTOR | TOR | 60.6% | 16 | 1.36 | 0.88 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 68 | Sandis VilmanisFFLA | FLA | 60.1% | 24 | 3.75 | 2.49 | 6.4%▲6.3 |
| 69 | Denton MateychukDCBJ | CBJ | 59.2% | 23 | 2.43 | 1.67 | 42%▲40 |
| 70 | Owen PowerDBUF | BUF | 58.9% | 21 | 2.23 | 1.56 | 53%▲29 |
| 71 | Oliver BjorkstrandFNYR | NYR | 58.7% | 26 | 3.63 | 2.55 | 20% |
| 72 | Kasperi KapanenFEDM | EDM | 57.3% | 28 | 3.76 | 2.81 | 7.5%▲7.2 |
| 73 | Alexandre CarrierDMTL | MTL | 57.1% | 17 | 3.14 | 2.36 | 14%▲12 |
| 74 | Alex FormentonFEDM | EDM | 57.0% | 27 | 2.37 | 1.79 | 9.6%▲9.6 |
| 75 | Morgan RiellyDTOR | TOR | 56.5% | 32 | 2.74 | 2.11 | 76%▼4.7 |
| 76 | Isaac HowardFEDM | EDM | 56.0% | 18 | 2.28 | 1.79 | 31%▲30 |
| 77 | Vladislav GavrikovDNYR | NYR | 55.9% | 33 | 2.87 | 2.27 | 41%▼5.7 |
| 78 | John MarinoDUTA | UTA | 55.9% | 19 | 2.58 | 2.04 | 18%▲13 |
| 79 | Zach WerenskiDCBJ | CBJ | 55.8% | 21 | 2.52 | 2.00 | 100% |
| 80 | Pavel DorofeyevFNYR | NYR | 55.5% | 25 | 3.80 | 3.05 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 81 | Mikey AndersonDLAK | LAK | 55.3% | 16 | 2.76 | 2.23 | 7.3%▲6.9 |
| 82 | Alexis LafrenièreFNYR | NYR | 55.1% | 28 | 2.13 | 1.74 | 82%▲13 |
| 83 | Martin NecasFCOL | COL | 54.6% | 15 | 2.95 | 2.46 | 100%▲1.3 |
| 84 | Colton SissonsFTOR | TOR | 54.4% | 20 | 1.73 | 1.45 | 3.3%▲3.1 |
| 85 | Mason LohreiDBOS | BOS | 54.4% | 17 | 2.51 | 2.10 | 22%▲21 |
| 86 | Jake MiddletonDCGY | CGY | 54.4% | 16 | 3.49 | 2.93 | 5.7%▲5.3 |
| 87 | Jonathan AspirotDBOS | BOS | 54.3% | 16 | 2.66 | 2.23 | 4.8%▲4.6 |
| 88 | Mika ZibanejadFNYR | NYR | 54.1% | 28 | 2.09 | 1.77 | 98%▲1.1 |
| 89 | Jake WalmanDEDM | EDM | 53.8% | 24 | 2.79 | 2.40 | 33%▲30 |
| 90 | Connor CliftonDBOS | BOS | 52.6% | 22 | 2.01 | 1.81 | 7.4%▲6.7 |
| 91 | Brendan GallagherFVAN | VAN | 52.5% | 20 | 3.10 | 2.81 | 3.3%▲2.8 |
| 92 | Liam OhgrenFVAN | VAN | 50.7% | 28 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 17%▲17 |
| 93 | Brock BoeserFVAN | VAN | 50.6% | 28 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 63%▼5.5 |
| 94 | Eeli TolvanenFNYR | NYR | 50.6% | 23 | 2.31 | 2.25 | 36%▼9.4 |
| 95 | Adam FoxDNYR | NYR | 50.0% | 31 | 2.80 | 2.80 | 99%▲6.5 |
| 96 | Marco RossiFVAN | VAN | 49.6% | 24 | 3.22 | 3.28 | 58%▲12 |
| 97 | Arshdeep BainsFVAN | VAN | 49.3% | 19 | 3.67 | 3.77 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 98 | Nikita ZadorovDBOS | BOS | 49.0% | 21 | 1.85 | 1.92 | 39%▲21 |
| 99 | Frank NazarFCHI | CHI | 48.7% | 28 | 2.53 | 2.66 | 54%▲34 |
| 100 | Jordan GreenwayFCHI | CHI | 48.6% | 25 | 1.85 | 1.95 | 0.3% |
Minimum sample: 15 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 267 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
How reliable is it?
On-ice xGF% is moderately repeatable: split-half r ≈ 0.29 at about 7 xG per half. Treat gaps of 2-3 points between players as noise before about 500 minutes.
How our expected goals model works →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.
- Sequence xGRead it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.