LW · UTA · NHL id 8479293
Brandon Tanev has played 56 games for the Utah Mammoth in 2025-26, scoring 0 goals and 3 assists (3 points) on 42 shots while averaging 9:22 a night (9:05 at even strength, 0:01 on the power play and 0:09 shorthanded). At 5v5 he has skated 83% of his 5v5 minutes with Kevin Stenlund and 55% with Liam O'Brien over the last 10 games, and the Mammoth have controlled 48% of shot attempts with Tanev on the ice (8-23 in goals, 47% offensive-zone starts). In the Mammoth's most recent game against VGK he was on L4 with Kevin Stenlund and Jack McBain and off the power play. He is shooting 0.0% this season against 11.0% across the 615 games in our data.
Right now
From the May 1 game vs VGK, detected from shift data
Deployment timeline
2025-26 · per-game ice time by strength, with line and power-play unit changes
Usage: 16 games, 8:56 average time on ice, PP1 in 0 games, 2 line changes.
- Even strength
- Power play
- Penalty kill
- 5-game average
- Did not play
- ▲ promoted · ▼ demoted
NHL EDGE tracking
2025-26 percentiles among skaters at his position
Season-level NHL EDGE puck and player tracking, refreshed nightly. The percentile is the league rank among skaters this season; the label at the right is the raw value.
Shot map
2025-26 · 97 attempts, 47 on goal, 0 goals
Shot map, OPP at UTA: 97 attempts, 47 on goal, 0 goals, 4.63 expected goals; best chance Brandon Tanev at 0.33 xG.
- Even strength
- Power play
- Penalty kill
- Goal
- Shot on goal
- Missed
- Blocked
Luck
2025-26 · 56 GP · 3 points vs 9.6 expected
Last 20 games: -67. Positive means running hot (sell), negative running cold (buy).
- 0.0%
- 93.4
- 33.3%
- G vs xG
- 0 / 3.4
- • Role rose over the last 10 games (3 promotion events): some of the heat may be real.
- • Shot diet improved: 0.081 xG per attempt lately vs 0.050 before (more from the slot).
- Actual goals
- Expected
- ±1σ
- Above expected
- Below expected
Player analytics
Compare with another player →2025-26 regular season. Rank is among all qualified players; the bar is his percentile among forwards. Each stat links to its explainer.
Fantasy box score
- Games played56
- Goals0685th of 715
- Assists3651st of 715
- Points3686th of 715
- Power-play points0437th of 715
- Shorthanded points0227th of 715
- Shots on goal42582nd of 715
- Hits15564th of 715
- Blocked shots34398th of 715
- Plus/minus−15631st of 715
- Penalty minutes50104th of 715
- Faceoffs won3392nd of 715
Possession & shot quality (5-on-5 on-ice)
- Corsi (CF%)47.8%474th of 719
- Fenwick (FF%)48.6%421st of 719
- Expected goals (xGF%)45.0%583rd of 719
- Sequence xG (sxGF%)44.6%597th of 719
- High-danger chances (HDCF%)46.0%550th of 719
- Scoring chances (SCF%)47.0%519th of 719
Transition, turnovers & faceoffs
- Transition attempts /601.18219th of 719
- Turnover Ledger /60+0.04418th of 719
- Forecheck xG /60 (on-ice)0.557th of 719
- Faceoff win %21.4%
- Draw Equity /100−0.331
Usage
- Ice time per game9:22691st of 715
- Power-play time per game0:01673rd of 715
- Offensive-zone start %47.1%448th of 719
Special teams & discipline
- Net penalties drawn /600.00267th of 719
Luck & trend
- On-ice PDO934712th of 719
- Goals above expected−3.9655th of 715
- Luck Meter−87828th of 828
NHL EDGE tracking
- Top skating speed23.0128th of 715
- 20+ mph bursts98199th of 715
- Hardest shot86.7434th of 715
- Offensive-zone time39.9%552nd of 715
Unranked rows are below the sample minimum (20 GP, 200 five-on-five minutes, 100 draws or 10 goalie games).
Beyond the box score
2025-26 regular season · 52 of 56 games through the sequence engine (more fill in as games are reprocessed)
- −0.066
- Season net
- −0.56xG
5-on-5. Each takeaway is credited, and each giveaway charged, at the league xG value of the zone.
- Per 60
- 1.18
- Attempts
- 10
- 0.015
5-on-5 shots within 10 seconds of winning the puck outside the offensive zone.
Role changes
Notable promotions, demotions and ice-time swings from Line Watch
- Moved up to PP1Dec 30, 2019 alerts →
- Played 7:17 more than his 5-game averageApr 29, 2018 alerts →
How the goals happened
17 goals since 2023-24 with NHL EDGE tracking: press Replay to watch the tracking animation
| Game | Play | Entry | Passes | Shot mph | Notes | Replay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2025 @ EDM | Cycle | — | 4* | 3.3 | — | |
| Feb 2, 2025 vs CGY | Deflection | — | 0 | 15.8 | — | |
| Jan 11, 2025 @ BUF | Point shot | — | 2 | 53.2 | — | |
| Dec 8, 2024 @ NYR | Cycle | — | 0 | 9.7 | — | |
| Dec 3, 2024 @ CAR | Rebound | loose | 0 | 17.1 | rebound | |
| Nov 14, 2024 vs CHI | Dump and chase | dump | 0 | 51.4 | — | |
| Nov 12, 2024 vs CBJ | Odd-man rush | carry | 0 | 43.3 | 2-on-1 | |
| Nov 8, 2024 vs VGK | Off the faceoff | — | 1 | 42.0 | — | |
| Nov 8, 2024 vs VGK | Odd-man rush | carry | 0 | 29.0 | 1-on-0 | |
| Oct 15, 2024 @ NSH | Deflection | — | 3 | 42.1 | deflection | |
| Apr 9, 2024 vs ARI | Forecheck turnover | — | 0 | 43.9 | one-timer | |
| Mar 12, 2024 vs VGK | Deflection | carry | 5* | 60.3 | 3-on-2, deflection | |
| Jan 28, 2024 vs CBJ | Odd-man rush | loose | 0 | 12.2 | 6-on-1 | |
| Jan 24, 2024 vs CHI | Forecheck turnover | — | 2* | 28.9 | one-timer | |
| Dec 20, 2023 @ LAK | Rebound | — | 0 | 9.4 | rebound | |
| Nov 22, 2023 vs SJS | Odd-man rush | loose | 1 | 25.4 | 1-on-0 | |
| Nov 13, 2023 vs COL | Rebound | — | 0 | 25.6 | rebound |
* includes a royal-road (cross-slot) pass. Derived from NHL EDGE puck and player tracking.
Linemates
2025-26 · 5v5 time together and how each pairing performs with and without Tanev
| Teammate | Pos | GP | Share | CF% together | GF% together | CF% Tanev apart | CF% mate apart | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Stenlund | C | 60 | 457:02 | 82% | 46.7% | 19% (5-21) | 47.8% 85:47 | 39.5% 193:07 |
| Ian Cole | D | 62 | 215:32 | 38% | 43.0% | 7% (1-13) | 48.9% 344:43 | 49.8% 699:50 |
| Liam O'Brien | C | 28 | 206:38 | 37% | 47.3% | 25% (2-6) | 40.3% 46:01 | 24.7% 48:24 |
| John Marino | D | 58 | 190:30 | 34% | 52.9% | 50% (7-7) | 41.0% 338:38 | 54.9% 835:58 |
| Nate Schmidt | D | 61 | 185:12 | 33% | 51.7% | 42% (5-7) | 43.4% 369:20 | 55.4% 832:58 |
| Mikhail Sergachev | D | 60 | 150:32 | 27% | 43.9% | 17% (1-5) | 47.2% 392:44 | 53.2% 886:34 |
| Kailer Yamamoto | RW | 22 | 127:38 | 23% | 45.5% | 22% (2-7) | 49.0% 81:20 | 57.1% 114:27 |
| Sean Durzi | D | 37 | 107:33 | 19% | 47.1% | 0% (0-6) | 44.8% 214:57 | 54.5% 512:30 |
| Nick DeSimone | D | 27 | 86:16 | 15% | 43.4% | 0% (0-3) | 51.8% 153:06 | 55.2% 294:43 |
| Dmitri Simashev | D | 25 | 68:05 | 12% | 39.5% | 33% (1-2) | 48.8% 175:41 | 48.0% 305:38 |
| Alexander Kerfoot | C | 10 | 54:49 | 10% | 43.5% | 29% (2-5) | 39.7% 35:44 | 48.9% 53:01 |
| Olli Maatta | D | 15 | 53:27 | 10% | 35.8% | 0% (0-3) | 46.6% 94:01 | 54.0% 133:05 |
| MacKenzie Weegar | D | 15 | 45:05 | 8% | 43.5% | 25% (1-3) | 45.2% 87:15 | 54.9% 218:38 |
| Michael Carcone | LW | 9 | 41:38 | 7% | 49.4% | 67% (2-1) | 43.2% 45:07 | 60.0% 66:17 |
Linemate and opposition quality
2025-26 · 5v5 · 509 min on ice · ranked against 510 forwards
60th percentile · higher = stronger linemates
31st percentile · higher = tougher opponents
Sheltered minutes: mostly faces weaker opposition.
Each value is the ice-time-weighted average season xGF% of the skaters Tanev shared the 5v5 ice with. Small samples lean on each skater's previous season (or 50% for newcomers). Most skaters land between about 45% and 55% for QoT and 49% and 51% for QoC, so the percentile is the easier read.
Game log
62 games in 2025-26, newest first
| Date | Opp | Result | G | A | P | +/- | PIM | HIT | BLK | EV | PP | PK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1PO | vs VGK | L 1-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | — | 9:24 | 9:24 | — | — |
| Apr 29PO | @ VGK | OTL 4-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | 10:22 | 10:22 | — | — |
| Apr 27PO | vs VGK | OTL 4-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | 11:35 | 11:29 | 0:06 | — |
| Apr 24PO | vs VGK | W 4-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | 6:09 | 6:09 | — | — |
| Apr 21PO | @ VGK | W 3-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | — | 6:21 | 5:54 | — | 0:27 |
| Apr 19PO | @ VGK | L 2-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | — | 8:03 | 8:03 | — | — |
| Apr 16 | vs STL | L 3-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | 11:52 | 11:41 | — | 0:11 |
| Apr 14 | vs WPG | W 5-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 9:12 | 8:38 | — | — |
| Apr 12 | @ CGY | L 1-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | 9:07 | 8:53 | — | — |
| Apr 11 | vs CAR | L 1-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | 8:26 | 8:26 | — | — |
| Apr 9 | vs NSH | W 4-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | — | 9:51 | 9:33 | — | — |
| Apr 7 | vs EDM | W 6-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 7:09 | 7:09 | — | — |
| Apr 4 | @ VAN | W 7-4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | — | 10:32 | 10:32 | — | — |
| Apr 2 | @ SEA | W 6-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 9:44 | 9:39 | — | — |
| Mar 28 | @ LAK | W 6-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | — | 10:55 | 10:43 | — | — |
| Mar 26 | vs WSH | L 4-7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 0 | — | 6:32 | 5:43 | — | — |
| Mar 16 | @ DAL | W 6-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | — | 7:45 | 7:43 | 0:02 | — |
| Feb 25 | vs COL | L 2-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | 8:49 | 8:49 | — | — |
| Feb 4 | vs DET | W 4-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | — | 7:13 | 7:13 | — | — |
| Feb 2 | vs VAN | W 6-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 8:48 | 8:48 | — | — |
Season splits by strength
2025-26 regular season · on-ice numbers from shift and play-by-play data
| Strength | GP | TOI/GP | SA | GF | GA | GF% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All situations | 56 | 524:04 | 9:22 | 435 | 486 | 47.2% | 48.0% | 185 | 218 | 9 | 25 | 26% | 17.4 | 21.7 | 47% |
| Even strength | 56 | 508:54 | 9:05 | 425 | 464 | 47.8% | 48.6% | 181 | 208 | 8 | 23 | 26% | 16.5 | 20.2 | 47% |
| 5v5 | 56 | 508:54 | 9:05 | 425 | 464 | 47.8% | 48.6% | 181 | 208 | 8 | 23 | 26% | 16.5 | 20.2 | 47% |
| Power play | 8 | 0:43 | 0:05 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100% |
| Penalty kill | 13 | 8:49 | 0:41 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 18.2% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0% |
| 4v5 | 13 | 8:49 | 0:41 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 18.2% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0% |
| 5v6, opponent net empty | 11 | 4:06 | 0:22 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 12.5% | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 0.4 | 0.6 | — |
Career by season
Seasons in Edgehalla's data (2025-26 is being backfilled; earlier seasons follow)
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | P | +/- | PIM | HIT | BLK | TOI/GP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26Playoffs | UTA | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 4 | 5 | 0.0% | 25 | 2 | 8:39 |
| 2025-26 | UTA | 56 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -15 | 50 | 42 | 0.0% | 155 | 34 | 9:22 |
| 2024-25Playoffs | WPG | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 18 | 9 | 0.0% | 44 | 18 | 10:57 |
| 2024-25 | WPG, SEA | 79 | 10 | 12 | 22 | -12 | 16 | 99 | 10.1% | 168 | 105 | 13:14 |
| 2023-24 | SEA | 66 | 7 | 9 | 16 | +2 | 51 | 73 | 9.6% | 148 | 62 | 14:35 |
| 2022-23Playoffs | SEA | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 7.7% | 51 | 17 | 13:24 |
| 2022-23 | SEA | 82 | 16 | 19 | 35 | +21 | 44 | 115 | 13.9% | 190 | 68 | 14:13 |
| 2021-22 | SEA | 30 | 9 | 6 | 15 | +4 | 13 | 51 | 17.6% | 98 | 22 | 14:34 |
| 2020-21Playoffs | PIT | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 13 | 7.7% | 39 | 1 | 13:15 |
| 2020-21 | PIT | 32 | 7 | 9 | 16 | +12 | 22 | 43 | 16.3% | 139 | 33 | 14:26 |
| 2019-20 | PIT | 68 | 11 | 14 | 25 | -1 | 16 | 95 | 11.6% | 244 | 65 | 14:45 |
| 2018-19Playoffs | WPG | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10.0% | 17 | 8 | 13:45 |
| 2018-19 | WPG | 80 | 14 | 15 | 29 | +9 | 41 | 127 | 11.0% | 278 | 81 | 14:07 |
| 2017-18Playoffs | WPG | 17 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 11 | 32 | 12.5% | 44 | 19 | 13:19 |
| 2017-18 | WPG | 61 | 8 | 10 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 79 | 10.1% | 188 | 56 | 12:40 |
Brandon Tanev news
- Brandon Tanev StatsNHL.com
- Brandon Tanev Bio, Awards & Draft InfoNHL.com
- Utah Mammoth 2025-26 Grades: Forward Brandon TanevKSL Sports
- Utah Mammoth's 2025-26 Report Cards: Brandon TanevThe Hockey Writers
- Utah Mammoth’s 2025-26 Report Cards: Brandon TanevThe Hockey Writers
- Brandon Tanev Siblings: Meet Kyle and Christopher TanevKahawatungu
- EXIT INTERVIEW: Brandon Tanev 5.3.26NHL.com
- Mammoth's Brandon Tanev: Contributes helper in winCBS Sports
Headlines via LineupExperts. Links open the original publisher.
On-ice and deployment numbers are derived by Edgehalla from NHL play-by-play and shift data. Tracking percentiles are from NHL EDGE. Data updates after every game.