2026 season · Week 5 · RB
Toss-up between Brown and Warren in PPR. Too close to call: 18.5 vs 18.7 projected PPR points; Warren's snap share has risen 3 straight weeks (37% → 97%); MIA allows the 3rd-most RB points. In half-PPR scoring the call flips to Warren. In standard scoring the call flips to Warren.
Chase BrownCINRB@ MIA18.9 PPR pts
Floor 8 · median 17.4 · ceiling 32
Too close to call: 18.5 vs 18.7 projected PPR points; Warren's snap share has risen 3 straight weeks (37% → 97%); MIA allows the 3rd-most RB points.
Medium
Jaylen WarrenPITRBvs IND19.1 PPR pts
Floor 7 · median 17.4 · ceiling 33
Too close to call: 18.7 vs 18.5 projected PPR points; Warren's snap share has risen 3 straight weeks (37% → 97%); MIA allows the 3rd-most RB points.
MediumAdd more players in Who Should I StartChase Brown stats and usageJaylen Warren stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Toss-up between Brown and Warren in PPR. Too close to call: 18.5 vs 18.7 projected PPR points; Warren's snap share has risen 3 straight weeks (37% → 97%); MIA allows the 3rd-most RB points. In half-PPR scoring the call flips to Warren. In standard scoring the call flips to Warren.
Jaylen Warren: his 90th-percentile outcome is 33 PPR points against 32 for Chase Brown, from 2,000 simulated games each.
Chase Brown: a floor (10th percentile) of 8 PPR points vs 7, and a 98% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Brown 18.9, Warren 19.1; half-PPR: Brown 17.1, Warren 17.7; standard: Brown 15.3, Warren 16.4 (points if he plays).
