Edgehalla

Matchup edge · RB C · WR myth · TE C

Red-zone defense: every call

Defenses that give up more points per red-zone snap boost players with big red-zone roles.

2024 backtest

–

no graded calls

2025 backtest

57–47–5

54.8% vs 50.9% baseline

Win rate 54.8% (95% 45.2%–64.0%) vs baseline 50.9%

2026 live (from Week 5)

–

first live calls this week

2026 weeks 1–4 (after the fact)

1–0

100.0% vs 38.2% baseline

Win rate 100.0% (95% 20.6%–100.0%) vs baseline 38.2%

2024–25 by position and by expected effect

PositionW–L–PWin %Baseline
WR13–14–148.1%50.5%
RB38–24–461.3%50.8%
TE6–940.0%52.2%
Expected effect (PPR)W–L–PWin %Baseline
0.25–0.553–43–555.2%50.7%
0.5–14–450.0%53.4%

Call log

Red-zone defense calls, newest first
WeekPlayerCallProjActualMarginResultSource · made
2026 W4Jonathan TaylorRB INDBoost (Red-zone defense vs WAS, expected +0.3)21.322.7+1.4✅Backtest (after the fact) ·

How this works

Win: a boost beats our projection mean, or a fade falls below it. Push: within 0.5 points. Void: did not play, or played under 25% of his usual snaps. Backtest calls use only data from before their week (the made time is 90 minutes before his kickoff); live calls are written before kickoff and cannot be edited afterwards. We list every loss. All angles and the method.

Charting data: FTN Data via nflverse, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0; our derived charting figures are shared under the same licence. Coverage allowed by defender: Pro Football Reference via nflverse. Coverage type (man/zone, shells): nflverse participation data. Play-by-play: nflverse.

Sources: nflverse, FTN Data via nflverse