On-ice results
5v5 Expected Goals Share (xGF%) Leaders
2024-255-on-5Through 82 team games
Expected goals share is the best single on-ice number for "does the play tilt toward the right net when this player is out there?" It weighs every unblocked shot attempt by its chance of scoring, so a point shot through traffic counts for less than a backdoor tap-in.
The board ranks the share, not the raw total, and uses only 5-on-5 play, where every team has the same number of skaters. Rows below the ice-time minimum are hidden; it rises as the season goes on.
Leader in 2024-25: Jackson Blake (CAR), 61.3% xGF%.
5v5 xGF% leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson BlakeFCAR | CAR | 61.3% | 914 | 3.12 | 1.97 | 68%▲21 |
| 2 | Leon DraisaitlFEDM | EDM | 61.1% | 1,182 | 3.66 | 2.34 | 100% |
| 3 | Connor McDavidFEDM | EDM | 60.2% | 1,153 | 3.80 | 2.52 | 100%▲1.5 |
| 4 | Aleksander BarkovFFLA | FLA | 60.1% | 936 | 2.78 | 1.85 | 97%▲7.2 |
| 5 | Nathan MacKinnonFCOL | COL | 59.9% | 1,350 | 3.60 | 2.41 | 100%▲0.8 |
| 6 | Mattias EkholmDEDM | EDM | 59.8% | 1,171 | 3.45 | 2.32 | 77%▲9.7 |
| 7 | Zach HymanFEDM | EDM | 59.7% | 1,080 | 3.59 | 2.42 | 98%▼1.4 |
| 8 | Seth JarvisFCAR | CAR | 59.6% | 957 | 3.14 | 2.12 | 95%▲1.5 |
| 9 | Anthony CirelliFTBL | TBL | 59.5% | 1,138 | 3.19 | 2.17 | 51%▲19 |
| 10 | Shayne GostisbehereDCAR | CAR | 59.2% | 994 | 3.23 | 2.23 | 96%▲16 |
| 11 | Josh DoanFUTA | UTA | 58.7% | 600 | 2.65 | 1.86 | 61%▲44 |
| 12 | Brandon HagelFTBL | TBL | 58.7% | 1,232 | 3.12 | 2.19 | 100%▲1.9 |
| 13 | Alex LaferriereFLAK | LAK | 58.6% | 1,086 | 2.82 | 2.00 | 68%▲3.5 |
| 14 | Evan BouchardDEDM | EDM | 58.4% | 1,524 | 3.37 | 2.40 | 100% |
| 15 | Mark JankowskiFNSH/CAR | NSH/CAR | 58.3% | 622 | 2.69 | 1.93 | 0.2% |
| 16 | Nate SchmidtDFLA | FLA | 58.2% | 1,139 | 2.61 | 1.87 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 17 | Jack HughesFNJD | NJD | 58.2% | 952 | 3.15 | 2.26 | 100% |
| 18 | Sam ReinhartFFLA | FLA | 58.2% | 1,122 | 2.56 | 1.84 | 99% |
| 19 | Warren FoegeleFLAK | LAK | 58.2% | 1,098 | 2.65 | 1.91 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 20 | Kevin FialaFLAK | LAK | 58.0% | 1,181 | 2.80 | 2.02 | 67%▼8.4 |
| 21 | Phillip DanaultFLAK | LAK | 57.6% | 1,095 | 2.75 | 2.03 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 22 | Cale MakarDCOL | COL | 57.6% | 1,457 | 3.18 | 2.34 | 100%▲1 |
| 23 | Artturi LehkonenFCOL | COL | 57.5% | 1,100 | 3.28 | 2.43 | 54%▲37 |
| 24 | Robert ThomasFSTL | STL | 57.4% | 1,032 | 3.22 | 2.39 | 93%▲20 |
| 25 | Carter VerhaegheFFLA | FLA | 57.3% | 1,148 | 2.99 | 2.23 | 73%▲1 |
| 26 | Mackie SamoskevichFFLA | FLA | 57.3% | 808 | 2.70 | 2.01 | — |
| 27 | Jordan SpenceDLAK | LAK | 57.2% | 1,147 | 2.53 | 1.89 | 21%▲17 |
| 28 | Nikolaj EhlersFWPG | WPG | 57.1% | 858 | 2.78 | 2.09 | 93%▲7.9 |
| 29 | Matthew TkachukFFLA | FLA | 57.1% | 716 | 3.11 | 2.34 | 100%▲2.7 |
| 30 | Uvis BalinskisDFLA | FLA | 57.0% | 997 | 2.46 | 1.86 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 31 | Barrett HaytonFUTA | UTA | 57.0% | 1,028 | 3.11 | 2.34 | 11%▲11 |
| 32 | Quinton ByfieldFLAK | LAK | 57.0% | 1,141 | 2.65 | 2.00 | 86%▲18 |
| 33 | Mark StoneFVGK | VGK | 56.9% | 953 | 2.97 | 2.25 | 93%▲9 |
| 34 | Vasily PodkolzinFEDM | EDM | 56.9% | 1,009 | 2.75 | 2.08 | 64%▲55 |
| 35 | Brady TkachukFOTT | OTT | 56.8% | 985 | 2.97 | 2.26 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 36 | Sebastian AhoFCAR | CAR | 56.8% | 1,075 | 3.29 | 2.51 | 99%▲0.9 |
| 37 | Sean MonahanFCBJ | CBJ | 56.7% | 743 | 3.11 | 2.38 | 19%▲13 |
| 38 | Victor OlofssonFVGK | VGK | 56.7% | 715 | 2.37 | 1.82 | 12%▲12 |
| 39 | Nikita KucherovFTBL | TBL | 56.6% | 1,263 | 3.44 | 2.64 | 100% |
| 40 | Jesperi KotkaniemiFCAR | CAR | 56.5% | 968 | 2.87 | 2.21 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 41 | Kaedan KorczakDVGK | VGK | 56.4% | 588 | 2.54 | 1.96 | 6.7%▲6.5 |
| 42 | Joel KivirantaFCOL | COL | 56.3% | 854 | 2.31 | 1.79 | 0.1% |
| 43 | Alex TurcotteFLAK | LAK | 56.3% | 737 | 2.45 | 1.90 | 8.8%▲8.8 |
| 44 | Tomas NosekFFLA | FLA | 56.3% | 509 | 2.53 | 1.96 | — |
| 45 | Auston MatthewsFTOR | TOR | 56.2% | 954 | 3.15 | 2.45 | 99% |
| 46 | Jack EichelFVGK | VGK | 56.1% | 1,149 | 3.08 | 2.41 | 99%▲1.4 |
| 47 | Nico HischierFNJD | NJD | 56.1% | 1,073 | 2.88 | 2.25 | 98%▲3 |
| 48 | Pavel DorofeyevFVGK | VGK | 56.0% | 1,124 | 2.77 | 2.17 | 92%▲1.7 |
| 49 | Eric RobinsonFCAR | CAR | 55.9% | 935 | 2.94 | 2.32 | 3.2%▲3.1 |
| 50 | Chris TanevDTOR | TOR | 55.9% | 1,229 | 2.46 | 1.94 | 6.0%▲5 |
| 51 | Vladislav GavrikovDLAK | LAK | 55.9% | 1,537 | 2.42 | 1.90 | 41%▼5.7 |
| 52 | Sean WalkerDCAR | CAR | 55.9% | 1,237 | 2.93 | 2.31 | 60%▼11 |
| 53 | Mikey AndersonDLAK | LAK | 55.8% | 1,429 | 2.33 | 1.85 | 7.3%▲6.9 |
| 54 | William KarlssonFVGK | VGK | 55.8% | 707 | 2.57 | 2.04 | 24%▲20 |
| 55 | Jesper BrattFNJD | NJD | 55.8% | 1,079 | 2.99 | 2.37 | 96%▲11 |
| 56 | Pierre-Luc DuboisFWSH | WSH | 55.7% | 1,147 | 3.00 | 2.38 | 41%▲32 |
| 57 | Morgan BarronFWPG | WPG | 55.7% | 668 | 2.22 | 1.77 | 4.8%▲4.7 |
| 58 | Brayden McNabbDVGK | VGK | 55.7% | 1,439 | 2.65 | 2.11 | 23%▲20 |
| 59 | Devon ToewsDCOL | COL | 55.5% | 1,506 | 2.91 | 2.33 | 60%▼2.3 |
| 60 | Ross ColtonFCOL | COL | 55.5% | 748 | 2.60 | 2.09 | 8.1%▲7.8 |
| 61 | Kirill KaprizovFMIN | MIN | 55.5% | 725 | 2.60 | 2.09 | 98%▼0.8 |
| 62 | Tomas HertlFVGK | VGK | 55.5% | 985 | 2.83 | 2.27 | 83%▲2.9 |
| 63 | Mitch MarnerFTOR | TOR | 55.4% | 1,183 | 2.89 | 2.32 | 99%▲1.1 |
| 64 | Emil AndraeDPHI | PHI | 55.4% | 642 | 2.58 | 2.07 | 8.8%▲8.6 |
| 65 | Jonas SiegenthalerDNJD | NJD | 55.4% | 922 | 2.27 | 1.82 | 3.3%▲2.9 |
| 66 | Alex IafalloFWPG | WPG | 55.4% | 813 | 2.34 | 1.89 | 4.3%▲3 |
| 67 | Timo MeierFNJD | NJD | 55.4% | 1,204 | 2.84 | 2.29 | 82%▼8 |
| 68 | Zachary BolducFSTL | STL | 55.3% | 804 | 2.29 | 1.85 | 21%▲19 |
| 69 | Brandt ClarkeDLAK | LAK | 55.3% | 1,091 | 2.76 | 2.23 | 96%▲11 |
| 70 | Ivan BarbashevFVGK | VGK | 55.3% | 1,070 | 3.01 | 2.44 | 67%▲26 |
| 71 | Dylan HollowayFSTL | STL | 55.3% | 1,089 | 2.56 | 2.07 | 95%▲9.2 |
| 72 | Viktor ArvidssonFEDM | EDM | 55.3% | 880 | 3.00 | 2.43 | 32%▲23 |
| 73 | Noah DobsonDNYI | NYI | 55.2% | 1,299 | 2.69 | 2.18 | 97%▼1.3 |
| 74 | Jordan KyrouFSTL | STL | 55.2% | 1,157 | 2.77 | 2.25 | 79%▲2.9 |
| 75 | Pavel BuchnevichFSTL | STL | 55.1% | 1,090 | 3.08 | 2.51 | 36%▲7.7 |
| 76 | Adam PelechDNYI | NYI | 55.1% | 1,093 | 2.49 | 2.03 | 3.2%▲3 |
| 77 | Vladislav NamestnikovFWPG | WPG | 55.1% | 981 | 2.54 | 2.07 | 0.1% |
| 78 | Martin NecasFCAR/COL | CAR/COL | 55.0% | 1,113 | 3.08 | 2.52 | 100%▲1.3 |
| 79 | Dmitry OrlovDCAR | CAR | 55.0% | 1,316 | 2.70 | 2.21 | 35%▲21 |
| 80 | Gustav ForslingDFLA | FLA | 55.0% | 1,490 | 2.68 | 2.19 | 42%▲18 |
| 81 | Jalen ChatfieldDCAR | CAR | 55.0% | 1,314 | 2.76 | 2.26 | 4.1%▲3.4 |
| 82 | A.J. GreerFFLA | FLA | 55.0% | 728 | 2.39 | 1.96 | 7.5%▲5.8 |
| 83 | Artem ZubDOTT | OTT | 54.9% | 952 | 2.41 | 1.98 | 10%▲6.1 |
| 84 | Jordan MartinookFCAR | CAR | 54.9% | 1,007 | 2.71 | 2.22 | 4.3%▲2.7 |
| 85 | Victor HedmanDTBL | TBL | 54.9% | 1,366 | 2.92 | 2.40 | 93%▲11 |
| 86 | Jake McCabeDTOR | TOR | 54.9% | 1,164 | 2.63 | 2.16 | 34%▼15 |
| 87 | Cody GlassFPIT/NJD | PIT/NJD | 54.8% | 741 | 2.28 | 1.88 | 4.9%▲4.5 |
| 88 | Jacob MoverareDLAK | LAK | 54.8% | 567 | 2.44 | 2.01 | 0.0% |
| 89 | Dylan SambergDWPG | WPG | 54.8% | 1,078 | 2.61 | 2.16 | 4.0%▲3.9 |
| 90 | Cole PerfettiFWPG | WPG | 54.6% | 1,070 | 2.49 | 2.07 | 36%▲32 |
| 91 | Zach WhitecloudDVGK | VGK | 54.5% | 1,201 | 2.59 | 2.16 | 7.3%▲6.7 |
| 92 | Jayden StrubleDMTL | MTL | 54.4% | 792 | 2.64 | 2.21 | 3.3%▲2.9 |
| 93 | Jordan StaalFCAR | CAR | 54.4% | 946 | 2.82 | 2.36 | 20%▲13 |
| 94 | Jake GuentzelFTBL | TBL | 54.4% | 1,212 | 3.09 | 2.59 | 100% |
| 95 | Darnell NurseDEDM | EDM | 54.4% | 1,429 | 2.77 | 2.32 | 70%▼12 |
| 96 | John MarinoDUTA | UTA | 54.4% | 624 | 2.91 | 2.44 | 18%▲13 |
| 97 | Matthew KniesFTOR | TOR | 54.4% | 1,088 | 2.89 | 2.43 | 94%▲14 |
| 98 | Jaccob SlavinDCAR | CAR | 54.3% | 1,400 | 2.84 | 2.39 | 15%▲3.8 |
| 99 | Josh MorrisseyDWPG | WPG | 54.3% | 1,567 | 2.68 | 2.26 | 99%▲3.3 |
| 100 | Miro HeiskanenDDAL | DAL | 54.3% | 972 | 3.00 | 2.52 | 100%▲4.5 |
Minimum sample: 492 min (it scales with games played and sequence coverage). 325 below the minimum are hidden.
How to read it
50% is break-even. 55% means the skater's team took 55% of the expected goals while he was on the ice.
How reliable is it?
On-ice xGF% is moderately repeatable: split-half r ≈ 0.29 at about 7 xG per half. Treat gaps of 2-3 points between players as noise before about 500 minutes.
How our expected goals model works →Related leaderboards
- 5v5 CF%50% is even. Above 55% over a full season is top-line territory; below 45% usually means heavy defensive usage or a struggling line.
- Sequence xGRead it like xGF%: 50% is even. Compare it with the plain xGF% column to see whose numbers are inflated by flurries.
- HDCF/60League average at 5-on-5 is roughly 10-12 HDCF/60 per team; the leaders sit well above that.
- Line xGF%Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while the trio was on the ice together. 50% is even.