20.4 PPR pts
Floor 8 · median 18.8 · ceiling 35
- Plays
- 98%
- Implied total
- 28.5 (fav by 9.5)
- Matchup
- Tough · 3rd
- Target share
- 49%▲24
Projects 20.4 vs 20.1 PPR points; 9.7 projected targets.
Medium2026 season · Week 5 · WR
Start Lamb over Nacua in PPR. Projects 20.4 vs 20.1 PPR points; 9.7 projected targets. In half-PPR scoring it is a toss-up. In standard scoring it is a toss-up.
20.4 PPR pts
Floor 8 · median 18.8 · ceiling 35
Projects 20.4 vs 20.1 PPR points; 9.7 projected targets.
Medium20.1 PPR pts
Floor 7 · median 18.3 · ceiling 35
Projects 20.1 vs 20.4 PPR points.
LowAdd more players in Who Should I StartCeeDee Lamb stats and usagePuka Nacua stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Start Lamb over Nacua in PPR. Projects 20.4 vs 20.1 PPR points; 9.7 projected targets. In half-PPR scoring it is a toss-up. In standard scoring it is a toss-up.
CeeDee Lamb: his 90th-percentile outcome is 35 PPR points against 35 for Puka Nacua, from 2,000 simulated games each.
CeeDee Lamb: a floor (10th percentile) of 8 PPR points vs 7, and a 98% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Lamb 20.4, Nacua 20.1; half-PPR: Lamb 16.8, Nacua 16.6; standard: Lamb 13.3, Nacua 13.1 (points if he plays).