Edgehalla

Chemistry and stacks · 2025-26

Utah Mammoth line chemistry and DFS stacks

Every Mammoth pair with 50+ minutes together at 5v5: how their expected-goal share changes together vs apart, and how closely their DraftKings points move game to game. Check tonight's Mammoth lines before you stack.

Showing the full 2025-26 season. 2026-27 pairs do not have enough games together yet; the page switches over once they do.

Best Mammoth stacks

Utah Mammoth pairs ranked by DFS stack score, 2025-26
Pair5v5 minxG% liftxGF/60 liftDK corr. (raw)Stack
Nick Schmaltz + Clayton KellerF–F · PP1025+8.3+0.66.38.21 to .53, 81 GP6.8
Dylan Guenther + Logan CooleyF–F · PP475−0.6+0.12.35.10 to .55, 43 GP6.2
Lawson Crouse + Dylan GuentherF–F111+0.2−0.06.71.29 to .90, 11 GP5.6
Lawson Crouse + Clayton KellerF–F393−0.7−0.02.37.10 to .59, 35 GP5.5
Clayton Keller + JJ PeterkaF–F · PP254+2.8+0.14.43.04 to .71, 18 GP5.4
Nick Schmaltz + Lawson CrouseF–F400−0.5+0.02.40.13 to .61, 35 GP5.3
JJ Peterka + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP306−4.3−0.13.21−.11 to .50, 28 GP5.3
Michael Carcone + Dylan GuentherF–F167+2.9+0.26.69.31 to .88, 13 GP5.2
Nick Schmaltz + JJ PeterkaF–F · PP242+1.9+0.02.36−.06 to .68, 17 GP5.2
Barrett Hayton + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP251−1.6+0.01.38.04 to .65, 23 GP5.1

Forward pairs

Utah Mammoth forward pairs by 5v5 time together, 2025-26
Pair5v5 minxG% liftxGF/60 liftDK corr. (raw)Stack
Nick Schmaltz + Clayton KellerF–F · PP1025+8.3+0.66.38.21 to .53, 81 GP6.8
Michael Carcone + Jack McBainF–F540+5.3+0.41.38.17 to .56, 55 GP3.1
Dylan Guenther + Logan CooleyF–F · PP475−0.6+0.12.35.10 to .55, 43 GP6.2
Kevin Stenlund + Brandon TanevF–F415−4.6−0.26.12−.12 to .34, 50 GP1.5
Nick Schmaltz + Lawson CrouseF–F400−0.5+0.02.40.13 to .61, 35 GP5.3
Lawson Crouse + Clayton KellerF–F393−0.7−0.02.37.10 to .59, 35 GP5.5
Lawson Crouse + Jack McBainF–F322−1.8+0.11.24−.08 to .51, 29 GP3.4
JJ Peterka + Logan CooleyF–F311−5.3−0.19.48.18 to .70, 26 GP4.9
Liam O'Brien + Kevin StenlundF–F306+4.7+0.41.15−.13 to .41, 37 GP1.7
JJ Peterka + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP306−4.3−0.13.21−.11 to .50, 28 GP5.3
Barrett Hayton + JJ PeterkaF–F283−0.1+0.03−.00−.35 to .35, 23 GP3.5
Clayton Keller + JJ PeterkaF–F · PP254+2.8+0.14.43.04 to .71, 18 GP5.4
Barrett Hayton + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP251−1.6+0.01.38.04 to .65, 23 GP5.1
Kevin Stenlund + Kailer YamamotoF–F245−1.0−0.34.23−.10 to .52, 27 GP2.3
Nick Schmaltz + JJ PeterkaF–F · PP242+1.9+0.02.36−.06 to .68, 17 GP5.2

Defence pairs

Utah Mammoth defence pairs by 5v5 time together, 2025-26
Pair5v5 minxG% liftxGF/60 liftDK corr. (raw)Stack
Nate Schmidt + John MarinoD–D989+1.5+0.16.02−.18 to .21, 74 GP0.9
Mikhail Sergachev + Sean DurziD–D493+2.4+0.07.32.05 to .55, 36 GP2.1
Ian Cole + Nick DeSimoneD–D354+0.4−0.14.23−.06 to .48, 35 GP1.0
Ian Cole + Sean DurziD–D238−0.1+0.23−.02−.42 to .38, 18 GP1.3
MacKenzie Weegar + Mikhail SergachevD–D220+2.6+0.16−.09−.49 to .35, 16 GP1.7
Mikhail Sergachev + Dmitri SimashevD–D197−3.4−0.16.14−.27 to .52, 18 GP1.4
Ian Cole + Olli MaattaD–D149+2.2+0.24.64.29 to .84, 16 GP0.9
John Marino + Mikhail SergachevD–D145−1.6−0.07.14−.53 to .71, 8 GP1.6

Forwards with defencemen

Utah Mammoth forward-defence pairs by 5v5 time together, 2025-26
Pair5v5 minxG% liftxGF/60 liftDK corr. (raw)Stack
Clayton Keller + Mikhail SergachevF–D · PP476+1.4+0.10.27.05 to .47, 55 GP2.5
Nick Schmaltz + Mikhail SergachevF–D · PP466−1.1−0.16.12−.11 to .34, 52 GP2.0
John Marino + Clayton KellerF–D455+2.4+0.19−.06−.29 to .17, 52 GP1.2
Nate Schmidt + Clayton KellerF–D450+2.5−0.01−.10−.33 to .15, 47 GP1.2
Nick Schmaltz + John MarinoF–D445+3.2+0.17.27.03 to .48, 47 GP1.7
Nate Schmidt + Nick SchmaltzF–D442+1.8−0.09−.01−.25 to .23, 48 GP1.3
Lawson Crouse + Mikhail SergachevF–D409−4.5−0.25.01−.24 to .27, 42 GP1.5
Nate Schmidt + JJ PeterkaF–D391−1.8−0.11−.12−.39 to .17, 35 GP0.9
John Marino + JJ PeterkaF–D382−1.4−0.25−.04−.33 to .26, 33 GP1.0
John Marino + Dylan GuentherF–D376+2.3+0.03.14−.17 to .43, 30 GP1.6
Nate Schmidt + Dylan GuentherF–D359+3.3+0.35.13−.20 to .43, 28 GP1.6
Mikhail Sergachev + JJ PeterkaF–D · PP358+0.3+0.10.28−.02 to .53, 33 GP1.8

Power-play partners

Pairs with 30+ minutes together on the power play, most PP time first. Power-play partners share the same goals, so they are the strongest stacks when both are on PP1 tonight.

Utah Mammoth power-play partners, 2025-26
Pair5v5 minxG% liftxGF/60 liftDK corr. (raw)Stack
Nick Schmaltz + Clayton KellerF–F · PP1025+8.3+0.66.38.21 to .53, 81 GP6.8
Clayton Keller + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP143+0.1−0.00.59−.14 to .91, 7 GP6.7
Nick Schmaltz + Dylan GuentherF–F · PP130+0.3−0.06.09−.63 to .72, 7 GP6.5
Clayton Keller + Mikhail SergachevF–D · PP476+1.4+0.10.27.05 to .47, 55 GP2.5
Nick Schmaltz + Mikhail SergachevF–D · PP466−1.1−0.16.12−.11 to .34, 52 GP2.0
Mikhail Sergachev + Dylan GuentherF–D · PP340−0.0+0.31.12−.19 to .41, 30 GP2.1
Clayton Keller + Logan CooleyF–F · PP135+3.8+0.44.34−.54 to .86, 6 GP5.9
Dylan Guenther + Logan CooleyF–F · PP475−0.6+0.12.35.10 to .55, 43 GP6.2
Nick Schmaltz + Logan CooleyF–F · PP106+2.9+0.42.73−.02 to .95, 6 GP5.9
Mikhail Sergachev + Logan CooleyF–D · PP229−1.1+0.43.52.18 to .74, 21 GP2.2

FAQ

Which Utah Mammoth players have the best chemistry?

In 2025-26, Nick Schmaltz and Clayton Keller gained the most together: +0.66 expected goals for per 60 at 5v5 compared with apart (xG share +8.3 points), after shrinking for sample size, over 1025 minutes together.

Which Utah Mammoth players should I stack in DFS?

Nick Schmaltz and Clayton Keller have the top stack score (6.8): they combine for 23.1 DraftKings points a game over 81 games together, and like most linemates their points tend to arrive together (about .29 for this kind of pair; their raw 2025-26 value was .38).

Where are tonight's Utah Mammoth lines?

Tonight's projected lines and power-play units are on the Utah Mammoth line combinations page. Chemistry here is measured over the whole season, so check that the pair is still together before you stack it.