Counting stats
NHL Power-Play Points Leaders: Arizona Coyotes
2025-26All situationsThrough 83 team games
Showing 2025-26 · 2026-27 becomes the default after ~10 games per team2026-27 so far →
This board ranks every NHL skater by total power-play points this season, regular season only.
Power-play points are goals and assists scored with the man advantage. They belong almost entirely to first-unit (PP1) players, so the board doubles as a map of who runs each power play. PPP is a category in many leagues, and PP1 time is the best single predictor of it. A player who loses his PP1 spot usually drops off this board within weeks.
Leader for the Arizona Coyotes in 2025-26: Clayton Keller (UTA), 27 PPP.
Power-Play Points leaderboard
| # | Player | Team | PPP | GP | Per game | G | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clayton KellerFUTA | UTA | 27 | 82 | 0.33 | 26 | 62 | 100%▲2.2 |
| 2 | Mikhail SergachevDUTA | UTA | 26 | 78 | 0.33 | 10 | 49 | 98%▲5.2 |
| 3 | Dylan GuentherFUTA | UTA | 24 | 79 | 0.30 | 40 | 33 | 99%▲1.8 |
| 4 | Nick SchmaltzFUTA | UTA | 20 | 82 | 0.24 | 33 | 41 | 95%▲5.2 |
| 5 | Logan CooleyFUTA | UTA | 10 | 54 | 0.19 | 24 | 19 | 94%▲9.7 |
| 6 | MacKenzie WeegarDUTA | UTA | 6 | 79 | 0.08 | 4 | 24 | 92%▼7.4 |
| 7 | Barrett HaytonFUTA | UTA | 6 | 67 | 0.09 | 10 | 15 | 10%▲10 |
| 8 | JJ PeterkaFUTA | UTA | 5 | 82 | 0.06 | 25 | 22 | 78%▲39 |
| 9 | Michael CarconeFUTA | UTA | 4 | 79 | 0.05 | 16 | 15 | 6.6%▲5.7 |
| 10 | Sean DurziDUTA | UTA | 4 | 60 | 0.07 | 5 | 22 | 40%▲38 |
| 11 | Daniil ButFUTA | UTA | 3 | 29 | 0.10 | 3 | 4 | 21%▲21 |
| 12 | Lawson CrouseFUTA | UTA | 1 | 81 | 0.01 | 24 | 20 | 36%▲12 |
| 13 | Ian ColeDUTA | UTA | 0 | 82 | 0.00 | 3 | 20 | 4.9%▲4.3 |
| 14 | Nate SchmidtDUTA | UTA | 0 | 82 | 0.00 | 5 | 17 | 4.9%▲4.6 |
| 15 | John MarinoDUTA | UTA | 0 | 80 | 0.00 | 4 | 32 | 18%▲13 |
| 16 | Kevin StenlundFUTA | UTA | 0 | 80 | 0.00 | 4 | 14 | 0.1% |
| 17 | Jack McBainFUTA | UTA | 0 | 75 | 0.00 | 9 | 16 | 17%▲15 |
| 18 | Kailer YamamotoFUTA | UTA | 0 | 59 | 0.00 | 13 | 10 | 0.2% |
| 19 | Brandon TanevFUTA | UTA | 0 | 56 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 0.1% |
| 20 | Nick DeSimoneDUTA | UTA | 0 | 40 | 0.00 | 2 | 6 | 0.1% |
| 21 | Liam O'BrienFUTA | UTA | 0 | 38 | 0.00 | 3 | 1 | 0.1% |
| 22 | Alexander KerfootFUTA | UTA | 0 | 34 | 0.00 | 7 | 6 | 3.2%▲3.2 |
| 23 | Dmitri SimashevDUTA | UTA | 0 | 28 | 0.00 | 0 | 1 | 21%▲21 |
| 24 | Maveric LamoureuxDUTA | UTA | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | 0 | 1 | 13%▲13 |
| 25 | Andrew AgozzinoFUTA | UTA | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 26 | Kevin RooneyFUTA | UTA | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
How to read it
Total power-play points this season, all situations.
How reliable is it?
Totals reward games played and ice time as much as skill; see the per-60 version for the rate view.
About our data sources →Projected next
Our fantasy projections for power-play points: who should lead the coming games.
Related leaderboards
- Power-Play Points: forwardsTotal power-play points this season, all situations.
- Power-Play Points: defenseTotal power-play points this season, all situations.
- Power-Play Points: last 10Total power-play points over the player's last 10 games.
- Power-Play Points per 60Power-Play Points per 60 minutes of ice time, all situations.