Teams
Team Forecheck xG per 60
2024-255-on-5Through 82 team games
A forecheck is only as good as what it turns into. We count every offensive-zone hit, takeaway and forced defensive-zone giveaway, then add up the expected goals of the attempts that follow within ten seconds.
Hits make up more than half of these pressure events, and hit recording varied a lot by arena before 2024-25, so older seasons carry a scorer-bias caveat.
Leading in 2024-25: Boston Bruins, 0.355 FC xG/60.
Forecheck xG/60 leaderboard
| # | Team | FC xG/60 | GP | Pressure events/60 | FC xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boston Bruins | 0.355 | 82 | 25.5 | 28.4 |
| 2 | Florida Panthers | 0.337 | 82 | 29.4 | 26.7 |
| 3 | Carolina Hurricanes | 0.333 | 82 | 24.0 | 26.4 |
| 4 | Nashville Predators | 0.313 | 82 | 22.3 | 24.8 |
| 5 | Utah Mammoth | 0.311 | 82 | 20.6 | 24.8 |
| 6 | Washington Capitals | 0.303 | 82 | 19.7 | 24.3 |
| 7 | New York Rangers | 0.298 | 82 | 25.1 | 23.9 |
| 8 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 0.287 | 82 | 21.5 | 23.3 |
| 9 | Calgary Flames | 0.287 | 82 | 23.2 | 23.0 |
| 10 | Montreal Canadiens | 0.277 | 82 | 23.6 | 22.0 |
| 11 | Detroit Red Wings | 0.277 | 82 | 19.5 | 22.7 |
| 12 | Vancouver Canucks | 0.267 | 82 | 25.6 | 21.3 |
| 13 | Winnipeg Jets | 0.267 | 82 | 20.0 | 21.9 |
| 14 | San Jose Sharks | 0.263 | 78 | 22.0 | 20.9 |
| 15 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 0.262 | 82 | 23.6 | 21.0 |
| 16 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 0.259 | 82 | 22.7 | 21.3 |
| 17 | Anaheim Ducks | 0.258 | 82 | 20.3 | 20.5 |
| 18 | New York Islanders | 0.258 | 82 | 22.5 | 21.1 |
| 19 | Minnesota Wild | 0.256 | 82 | 22.2 | 21.0 |
| 20 | New Jersey Devils | 0.256 | 82 | 22.7 | 20.7 |
| 21 | Dallas Stars | 0.253 | 82 | 16.6 | 20.1 |
| 22 | Colorado Avalanche | 0.253 | 80 | 20.8 | 20.3 |
| 23 | Edmonton Oilers | 0.252 | 82 | 18.5 | 20.6 |
| 24 | Philadelphia Flyers | 0.251 | 82 | 21.8 | 20.5 |
| 25 | Buffalo Sabres | 0.241 | 82 | 19.5 | 19.0 |
| 26 | St. Louis Blues | 0.238 | 82 | 23.3 | 19.7 |
| 27 | Ottawa Senators | 0.237 | 82 | 26.1 | 18.5 |
| 28 | Seattle Kraken | 0.234 | 82 | 19.9 | 18.9 |
| 29 | Chicago Blackhawks | 0.231 | 82 | 17.4 | 19.1 |
| 30 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 0.228 | 82 | 19.0 | 18.5 |
| 31 | Los Angeles Kings | 0.218 | 82 | 19.9 | 17.6 |
| 32 | Vegas Golden Knights | 0.216 | 82 | 18.9 | 18.3 |
How to read it
Expected goals per 60 minutes of 5-on-5 play that came straight off the forecheck.
How reliable is it?
Team forecheck rates separate clearly (in our sample, 0.33 per game for the best team vs 0.13 for the worst); it is a team trait more than a player one.
Turnovers, pressure and zone values →Related leaderboards
- Team xGF%50% is even. Teams above 53% are usually true contenders at 5-on-5, whatever their record says.
- Turnover LedgerNet expected goals per 60 minutes. Positive means a player's zone-weighted takeaways outweigh his giveaways.
- Transition attempts/60Individual attempts per 60. The count column is the raw number of transition shots, so you can see how much the rate rests on.