2026 season · Week 5 · RB
Toss-up between Skattebo and Judkins in PPR. Too close to call: 11.0 vs 11.2 projected PPR points; NYJ allows the most RB points. In standard scoring the call flips to Skattebo.
Cam SkatteboNYGRB@ WAS11.2 PPR pts
Floor 4 · median 10.1 · ceiling 21
Too close to call: 11.0 vs 11.2 projected PPR points; NYJ allows the most RB points.
Medium
Quinshon JudkinsCLERB@ NYJ11.4 PPR pts
Floor 4 · median 10.2 · ceiling 21
Too close to call: 11.2 vs 11.0 projected PPR points; NYJ allows the most RB points.
MediumAdd more players in Who Should I StartCam Skattebo stats and usageQuinshon Judkins stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Toss-up between Skattebo and Judkins in PPR. Too close to call: 11.0 vs 11.2 projected PPR points; NYJ allows the most RB points. In standard scoring the call flips to Skattebo.
Quinshon Judkins: his 90th-percentile outcome is 21 PPR points against 21 for Cam Skattebo, from 2,000 simulated games each.
Quinshon Judkins: a floor (10th percentile) of 4 PPR points vs 4, and a 98% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Skattebo 11.2, Judkins 11.5; half-PPR: Skattebo 10.2, Judkins 10.2; standard: Skattebo 9.3, Judkins 9.0 (points if he plays).
