Edgehalla

Matchup edge · QB myth · RB myth · WR myth · TE myth

Man coverage: every call

Receivers who beat man coverage (and QBs who scramble against it) gain against man-heavy defenses; zone-beaters gain against zone-heavy ones.

2024 backtest

20–30–3

40.0% vs 49.0% baseline

Win rate 40.0% (95% 27.6%–53.8%) vs baseline 49.0%

2025 backtest

28–32–7

46.7% vs 49.7% baseline

Win rate 46.7% (95% 34.6%–59.1%) vs baseline 49.7%

2026 live (from Week 5)

–

first live calls this week

2026 weeks 1–4 (after the fact)

5–5–2

50.0% vs 49.8% baseline

Win rate 50.0% (95% 23.7%–76.3%) vs baseline 49.8%

2024–25 by position and by expected effect

PositionW–L–PWin %Baseline
QB44–49–847.3%50.1%
RB3–730.0%40.5%
TE1–2–133.3%39.1%
WR0–4–10.0%63.7%
Expected effect (PPR)W–L–PWin %Baseline
0.25–0.546–61–1043.0%49.4%
0.5–12–166.7%50.4%

Call log

No calls match. (The call log fills once the track-record table is loaded.)

How this works

Win: a boost beats our projection mean, or a fade falls below it. Push: within 0.5 points. Void: did not play, or played under 25% of his usual snaps. Backtest calls use only data from before their week (the made time is 90 minutes before his kickoff); live calls are written before kickoff and cannot be edited afterwards. We list every loss. All angles and the method.

Charting data: FTN Data via nflverse, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0; our derived charting figures are shared under the same licence. Coverage allowed by defender: Pro Football Reference via nflverse. Coverage type (man/zone, shells): nflverse participation data. Play-by-play: nflverse.

Sources: nflverse, FTN Data via nflverse