14.9 PPR pts
Floor 6 · median 13.8 · ceiling 25
- Plays
- 98%
- Implied total
- 21.3 (dog by 3)
- Matchup
- Neutral · 14th
- Usage
- –
Too close to call: 14.7 vs 14.8 projected PPR points.
Medium2026 season · Week 5 · QB
Toss-up between Love and Jackson in PPR. Too close to call: 14.7 vs 14.8 projected PPR points.
14.9 PPR pts
Floor 6 · median 13.8 · ceiling 25
Too close to call: 14.7 vs 14.8 projected PPR points.
Medium15.1 PPR pts
Floor 7 · median 14.2 · ceiling 25
Too close to call: 14.8 vs 14.7 projected PPR points.
MediumAdd more players in Who Should I StartJordan Love stats and usageLamar Jackson stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Toss-up between Love and Jackson in PPR. Too close to call: 14.7 vs 14.8 projected PPR points.
Lamar Jackson: his 90th-percentile outcome is 25 PPR points against 25 for Jordan Love, from 2,000 simulated games each.
Lamar Jackson: a floor (10th percentile) of 7 PPR points vs 6, and a 98% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Love 15.0, Jackson 15.1; half-PPR: Love 15.0, Jackson 15.1; standard: Love 15.0, Jackson 15.1 (points if he plays).