Edgehalla

Injury cascade

Who benefits when Rieger Lorenz is out?

Rieger Lorenz (L, Minnesota Wild) plays 8:39 a night on L3, with 0% of the team's power-play time over his last 10 games. He has missed the team's last 1 game.

Only 1 game without Rieger Lorenz so far; history is blended with line-adjacency estimates. Through games of Oct 20, 2026.

Expected change per game without him

Ranked beneficiaries

Show
Players whose ice time and power-play share rose without the injured player, ranked by expected fantasy opportunity.
PlayerGamesExp. Δ TOIRost %Basis
Quinn HughesDIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Quinn Hughes played 31:18 (+5:51) and PP share went 63% → 77%.125:27 → 31:18+1:5763% → 77%1/1100%Games without him
Jonas BrodinDIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Jonas Brodin played 28:13 (+5:53).122:20 → 28:13+1:585% → 7%0/17.9%▲2.9Games without him
Daemon HuntDIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Daemon Hunt played 18:02 (+3:27).114:35 → 18:02+1:090% → 0%0/10.1%Games without him
Zach BogosianDIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Zach Bogosian played 21:16 (+3:24).117:53 → 21:16+1:083% → 1%0/10.4%Games without him
Blake ColemanCIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Blake Coleman played 17:35 (+1:01), PP share went 24% → 33% and moved up to his L3 slot in 1.116:34 → 17:35+0:2025% → 33%0/139%▼2.2Games without him
Joel Eriksson EkCIn 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Joel Eriksson Ek played 22:45 (+2:17).120:28 → 22:45+0:4653% → 50%1/181%▲3.2Games without him

FAQ

Who benefits when Rieger Lorenz is out?

Quinn Hughes projects to gain the most (+1:57 a game). In 1 game without Rieger Lorenz, Quinn Hughes played 31:18 (+5:51) and PP share went 63% → 77%.

How many games has MIN played without Rieger Lorenz?

1 game in the loaded seasons while he was on the roster, against 5 with him.

How it works

  1. We find every game the injured player missed while on the team's roster this season and last (including the current absence), and compare each teammate's ice time, power-play share and PP1 usage in those games with the games the injured player dressed.
  2. Changes are shrunk toward zero when the sample is small (a change over n games counts n / (n + 2) of its size), so one odd game does not crown a beneficiary.
  3. When there is little or no absence history, we fall back to line adjacency from our shift-based line detection: the next man up on his power-play unit (the top PP2 player at his position) and the best player one line or pair below his.
  4. Players are ranked by expected fantasy opportunity: TOI minutes, plus power-play share (10 points of PP share ≈ 1.2 minutes of even-strength TOI), plus PP1 gains.

Today's injuries and every team →