2026 season · Week 5 · WR
Toss-up between Odunze and Tucker in PPR. Too close to call: 10.9 vs 10.9 projected PPR points; Odunze's target share has risen 3 straight weeks (12% → 23%); a 24.3 implied team total vs 21.0.
Rome OdunzeCHIWR@ GB11.1 PPR pts
Floor 3 · median 9.8 · ceiling 21
Too close to call: 10.9 vs 10.9 projected PPR points; Odunze's target share has risen 3 straight weeks (12% → 23%); a 24.3 implied team total vs 21.0.
Medium
Tre TuckerLVWR@ NE11.2 PPR pts
Floor 3 · median 10.1 · ceiling 21
Too close to call: 10.9 vs 10.9 projected PPR points; Odunze's target share has risen 3 straight weeks (12% → 23%); a 21.0 implied team total vs 24.3.
MediumAdd more players in Who Should I StartRome Odunze stats and usageTre Tucker stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Toss-up between Odunze and Tucker in PPR. Too close to call: 10.9 vs 10.9 projected PPR points; Odunze's target share has risen 3 straight weeks (12% → 23%); a 24.3 implied team total vs 21.0.
Rome Odunze: his 90th-percentile outcome is 21 PPR points against 21 for Tre Tucker, from 2,000 simulated games each.
Tre Tucker: a floor (10th percentile) of 3 PPR points vs 3, and a 98% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Odunze 11.1, Tucker 11.2; half-PPR: Odunze 9.2, Tucker 9.1; standard: Odunze 7.4, Tucker 7.1 (points if he plays).
