Teams
Team Forecheck xG per 60
2023-245-on-5Through 82 team games
A forecheck is only as good as what it turns into. We count every offensive-zone hit, takeaway and forced defensive-zone giveaway, then add up the expected goals of the attempts that follow within ten seconds.
Hits make up more than half of these pressure events, and hit recording varied a lot by arena before 2024-25, so older seasons carry a scorer-bias caveat.
Leading in 2023-24: Nashville Predators, 0.392 FC xG/60.
- Legacy recording: before 2024-25 turnovers and hits were recorded arena by arena with large scorer bias. Compare players within this season only.
Forecheck xG/60 leaderboard
| # | Team | FC xG/60 | GP | Pressure events/60 | FC xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashville Predators | 0.392 | 82 | 22.3 | 30.6 |
| 2 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 0.375 | 82 | 22.3 | 30.0 |
| 3 | Florida Panthers | 0.373 | 82 | 24.2 | 28.4 |
| 4 | Edmonton Oilers | 0.358 | 82 | 21.0 | 28.6 |
| 5 | Montreal Canadiens | 0.311 | 82 | 21.2 | 24.4 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 0.309 | 82 | 16.7 | 24.4 |
| 7 | Ottawa Senators | 0.306 | 82 | 22.0 | 24.0 |
| 8 | Carolina Hurricanes | 0.305 | 82 | 18.6 | 24.2 |
| 9 | Philadelphia Flyers | 0.294 | 82 | 21.0 | 23.1 |
| 10 | New York Islanders | 0.291 | 82 | 19.7 | 23.7 |
| 11 | Vegas Golden Knights | 0.290 | 82 | 19.6 | 23.3 |
| 12 | Boston Bruins | 0.282 | 82 | 20.2 | 22.2 |
| 13 | Washington Capitals | 0.282 | 82 | 19.1 | 22.8 |
| 14 | Winnipeg Jets | 0.276 | 82 | 16.9 | 22.2 |
| 15 | Vancouver Canucks | 0.276 | 82 | 21.4 | 21.7 |
| 16 | Calgary Flames | 0.269 | 82 | 18.7 | 21.3 |
| 17 | Arizona Coyotes | 0.262 | 82 | 15.8 | 20.7 |
| 18 | Seattle Kraken | 0.254 | 82 | 18.0 | 20.4 |
| 19 | New Jersey Devils | 0.249 | 82 | 16.2 | 19.6 |
| 20 | Minnesota Wild | 0.244 | 82 | 17.0 | 19.0 |
| 21 | Los Angeles Kings | 0.243 | 82 | 16.3 | 19.2 |
| 22 | Colorado Avalanche | 0.229 | 82 | 16.4 | 17.9 |
| 23 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 0.229 | 82 | 17.8 | 18.2 |
| 24 | Anaheim Ducks | 0.227 | 82 | 18.1 | 17.4 |
| 25 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 0.222 | 82 | 16.2 | 17.8 |
| 26 | Buffalo Sabres | 0.218 | 82 | 13.9 | 17.5 |
| 27 | San Jose Sharks | 0.216 | 82 | 15.6 | 17.4 |
| 28 | Chicago Blackhawks | 0.215 | 82 | 16.9 | 17.3 |
| 29 | New York Rangers | 0.210 | 82 | 18.9 | 16.7 |
| 30 | Dallas Stars | 0.197 | 82 | 14.5 | 15.8 |
| 31 | Detroit Red Wings | 0.197 | 82 | 15.9 | 15.5 |
| 32 | St. Louis Blues | 0.160 | 82 | 16.4 | 12.7 |
How to read it
Expected goals per 60 minutes of 5-on-5 play that came straight off the forecheck.
How reliable is it?
Team forecheck rates separate clearly (in our sample, 0.33 per game for the best team vs 0.13 for the worst); it is a team trait more than a player one.
Turnovers, pressure and zone values →Related leaderboards
- Team xGF%50% is even. Teams above 53% are usually true contenders at 5-on-5, whatever their record says.
- Turnover LedgerNet expected goals per 60 minutes. Positive means a player's zone-weighted takeaways outweigh his giveaways.
- Transition attempts/60Individual attempts per 60. The count column is the raw number of transition shots, so you can see how much the rate rests on.