11.9 PPR pts
Floor 4 · median 10.8 · ceiling 22
- Plays
- 98%
- Implied total
- 22.5 (fav by 6.5)
- Matchup
- Neutral · 24th
- Snap share
- 56%▲1
Too close to call: 11.6 vs 11.6 projected PPR points.
Medium2026 season · Week 5 · RB
Toss-up between Montgomery and Harvey in PPR. Too close to call: 11.6 vs 11.6 projected PPR points. In half-PPR scoring the call flips to Montgomery. In standard scoring the call flips to Montgomery.
11.9 PPR pts
Floor 4 · median 10.8 · ceiling 22
Too close to call: 11.6 vs 11.6 projected PPR points.
Medium13.4 PPR pts
Floor 4 · median 12.1 · ceiling 24
Too close to call: 11.6 vs 11.6 projected PPR points.
LowAdd more players in Who Should I StartDavid Montgomery stats and usageRJ Harvey stats and usageAll Week 5 projections
Both players come from the same weekly projection: a mean and an 80% range from 2,000 simulated games, scored in your format, and the chance he plays. Start goes to the higher expected points (chance to play × projection); within 10% is a Flex-level close call. The tier ranks each player against everyone at his position this week. Reasons are templates filled with the model's numbers.
Updated Tue, Oct 6, 2:39 PM ETFull methodology
Toss-up between Montgomery and Harvey in PPR. Too close to call: 11.6 vs 11.6 projected PPR points. In half-PPR scoring the call flips to Montgomery. In standard scoring the call flips to Montgomery.
RJ Harvey: his 90th-percentile outcome is 24 PPR points against 22 for David Montgomery, from 2,000 simulated games each.
RJ Harvey: a floor (10th percentile) of 4 PPR points vs 4, and a 87% chance to play vs 98%.
PPR: Montgomery 11.9, Harvey 13.4; half-PPR: Montgomery 11.2, Harvey 11.6; standard: Montgomery 10.6, Harvey 9.9 (points if he plays).