Nashville Predators vs. Anaheim DucksMar 12, 2019

FinalTuesday, Mar 12, 2019· Honda Center

away

home

Goals	1	2	3	T		Shots	1	2	3	T
NSH	0	0	2	2		NSH	9	10	15	34
ANA	2	1	0	3		ANA	8	8	2	18

: NSH 71ANA 45
: NSH 3.06ANA 2.21
PP goals: NSH 0ANA 0
Hits: NSH 18ANA 25
Blocks: NSH 12ANA 18
PIM: NSH 6ANA 14
: NSH 54%ANA 46%

Fantasy takeaways

Generated from the play-by-play, shifts and season context. No opinions, just what changed.

Anaheim Ducks edge Nashville Predators 3–2

Anaheim Ducks beat Nashville Predators 3–2 at home. Filip Forsberg (NSH) led the scoring with 2G 0A. New look for ANA: Grant–Rowney–Jones skated 8:33 together at 5v5 as the L1 trio (58.8% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.

Points
Filip Forsberg had two goals (2 points) on 6 shots in 20:55.Forsberg
Points
Mikael Granlund had 2 assists (2 points) on 1 shot in 18:15.Granlund
New line
New look for ANA: Grant–Rowney–Jones skated 8:33 together at 5v5 as the L1 trio (58.8% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Grant Rowney Jones
New line
New look for NSH: Simmonds–Johansen–Forsberg skated 8:18 together at 5v5 as the L1 trio (37.5% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Simmonds Johansen Forsberg
New line
New look for ANA: Getzlaf–Ritchie–Sprong skated 8:32 together at 5v5 as the L2 trio (64.3% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Getzlaf Ritchie Sprong
New line
New look for NSH: Boyle–Turris–Smith skated 8:18 together at 5v5 as the L2 trio (27.3% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Boyle Turris Smith
New line
New look for ANA: Perry–Henrique–Terry skated 8:16 together at 5v5 as the L3 trio (13.3% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Perry Henrique Terry
New line
New look for NSH: Bonino–Granlund–Arvidsson skated 5:44 together at 5v5 as the L3 trio (76.9% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Bonino Granlund Arvidsson

Shot map

Both teams on one rink, filtered by strength and period.

Shot map

Every attempt, sized by expected goals. Goals are rings, shots on goal dots, misses hollow, blocks crosses.

Strength

Period

Team

← NSH attacks left (bottom on phones)ANA attacks right (top on phones) →

ANA
NSH
Goal
Shot on goal
Missed
Blocked

Showing 116 of 116 attempts · ANA 45 · NSH 71

Game flow

Cumulative expected goals and shot attempts, with power plays shaded and goals marked.

Cumulative shot attempts

ANA
NSH
Goal
Power play (shaded)

Pressure Index

ANA pressure
NSH pressure
Goal
Control (|PI| > 0.25)

: descriptive only, the team with more pressure scored the next goal about half the time. In control: NSH 51% of the game, ANA 20%.

Shift chart

Every shift, grouped by line and pair; bars are coloured by strength state. Click a player to highlight.

Shifts

ANA

NSH

goals / penalties

Even strength
Power play
Penalty kill
Goal
Penalty

Sequence card

5-on-5 possession-chain numbers from the sequence engine (Draw Equity and control cover all situations).

Sequence card
Stat	NSH	ANA
	55	46
	1.84	1.57
	1.74	1.50
	7	10
	5	7
	14	13
	+0.057	−0.057
	51%	20%

Definitions: sequence xG, transition attempts, Draw Equity, control and the Pressure Index.

Lines used

Detected from who actually shared the ice, with time together. Percentages are the unit's share of shot attempts.