How Hockey ChangedStandings and results

The Schedule Got Kinder. The Second Night Didn’t.

In the Original Six era about a third of NHL games were a team’s second night in a row, and one goalie played both. In 2025-26 it was about one in six, and rarely the same goalie. The busiest year, 1958-59, had 29 back-to-backs per team for every 82 games; the 2026-27 schedule, the first with 84 games, has about 12. Tired teams still win about 4 fewer games in 100 against rested ones, as they have since expansion; before that, the old records are murkier.

Verdict: Data story

By Edgehalla ResearchPublished 9 min read

Post on X

One weekend in 1950, as Stan Fischler tells it, the Rangers played the Red Wings on a Saturday night in Detroit and followed with a Sunday game at Madison Square Garden. Both teams rode the 20th Century Limited east. A blizzard had hit upstate New York between Buffalo and Rochester.

“We got word late Sunday afternoon at the Garden that the train would be late,” said Tom Lockhart, the Rangers’ business manager. At 8:30, with neither team in the building, he sent amateur players from the Met League onto the ice to keep a near-sellout crowd in its seats.

Teams now fly, rest their goalie and play about half as many back-to-backs. So has the second night got easier? Since expansion, at least, it hasn’t.

Use the toolNHL goalie hubStarters, save percentage and workload for every goalie.

In the Original Six, a third of games were a second night

That train ride was ordinary. The NHL began with no back-to-backs at all: through 1924-25 no team played on consecutive nights, and games came about twice a week. By the six-team era the weekend double was the spine of the calendar. In every Original Six season, 72 to 97% of back-to-backs were a Saturday followed by a Sunday, and 15 to 44% were home-and-homes against the same opponent, with the train trip in between. By the late 1950s about a third of the league’s games were a team’s second night in a row, and the NHL has spent the six decades since undoing it.

Seasons ran 70 games in the 1950s and run 84 now, so we count back-to-backs for every 82 games a team played. The busiest year was 1958-59, with 29 per team. Toronto had the most back-to-backs in the league, or shared the lead, in at least 17 of the 25 Original Six seasons, as many as 27 in a 70-game season. Boston’s 28 back-to-backs in 70 games in 1964-65 are the most of any team for the length of its season. The most ever in one season is 30, by Pittsburgh and Detroit in 1978-79, in an 80-game schedule.

Back-to-backs peaked in the late 1950s and are less than half that now

Back-to-backs per team for every 82 games played, every regular season since 1917-18, plus the published 2026-27 schedule

Show data
Back-to-backs rose from none before 1925-26 to 29.1 per team in 1958-59, then fell to 11.2 in 2023-24 and 11.5 on the 2026-27 schedule.
SeasonSeasons played2026-27 published schedule
1917-180 per team–
1918-190 per team–
1919-200 per team–
1920-210 per team–
1921-220 per team–
1922-230 per team–
1923-240 per team–
1924-250 per team–
1925-264 per team–
1926-272 per team–
1927-284 per team–
1928-294 per team–
1929-305 per team–
1930-311 per team–
1931-323 per team–
1932-332 per team–
1933-344 per team–
1934-357 per team–
1935-367 per team–
1936-379 per team–
1937-3811 per team–
1938-3910 per team–
1939-4011 per team–
1940-4114 per team–
1941-4216 per team–
1942-4319 per team–
1943-4419 per team–
1944-4520 per team–
1945-4623 per team–
1946-4723 per team–
1947-4823 per team–
1948-4923 per team–
1949-5026 per team–
1950-5125 per team–
1951-5224 per team–
1952-5326 per team–
1953-5427 per team–
1954-5527 per team–
1955-5626 per team–
1956-5726 per team–
1957-5828 per team–
1958-5929 per team–
1959-6028 per team–
1960-6126 per team–
1961-6227 per team–
1962-6326 per team–
1963-6426 per team–
1964-6528 per team–
1965-6629 per team–
1966-6727 per team–
1967-6825 per team–
1968-6926 per team–
1969-7025 per team–
1970-7124 per team–
1971-7224 per team–
1972-7324 per team–
1973-7421 per team–
1974-7522 per team–
1975-7622 per team–
1976-7721 per team–
1977-7823 per team–
1978-7924 per team–
1979-8021 per team–
1980-8121 per team–
1981-8221 per team–
1982-8319 per team–
1983-8418 per team–
1984-8519 per team–
1985-8619 per team–
1986-8719 per team–
1987-8818 per team–
1988-8917 per team–
1989-9016 per team–
1990-9117 per team–
1991-9215 per team–
1992-9315 per team–
1993-9416 per team–
1994-9516 per team–
1995-9616 per team–
1996-9715 per team–
1997-9816 per team–
1998-9915 per team–
1999-0016 per team–
2000-0117 per team–
2001-0214 per team–
2002-0315 per team–
2003-0416 per team–
2004-05––
2005-0615 per team–
2006-0715 per team–
2007-0815 per team–
2008-0915 per team–
2009-1015 per team–
2010-1116 per team–
2011-1214 per team–
2012-1315 per team–
2013-1415 per team–
2014-1514 per team–
2015-1614 per team–
2016-1715 per team–
2017-1814 per team–
2018-1913 per team–
2019-2013 per team–
2020-2114 per team–
2021-2214 per team–
2022-2313 per team–
2023-2411 per team–
2024-2512 per team–
2025-2613 per team13 per team
2026-27–12 per team
  • 1942-43: Six teams
  • 1967-68: Expansion to 12
  • 2026-27: 84 games
A back-to-back is a game the day after a team’s previous game. Scaled by 82 ÷ the season’s average team schedule (18 games in 1917-18, 84 in 1992-93, 1993-94 and 2026-27). 1994-95 and 2012-13 (48 games), 2019-20 (stopped after 68 to 71) and 2020-21 (56, division play) are scaled the same way. The 2026-27 point is the published schedule, not games played. The 2004-05 season was cancelled.

On most of those weekends nobody had an edge, because both teams were tired. In 1950-51 there were 50 games with both teams on their second night and 28 with only one. The games this story is about, a tired team against a rested one, were rare in the old league for all its back-to-backs: only 890 in 25 seasons.

Then the league kept the rest and spread it out

The NHL didn’t cut them by adding days off. A team in 1955-56 played a game every 2.4 days and averaged 1.4 rest days between games. In 2025-26 the figures were 2.3 and 1.3. Teams got about as much rest as before. They got it in a completely different shape.

In 1955-56, 32% of the gaps between a team’s games were zero days, 27% were one day and 21% were three days or more: doubles on the weekend, long breaks in the week. In 2025-26, 62% of gaps were a single day off, 17% were zero and only 5% three or more. The NHL turned a schedule of clumps into one of every other night.

Same rest, new shape: one day off became the normal gap

Share of the gaps between a team’s games that were 0, 1, or 3+ days off, every regular season since 1917-18

Show data
Zero-day gaps fell from 32% in 1955-56 to 17% in 2025-26 while one-day gaps rose from 27% to 62%; average rest stayed near 1.3 days.
SeasonNo day off (back-to-back)One day offThree or more days off
1917-180%28%43%
1918-190%39%41%
1919-200%14%46%
1920-210%22%39%
1921-220%0%52%
1922-230%4%48%
1923-240%7%50%
1924-250%15%47%
1925-265%32%32%
1926-272%43%27%
1927-285%39%30%
1928-294%49%22%
1929-306%41%25%
1930-312%45%27%
1931-323%48%18%
1932-332%51%20%
1933-345%49%18%
1934-359%47%23%
1935-369%44%26%
1936-3711%44%27%
1937-3813%40%29%
1938-3912%40%27%
1939-4014%42%28%
1940-4118%39%29%
1941-4220%38%33%
1942-4324%34%34%
1943-4423%27%35%
1944-4525%27%30%
1945-4629%12%29%
1946-4729%9%20%
1947-4829%12%19%
1948-4929%12%21%
1949-5032%13%12%
1950-5131%21%16%
1951-5229%29%19%
1952-5332%23%20%
1953-5434%24%20%
1954-5534%24%17%
1955-5632%27%21%
1956-5732%27%21%
1957-5835%23%19%
1958-5936%19%18%
1959-6035%20%18%
1960-6133%19%17%
1961-6234%23%18%
1962-6332%22%18%
1963-6432%18%15%
1964-6535%16%17%
1965-6635%15%13%
1966-6733%16%13%
1967-6831%20%14%
1968-6932%25%13%
1969-7030%22%14%
1970-7130%28%13%
1971-7230%26%12%
1972-7329%26%11%
1973-7426%31%13%
1974-7528%33%12%
1975-7627%35%12%
1976-7726%37%11%
1977-7829%32%12%
1978-7930%34%11%
1979-8026%36%10%
1980-8126%38%10%
1981-8226%35%11%
1982-8323%40%10%
1983-8422%41%10%
1984-8523%42%11%
1985-8623%42%9%
1986-8724%43%9%
1987-8822%45%10%
1988-8920%47%9%
1989-9020%48%11%
1990-9121%48%11%
1991-9218%49%13%
1992-9319%51%12%
1993-9420%47%11%
1994-9519%55%8%
1995-9619%47%12%
1996-9719%48%12%
1997-9819%50%11%
1998-9919%48%13%
1999-0019%48%14%
2000-0121%47%11%
2001-0218%54%9%
2002-0318%55%7%
2003-0419%55%8%
2004-05–––
2005-0619%52%9%
2006-0718%51%9%
2007-0819%51%11%
2008-0919%52%9%
2009-1019%56%9%
2010-1120%51%10%
2011-1217%54%8%
2012-1319%60%4%
2013-1418%55%8%
2014-1517%54%9%
2015-1617%54%8%
2016-1718%57%7%
2017-1817%54%9%
2018-1916%58%8%
2019-2017%55%8%
2020-2118%67%6%
2021-2217%54%10%
2022-2316%59%7%
2023-2414%58%8%
2024-2515%58%7%
2025-2617%62%5%
  • 1967-68: Expansion to 12
Gaps between consecutive regular-season games of the same team, in calendar days off (a back-to-back is 0). Two-day gaps are not drawn; the three lines and the two-day share add to 100%. Short seasons as in the first chart. The 2004-05 season was cancelled.

The worst stretches went first. In 1958-59 a team played four games in five days about three times a season. Since 2011-12 it has happened no more than two times in the whole league in any season, and in many seasons not at all. The 2026-27 schedule adds two games, for 84, and still cuts back-to-backs. “The NHL will play 84 games this season, two more than it did a year ago, but teams will actually play fewer back-to-backs,” The Hockey News reported in September: 377 back-to-back appearances, against 430 the year before. That is 11.5 a team for every 82 games. Only one season since 1939-40 had fewer: 2023-24.

The goalie got the second night off

The league also changed who played the second night, starting in goal. In the Original Six era, the man who played Saturday played Sunday. Harry Lumley started both nights of 26 back-to-backs for Toronto in 1954-55, the most in a season since at least 1942-43. In 2023-24, nobody in the league did it more than twice.

The goalie who played Saturday used to play Sunday. Now he rarely does

Share of back-to-back second nights started by the goalie who started the night before, every regular season since 1942-43

Show data
The same goalie started both nights 100% of the time in 1952-53, 36% in 1970-71 and 4.5% in 2023-24.
SeasonSame goalie both nights
1942-43100%
1943-4496%
1944-4596%
1945-4693%
1946-4798%
1947-4897%
1948-4997%
1949-5097%
1950-5195%
1951-5298%
1952-53100%
1953-5498%
1954-5594%
1955-5698%
1956-5799%
1957-5898%
1958-5997%
1959-6095%
1960-6193%
1961-6294%
1962-6390%
1963-6487%
1964-6581%
1965-6679%
1966-6763%
1967-6868%
1968-6966%
1969-7057%
1970-7136%
1971-7235%
1972-7341%
1973-7452%
1974-7546%
1975-7646%
1976-7747%
1977-7845%
1978-7942%
1979-8039%
1980-8137%
1981-8244%
1982-8341%
1983-8436%
1984-8538%
1985-8633%
1986-8736%
1987-8844%
1988-8940%
1989-9037%
1990-9141%
1991-9247%
1992-9347%
1993-9443%
1994-9554%
1995-9651%
1996-9748%
1997-9843%
1998-9945%
1999-0046%
2000-0148%
2001-0241%
2002-0346%
2003-0444%
2004-05–
2005-0649%
2006-0743%
2007-0848%
2008-0947%
2009-1041%
2010-1144%
2011-1240%
2012-1344%
2013-1432%
2014-1532%
2015-1628%
2016-1728%
2017-1822%
2018-1919%
2019-2012%
2020-2115%
2021-2215%
2022-2311%
2023-245%
2024-257%
2025-268%
  • 1965-66: Two goalies dressed
  • 2013-14: Second drop
Starting goalies from the NHL’s per-game goalie records; every second night in every season has both starters recorded. Second nights per season: 68 to 521. Teams have had to dress two goalies every regular-season game since 1965-66. The 2004-05 season was cancelled.

It fell in two steps. The first came with the two-goalie rule of the mid-1960s, which our goalie workload story tells: from 87% in 1963-64 to 36% in 1970-71. For the next four decades the starter took roughly a third to a half of second nights. Then, from 2013-14, it fell again, to 22% in 2017-18 and single digits by 2023-24.

Martin Brodeur started both nights of 174 back-to-backs from 1967-68 on, the most of anyone, two ahead of Tony Esposito’s 172. Cam Ward did it 18 times in 2010-11 alone. Nobody now does it more than a handful of times. Our Prop Lab study of goalies and their teams tested whether the fresh goalie explains how tired teams do; this story asks only what the tired team loses.

But night two still costs about four wins in every 100 games

So the schedule thinned out, the trains became charters and the goalie got the night off. The second night should have become cheaper. It did not. Since 1917-18 there have been 14,876 games in which a team on the second night of a back-to-back met an opponent that had at least a day off. For each one, we worked out what should have happened from the two teams’ records over the rest of that season, plus home ice. The tired team won about 4 fewer games in every 100 than that.

A game still tied after regulation counts as half a win. A 2-2 tie in the 1950s and a shootout loss today count the same, so every era is measured with one ruler. A game that should have been a coin flip became roughly 46-54 against the tired team. It won 42% of these games outright.

The second-night cost has barely moved from era to era

A tired team’s wins per 100 games against a rested opponent, minus what both teams’ records and home ice predict

The cost ran from −3.4 to −5.5 wins per 100 games in every era, −4.3 overall.

1917-18 to 1941-42n 305
−3.7
1942-43 to 1966-67 (Original Six)n 890
−4.4
1967-68 to 1978-79n 1,756
−4.1
1979-80 to 1991-92n 2,429
−4.3
1992-93 to 2003-04n 3,546
−4.7
2005-06 to 2016-17n 3,653
−3.4
2017-18 to 2025-26n 2,297
−5.5
All seasonsn 14,876
−4.3
Tired = no day off; rested opponent = one or more days off. A game level after regulation counts as half a win. Expected from both teams’ season results without this game and the season’s home edge. 90% ranges: 1917-18 to 1941-42 −7.7 to +0.3; 1942-43 to 1966-67 −6.8 to −2.0; 1967-68 to 1978-79 −5.7 to −2.6; 1979-80 to 1991-92 −5.7 to −2.9; 1992-93 to 2003-04 −5.9 to −3.5; 2005-06 to 2016-17 −4.5 to −2.2; 2017-18 to 2025-26 −7.0 to −4.1. The Original Six figure depends on the strength adjustment (see text).

Every era lands within a couple of wins per 100 of the overall figure. Tired teams in the 1970s gave up 4.0 wins per 100. In the 2010s they gave up 3.5.

Slice the century any way and the price comes out the same

If those four wins were a fluke of a few odd seasons, they would vanish when the seasons are sliced another way. They don’t. Draw a straight line through the decades and it is flat: the cost moves −0.08 wins per 100 a decade. Nine times in ten, the true slope sits somewhere from −0.35 to +0.20 a decade. Even the steep end of that would move the price by only about 2 wins per 100 over the six decades since expansion.

Now split the seasons in half by the calendar. Put 1983-84 in one pile and 1984-85 in the other, and keep going for 108 seasons, as if two leagues had played them. The odd-year pile gives −4.4 and the even-year pile −4.3. Cut it into three instead: the league before 1967-68 gives −4.2, the expansion years to 1991-92 −4.2, and everything since −4.4.

Two stretches are less certain. In the 890 Original Six games, the answer depends on how you allow for team quality: about 4 fewer wins per 100 if you account for how good each team was, and about none if you account only for home ice. So that era is uncertain. Before 1942 there are only 305 such games, about one modern season’s worth: 2025-26 alone had 282. Nine times in ten the true cost for those early years sits somewhere from −7.7 to +0.3, so no cost at all can’t be ruled out.

At the other end, the most recent seasons look a little worse than the long-run figure: −4.8 from 2017-18 to 2020-21 and −6.0 since. That comes right after the mildest of our eras, −3.4 from 2005-06 to 2016-17. One season on its own swings further than that. Tired teams in 2024-25 came out −8.3; a year later, −4.0. That could be luck until it repeats. For what the modern cost means for betting, see our back-to-back betting study.

It’s the zero-rest night, not the grind

If the cost hasn’t moved, what is it made of? Coaches tend to blame what surrounds a back-to-back. “It’s not so much the back-to-back. It’s what goes on around the back-to-back,” Florida’s Paul Maurice told ESPN in 2024. “A back-to-back is not that difficult.” The data says close to the opposite.

Start with the grind. If wear piled up, a third game in four nights should hurt more than a plain back-to-back. It doesn’t. It costs −4.6 wins per 100, against −4.3 for all back-to-backs together, too close to tell apart. Next, rest as a dial. If more rest kept helping, a team with two days off should beat a team with one. It doesn’t: the team with one day off came out +0.2, which is nothing. Travel looks small too. Tired teams that played both nights in the same building lost about 3 wins per 100. Those that changed cities lost about 4. That gap could be luck. What costs a team is the night with no day off in front of it.

Only the night with no rest costs a team

Wins per 100 games compared with what both teams’ records and home ice predict, 1917-18 to 2025-26

Only the zero-rest night costs: −4.3 for a plain back-to-back and −4.6 for a third game in four nights, against +0.2 for one day off versus two and 0.0 on the night before a back-to-back.

Back-to-back vs rested teamn 14,876
−4.3
Third game in four nightsn 7,738
−4.6
Back-to-back, same buildingn 808
−3.1
Back-to-back, changed cityn 14,068
−4.4
One day off vs two or moren 15,520
+0.2
Check: rested tonight, playing tomorrown 12,323
0.0
Check game: the night before a back-to-back, when the team is rested but plays again tomorrow, against a rested opponent that doesn’t (n 12,323). If our expectation were biased against teams with busy schedules, this would show a cost. 90% ranges: back-to-back −4.9 to −3.8; third in four −5.4 to −3.8; same building −5.6 to −0.7; changed city −5.0 to −3.8; one day vs two −0.4 to +0.7; check game −0.7 to +0.6.

We also checked the yardstick. Take a team that is rested tonight but plays again tomorrow, against a rested opponent that doesn’t. Nothing about tonight is tiring. If our predictions were simply unfair to teams with busy schedules, those games would still show a cost. Across 12,323 of them they come out 0.0. When both teams are on a second night, the home team does about what its record and home ice predict: +0.3 over 5,578 games.

Fourteen games from home, and a holiday curse that didn’t last

Travel left no clear mark on those numbers. Players remember the road differently. Vancouver once played 14 straight road games over 40 days in 2010, from Jan. 30 to March 10, with the Olympics in its building and a 15-day break in the middle, and went 8-5-1. “(It was also) which day it is, what time it is, where am I really,” Alex Burrows said when it was over. Arizona matched the 14 games in 2022-23, from Nov. 5 to Dec. 7, 2022. “I don’t know if my kids will remember me when I walk in the door,” Zack Kassian said. Our numbers can’t weigh a trip like that. They have game dates, not flight times.

Two teams have gone 14 games without a home game

The longest road trips are 14 games (Vancouver 2010, Arizona 2022); next is the 2021-22 New York Islanders’ 13.

Longest road trip14 games
Vancouver 2009-10 (8-5-1, Olympic break inside); Arizona 2022-23 (4-7-3)
Next longest13 games
New York Islanders, Oct. 14 to Nov. 16, 2021 (5-6-2)

A bad trip can also look like a curse. Philadelphia shares its arena with the 76ers, Disney on Ice and, the Inquirer counted, 59 or so concerts. “It’s got to be Flyers first, whether its the family shows, the concerts and Sixers,” the team’s chairman, Dave Scott, told the Philadelphia Inquirer in January 2020, as the Flyers prepared to take their schedule to the league. They had gone 3-15-4 on their last five holiday road trips, that season’s included, the Inquirer reported, and our records give the same 3-15-4. That is 23% of the available points, against 53% in their other 176 road games those seasons. Pick 22 of those other road games at random, and a set that bad turns up less than 1% of the time.

It looked like a curse. It was a bad run, picked out because it was bad. In the five holiday trips since, the Flyers went 10-11-4, 48% of the points, close to their usual road rate. In 2005-06, a decade before the bad run, the same holiday trip ran eleven games, from Dec. 23 to Jan. 12, and they went 8-2-1. The recent back-to-back seasons get the same test. A bad stretch counts only if it comes back.

Some teams draw more second nights, but it costs them little

If every second night costs the same, the teams that draw the most of them should pay the most. Players notice who drew the short straw. Pittsburgh has 15 back-to-backs in 2026-27; Calgary and Vegas have eight. “Some teams have way more back-to-backs than others, which I don’t understand how that works,” Nick Foligno told ESPN in 2024. Aaron Ekblad, the Florida defenceman, had a simpler plan: “Abolish them. Get rid of them.”

The bill is smaller than the complaint. A typical team in 2025-26 played tired against a rested opponent about 9 times, which at the long-run cost comes to about 0.8 standings points over the season. But every one of those games has a rested team on the other side, so a typical team is also the rested side about as often and wins back about as much. What a schedule can cost is the difference. In each full season since 2005-06, the team with the hardest schedule had 9 to 21 more of those tired nights, net, than the team with the easiest. That gap is worth about 1.4 standings points. The widest ever was 1971-72, between the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Buffalo Sabres: about 2.1 points.

The heaviest back-to-back schedules ever, and the lightest since 1942-43

The most back-to-backs for a schedule’s length is Boston’s 28 in 70 games in 1964-65; the most in one season is 30, by Pittsburgh and Detroit in 1978-79; the fewest for a schedule’s length since 1942-43 is Winnipeg’s 5 in 80 games in 1991-92.

Most back-to-backs, for the season’s length28 in 70
Boston 1964-65, 32.8 for every 82 games
Most back-to-backs in one season30
Pittsburgh and Detroit, 1978-79 (80 games)
Fewest since 1942-43, for the season’s length5 in 80
Winnipeg 1991-92, 5.1 for every 82 games; then Vegas 2022-23, 7
2026-27 schedule15 vs 8
Pittsburgh most; Calgary and Vegas fewest (84 games)

Fewer second nights, at the same price

  • Measured per team, the back-to-back load is less than half what it was in the six-team league (11.5 for every 82 games on the 2026-27 schedule, against 29.1 in 1958-59).
  • Each second night against a rested team still costs about what it has since expansion. The schedule makers have delivered fewer of them, at the same price.
  • Over a season that adds up to a point or two between the luckiest and unluckiest schedules: enough to argue about, rarely enough to decide a playoff spot.

Lumley played both nights. Almost nobody does now

The 2026-27 schedule has 377 back-to-back appearances in 84 games. Each one that meets a rested opponent should cost about what a second night has cost since expansion. Whether it cost the same in 1950, the winter the Rangers and Red Wings rode a late train east while amateurs held the Garden ice, the old records can’t quite say.

Harry Lumley started both nights 26 times in one season. The league leader in 2023-24 did it twice. The goalie got his night off. The schedule got kinder. The second night still costs the tired team about four wins in every 100.

Share this article

Post on X

Goalie tools

Live Edgehalla tools on the same subject.

All NHL tools

Show the work

Tests written down
Not in advance (exploratory)
Results computed

Every regular-season game from 1917-18 to 2025-26 from the NHL’s game list (date, teams, final score, last period), and the published 2026-27 schedule for its shape only. Rest days = calendar days since the team’s previous game, minus one; a season opener has no rest value and is left out. A back-to-back second night = no day off. The main comparison takes every game where one team had no day off and the other had at least one (14,876 team-games). Result: regulation win 1, level after regulation 0.5, regulation loss 0. Expected: both teams’ season results without this game, combined on the log-odds scale with the season’s home edge. Intervals are 90%, from game-level standard errors. Starting goalies come from the NHL’s per-game goalie records. Win share is reported in points per 100 games: 4.3 points means about 4 fewer wins in every 100. Not pre-registered: the eras, the placebo and the robustness splits were chosen after the first look at the data, and are all reported.

Every test we graded (25 comparisons, no formal correction. The main finding is one contrast (tired vs rested); the rest are robustness checks, and a split counts only if it repeats.)
TestResultVerdict
Tired team vs rested opponent, all seasons−4.3 (90% range −4.9 to −3.8), n 14,876; win % 42.3; home-only baseline −3.9Real

More tests below

Rows 2–6 of 15
TestResultVerdict
The cost changed over timeSlope −0.08 per decade (90% −0.35 to +0.20); eras −3.4 to −5.5No trend
Holdout: odd vs even seasons−4.4 (n 7,972) vs −4.3 (n 6,904)Repeats
Holdout: before 1967-68 / 1967-92 / 1992-2026−4.2 / −4.2 / −4.4 (n 1,195 / 4,185 / 9,496)Repeats
Original Six era (1942-43 to 1966-67)−4.4 (90% range −6.8 to −2.0), n 890; home-only baseline 0.0Uncertain: depends on the adjustment
The cost grew in the 2020s2017-21 −4.8 (90% range −7.1 to −2.4) (n 897); 2021-26 −6.0 (90% range −7.9 to −4.1) (n 1,400); 2017-26 −5.5Noise so far

Continues below

Rows 7–12 of 15
TestResultVerdict
Placebo: the night before a back-to-back0.0 (90% range −0.7 to +0.6), n 12,323Passes (no cost)
Both teams tired: home side vs home edge+0.3, n 5,578Passes
A second day off helps+0.2 (90% range −0.4 to +0.7), n 15,520No
A third game in four nights costs more−4.6 (90% range −5.4 to −3.8), n 7,738No
Travel adds to the costSame building −3.1 (90% range −5.6 to −0.7) (n 808) vs changed city −4.4 (90% range −5.0 to −3.8) (n 14,068)Can’t tell
Matches our Prop Lab win rates (2021-22, 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26)38.5% (n 317), 43.3% (n 247), 37.7% (n 281), 43.3% (n 282)Agrees with the published Prop Lab rates within half a point each season

Continues below

Rows 13–15 of 15
TestResultVerdict
Flyers holiday trips 2015-16 to 2019-20 were unusually bad3-15-4, 22.7% of points vs 53.4% other road games; random 22-game sets that bad 0.09% of 20,000; next five trips 10-11-4 (48.0%)One run, chosen after the fact; did not repeat
What the cost means in standings pointsAbout 8.8 tired-vs-rested games per team in 2025-26 × 0.086 points per game (2 × the all-era cost) ≈ 0.8 standings points a seasonSmall
Schedule luck between teamsNet tired-vs-rested games, most minus fewest: 9 to 21 a season since 2005-06 (full seasons), about 1.4 standings pointsReal but small

Frequently asked questions

How many back-to-backs does an NHL team play in a season?

About 13 in 2025-26 (430 across the league), and 11.8 on average on the 84-game 2026-27 schedule (377). Pittsburgh has the most in 2026-27 with 15; Calgary and Vegas the fewest with 8. In 1958-59 teams averaged 24.8 in a 70-game season.

Do NHL teams lose more on the second night of a back-to-back?

Yes. Across 14,876 games since 1917-18 against a rested opponent, tired teams won about 4 fewer games in every 100 than their records and home ice predicted (4.3 per 100, counting a game level after regulation as half a win), and won 42% outright. The cost is about the same in every era since 1967; the earlier estimates are less certain.

What is the longest road trip in NHL history?

Fourteen games, shared by the 2009-10 Vancouver Canucks (Jan. 30, 2010 to March 10, 2010, around the Vancouver Olympics, 8-5-1) and the 2022-23 Arizona Coyotes (Nov. 5, 2022 to Dec. 7, 2022). The 2021-22 New York Islanders played 13 straight on the road.

Has the NHL reduced back-to-backs?

Yes, for decades. Back-to-backs per team, for every 82 games played, peaked at 29.1 in 1958-59 and fell to 11.2 in 2023-24 and 11.5 on the 2026-27 schedule. Average rest between games barely changed; the league spread the same rest more evenly.

Do NHL goalies play both games of a back-to-back?

Rarely now. The same goalie started both nights 4.5% of the time in 2023-24 and 8.1% in 2025-26, against more than 90% in the 1950s. Martin Brodeur did it 174 times from 1967-68 on, the most of anyone.

Does a third game in four nights hurt NHL teams more?

Not measurably. Against a rested opponent, a third game in four nights cost −4.6 wins per 100 games compared with expectation, about the same as a plain back-to-back (−4.3). An extra day off beyond the first made no difference (+0.2).

More in Standings and results

All How Hockey Changed research

Sources and method

  1. NHL stats (NHL.com), every season since 1917-18
  2. NHL stats API: every regular-season game since 1917-18 (date, teams, score)
  3. NHL stats API: goalie results by game (starting goalies)
  4. The Hockey News, Stan Fischler: The Met Leaguers who saved a Rangers game (Dec. 25, 2024)
  5. ESPN, Ryan S. Clark: How NHL players and teams deal with the grind of back-to-back games (Feb. 14, 2024)
  6. The Hockey News, Tytan Durgan: Which NHL team has the toughest schedule? A deep dive into back-to-backs (Sept. 29, 2026)
  7. Philadelphia Inquirer, Sam Carchidi: Flyers will meet with NHL in effort to reduce back-to-back games (Jan. 28, 2020)
  8. The Hockey News (The Canadian Press): Canucks finally home after epic 14-game road trip (Mar. 12, 2010)
  9. The Hockey News, Avry Lewis-McDougall: Arizona Coyotes are back home after 14-game road trip (Dec. 9, 2022)
  10. Associated Press, Stephen Whyno, via Boston.com: An 84-game season is among the changes coming to the NHL (June 27, 2025)
  11. NHL API reference (community documentation of the stats endpoints)

Research and analysis, not betting advice. Past results do not guarantee future returns; bet only what you can afford to lose.