Calgary Flames vs. Anaheim DucksDec 3, 2021

Final / SOFriday, Dec 3, 2021· Honda Center

away

home

Goals	1	2	3	OT	SO	T		Shots	1	2	3	OT	T
CGY	0	3	0	0	1	4		CGY	12	12	10	2	36
ANA	0	2	1	0	0	3		ANA	14	8	10	2	34

: CGY 61ANA 64
: CGY 3.58ANA 3.32
PP goals: CGY 0ANA 1
Hits: CGY 35ANA 20
Blocks: CGY 18ANA 11
PIM: CGY 18ANA 4
: CGY 45%ANA 55%

Fantasy takeaways

Generated from the play-by-play, shifts and season context. No opinions, just what changed.

Calgary Flames edge Anaheim Ducks 4–3 (SO)

Calgary Flames beat Anaheim Ducks 4–3 in a shootout at ANA. Sean Monahan (CGY) led the scoring with 1G 1A. New look for CGY: Lucic–Backlund–Mangiapane skated 13:40 together at 5v5 as the L2 trio (41.7% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.

Points
Sean Monahan had a goal and an assist (2 points) on 4 shots in 16:09.Monahan
Points
Trevor Lewis had 2 assists (2 points) in 16:28.Lewis
Points
Trevor Zegras had 2 assists (2 points) on 3 shots in 18:25.Zegras
New line
New look for CGY: Lucic–Backlund–Mangiapane skated 13:40 together at 5v5 as the L2 trio (41.7% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Lucic Backlund Mangiapane
Usage
Isac Lundeström (ANA) played 20:46, +5:21 up on his 15:25 season average over 79 games.Lundeström
Goalie
John Gibson (ANA) faced 36 shots and stopped 33 (.917), +4 against a season average of 31.9; the overtime loss.Gibson
Usage
Adam Henrique (ANA) played 9:57, −7:36 down on his 17:33 season average over 57 games.Henrique
New line
New look for CGY: Lewis–Coleman–Monahan skated 13:35 together at 5v5 as the L3 trio (59.4% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Lewis Coleman Monahan

Shot map

Both teams on one rink, filtered by strength and period.

Shot map

Every attempt, sized by expected goals. Goals are rings, shots on goal dots, misses hollow, blocks crosses.

Strength

Period

Team

← CGY attacks left (bottom on phones)ANA attacks right (top on phones) →

ANA
CGY
Goal
Shot on goal
Missed
Blocked

Showing 125 of 125 attempts · ANA 64 · CGY 61

Game flow

Cumulative expected goals and shot attempts, with power plays shaded and goals marked.

Cumulative shot attempts

ANA
CGY
Goal
Power play (shaded)

Pressure Index

ANA pressure
CGY pressure
Goal
Control (|PI| > 0.25)

: descriptive only, the team with more pressure scored the next goal about half the time. In control: CGY 33% of the game, ANA 30%.

Shift chart

Every shift, grouped by line and pair; bars are coloured by strength state. Click a player to highlight.

Shifts

ANA

CGY

goals / penalties

Even strength
Power play
Penalty kill
Goal
Penalty

Sequence card

5-on-5 possession-chain numbers from the sequence engine (Draw Equity and control cover all situations).

Sequence card
Stat	CGY	ANA
	64	61
	3.65	3.38
	3.56	3.12
	17	14
	6	6
	13	20
	−0.067	+0.067
	33%	30%

Definitions: sequence xG, transition attempts, Draw Equity, control and the Pressure Index.

Lines used

Detected from who actually shared the ice, with time together. Percentages are the unit's share of shot attempts.

Calgary Flames

L1Gaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk
15:1950% CF
L2Lucic – Backlund – Mangiapane
13:4042% CF
L3Lewis – Coleman – Monahan
13:3559% CF
L4Richardson – Pitlick – Dube
4:4742% CF
D1Tanev – Kylington
16:4748% CF
D2Hanifin – Andersson
16:2965% CF
D3Gudbranson – Zadorov
13:3640% CF

PP1Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan – Andersson – Tkachuk
1:13100% CF
PP2Lucic – Backlund – Mangiapane – Hanifin – Kylington
0:47
PK1FBacklund – Lindholm
2:13
PK2FRichardson – Lewis
1:33
PK1DTanev – Gudbranson
2:57
PK2DHanifin – Andersson
0:51

Current CGY line combinations →

Anaheim Ducks

L1Grant – Silfverberg – Lundeström
13:2248% CF
L2Rakell – Milano – Zegras
12:1248% CF
L3Henrique – Terry – Steel
7:1055% CF
L4Deslauriers – Carrick – Lettieri
6:2250% CF
D1Lindholm – Drysdale
17:1647% CF
D2Fowler – Manson
16:5553% CF
D3Shattenkirk – Benoit
12:0741% CF

PP1Shattenkirk – Henrique – Silfverberg – Fowler – Terry
2:37100% CF
PP2Rakell – Lindholm – Milano – Zegras – Drysdale
1:54
PK1FGrant – Carrick
0:47
PK2FDeslauriers – Lundeström
0:16
PK1DFowler – Manson
1:10
PK2DShattenkirk – Lindholm
0:37

Current ANA line combinations →

Scoring summary

Every goal with the skaters on the ice for it.

2nd period

0:54
ANASonny Milano (Josh Manson, Trevor Zegras)tip-in0.09 xG
CGY: Lewis, Coleman, Monahan, Hanifin, AnderssonANA: Fowler, Manson, Rakell, Milano, Zegras
CGY 0 – 1 ANA
3:49
CGYBlake Coleman (Sean Monahan, Trevor Lewis)wrist0.20 xG
CGY: Lewis, Gudbranson, Coleman, Monahan, ZadorovANA: Shattenkirk, Rakell, Milano, Benoit, Zegras
CGY 1 – 1 ANA
10:20
CGYElias Lindholm (Johnny Gaudreau)wrist0.14 xG
CGY: Tanev, Gaudreau, Lindholm, Kylington, TkachukANA: Silfverberg, Lindholm, Milano, Zegras, Drysdale
CGY 2 – 1 ANA
15:10
CGYSean Monahan (Trevor Lewis, Oliver Kylington)wrist0.21 xG
CGY: Lewis, Tanev, Coleman, Monahan, KylingtonANA: Silfverberg, Fowler, Manson, Steel, Zegras
CGY 3 – 1 ANA
19:24
ANARickard Rakell (Isac Lundeström, Hampus Lindholm)slap0.12 xG
CGY: Richardson, Tanev, Pitlick, Kylington, DubeANA: Grant, Rakell, Lindholm, Lundeström, Drysdale
CGY 3 – 2 ANA

3rd period

2:04
ANAVinni LettieriPP (Trevor Zegras, Jamie Drysdale)slap0.07 xG
CGY: Lewis, Coleman, Hanifin, AnderssonANA: Rakell, Milano, Lettieri, Zegras, Drysdale
CGY 3 – 3 ANA

Decided in the shootout: CGY 4 – 3 ANA.

Box score

Skaters grouped by the line they played on; CF% is the 5v5 share of shot attempts while on the ice.

Calgary Flames

CGY skaters
Skater	Line	G	A	P	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Elias Lindholm C	L1	1	0	1	+1	1	0.14	0	1	0	22:26	—	—	50	79
Johnny Gaudreau L	L1	0	1	1	+1	2	0.13	0	0	0	20:55	—	—	46	78
Matthew Tkachuk L	L1	0	0	0	+1	4	0.64	5	0	0	18:22	—	—	46	78
Mikael Backlund C	L2	0	0	0	0	1	0.00	2	0	0	22:07	—	—	39	17
Andrew Mangiapane L	L2	0	0	0	0	3	0.34	2	0	10	19:42	—	—	44	25
Milan Lucic L	L2	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	7	0	0	15:10	—	—	42	17
Trevor Lewis C	L3	0	2	2	+1	0	0.08	3	1	0	16:28	—	—	59	58
Sean Monahan C	L3	1	1	2	+1	4	0.99	0	0	0	16:09	—	—	63	62
Blake Coleman L	L3	1	0	1	+1	7	0.61	2	0	4	15:31	—	—	63	63
Brad Richardson R	L4	0	0	0	-1	0	0.05	2	0	0	6:28	—	—	42	41
Dillon Dube C	L4	0	0	0	-1	1	0.11	0	0	0	6:00	—	—	47	49
Tyler Pitlick C	L4	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	0	1	0	5:08	—	—	53	60
Chris Tanev D	D1	0	0	0	+1	1	0.03	0	5	0	24:19	—	—	54	80
Oliver Kylington D	D1	0	1	1	+1	3	0.09	1	2	0	22:12	—	—	43	57
Rasmus Andersson D	D2	0	0	0	-1	3	0.12	1	3	0	22:09	—	—	67	77
Noah Hanifin D	D2	0	0	0	-1	2	0.17	0	0	0	21:02	—	—	71	81
Erik Gudbranson D	D3	0	0	0	+1	3	0.07	7	4	2	18:44	—	—	36	25
Nikita Zadorov D	D3	0	0	0	+1	1	0.01	3	1	2	15:27	—	—	44	24

CGY goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
Dan Vladar(start)	W	34	31	3	.912	3.32	65:00

Anaheim Ducks

ANA skaters
Skater	Line	G	A	P	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Isac Lundeström C	L1	0	1	1	+1	2	0.27	1	0	0	20:46	—	—	53	36
Jakob Silfverberg R	L1	0	0	0	-2	1	0.01	1	1	2	20:14	—	—	45	26
Derek Grant C	L1	0	0	0	+1	2	0.01	1	1	0	17:14	—	—	52	36
Rickard Rakell R	L2	1	0	1	+1	4	0.49	0	0	0	21:50	—	—	46	54
Trevor Zegras C	L2	0	2	2	-2	3	0.34	0	0	2	18:25	—	—	47	50
Sonny Milano L	L2	1	0	1	-1	4	0.43	0	0	0	16:12	—	—	46	55
Troy Terry R	L3	0	0	0	0	1	0.29	0	0	0	20:14	—	—	52	46
Sam Steel C	L3	0	0	0	-1	3	0.08	1	0	0	15:57	—	—	54	37
Adam Henrique C	L3	0	0	0	0	1	0.20	1	0	0	9:57	—	—	55	54
Nicolas Deslauriers L	L4	0	0	0	0	0	0.06	1	1	0	10:18	—	—	44	67
Sam Carrick C	L4	0	0	0	0	0	0.17	2	0	0	8:02	—	—	50	79
Vinni Lettieri C	L4	1	0	1	0	1	0.07	2	0	0	7:32	—	—	50	71
Hampus Lindholm D	D1	0	1	1	0	1	0.04	2	1	0	25:18	—	—	48	53
Jamie Drysdale D	D1	0	1	1	0	1	0.32	0	3	0	21:08	—	—	46	53
Cam Fowler D	D2	0	0	0	0	3	0.23	0	2	0	24:44	—	—	53	33
Josh Manson D	D2	0	1	1	0	3	0.18	2	1	0	21:24	—	—	57	43
Kevin Shattenkirk D	D3	0	0	0	-1	3	0.11	0	0	0	17:12	—	—	43	47
Simon Benoit D	D3	0	0	0	-1	1	0.00	6	1	0	14:33	—	—	47	53

ANA goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
John Gibson(start)	O	36	33	3	.917	3.58	65:00

Methodology

Shot locations come from the NHL play-by-play, normalised so each shooter attacks the same way, then flipped so the home team attacks right. On-ice stats and lines come from the shift charts: a unit is the exact set of skaters sharing the ice, and CF% is the share of all shot attempts while they were out. Head-to-head cells are 5v5 time against each opponent. Expected goals and the Pressure Index appear as their models are released.