Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Calgary FlamesFeb 10, 2022

FinalThursday, Feb 10, 2022· Scotiabank Saddledome

away

home

Goals	1	2	3	T		Shots	1	2	3	T
TOR	0	1	1	2		TOR	18	14	16	48
CGY	0	4	1	5		CGY	11	9	6	26

: TOR 72CGY 47
: TOR 2.44CGY 2.32
PP goals: TOR 0CGY 1
Hits: TOR 7CGY 18
Blocks: TOR 11CGY 13
PIM: TOR 14CGY 12
: TOR 59%CGY 41%

Fantasy takeaways

Generated from the play-by-play, shifts and season context. No opinions, just what changed.

Calgary Flames beat Toronto Maple Leafs 5–2

Calgary Flames beat Toronto Maple Leafs 5–2 at home. Rasmus Andersson (CGY) led the scoring with 1G 1A. Jacob Markstrom (CGY) faced 48 shots and stopped 46 (.958), +20 against a season average of 27.8; the win.

Points
Noah Hanifin had a goal and an assist (2 points) on 1 shot in 19:55.Hanifin
Points
Rasmus Andersson had a goal and an assist (2 points) on 2 shots in 20:41.Andersson
Points
Mikael Backlund had 2 assists (2 points) on 3 shots in 18:39.Backlund
Goalie
Jacob Markstrom (CGY) faced 48 shots and stopped 46 (.958), +20 against a season average of 27.8; the win.Markstrom
Usage
Ondrej Kase (TOR) played 4:17, −9:54 down on his 14:11 season average over 49 games.Kase
Luck
CGY scored 5 goals on 2.32 expected goals (47 attempts), finishing well above its chances.
New line
New look for TOR: Engvall–Kampf–Mikheyev skated 6:29 together at 5v5 as the L3 trio (100% of the shot attempts), a combination not used in the team's last 5 games.Engvall Kampf Mikheyev
Usage
Travis Dermott (TOR) played 8:38, −6:49 down on his 15:27 season average over 59 games.Dermott

Shot map

Both teams on one rink, filtered by strength and period.

Shot map

Every attempt, sized by expected goals. Goals are rings, shots on goal dots, misses hollow, blocks crosses.

Strength

Period

Team

← TOR attacks left (bottom on phones)CGY attacks right (top on phones) →

CGY
TOR
Goal
Shot on goal
Missed
Blocked

Showing 119 of 119 attempts · CGY 47 · TOR 72

Game flow

Cumulative expected goals and shot attempts, with power plays shaded and goals marked.

Cumulative shot attempts

CGY
TOR
Goal
Power play (shaded)

Pressure Index

CGY pressure
TOR pressure
Goal
Control (|PI| > 0.25)

: descriptive only, the team with more pressure scored the next goal about half the time. In control: TOR 34% of the game, CGY 24%.

Shift chart

Every shift, grouped by line and pair; bars are coloured by strength state. Click a player to highlight.

Shifts

CGY

TOR

goals / penalties

Even strength
Power play
Penalty kill
Goal
Penalty

Sequence card

5-on-5 possession-chain numbers from the sequence engine (Draw Equity and control cover all situations).

Sequence card
Stat	TOR	CGY
	68	44
	2.25	2.12
	2.20	2.05
	10	8
	8	6
	13	10
	+0.077	−0.077
	34%	24%

Definitions: sequence xG, transition attempts, Draw Equity, control and the Pressure Index.

Lines used

Detected from who actually shared the ice, with time together. Percentages are the unit's share of shot attempts.

Toronto Maple Leafs

L1Bunting – Marner – Matthews
10:3478% CF
L2Tavares – Kerfoot – Nylander
7:3365% CF
L3Engvall – Kampf – Mikheyev
6:29100% CF
D1Brodie – Rielly
12:4345% CF
D2Muzzin – Holl
11:4163% CF
D3Liljegren – Sandin
5:3067% CF

PP1Tavares – Rielly – Nylander – Marner – Matthews
3:5675% CF
PP2Spezza – Bunting – Kase – Sandin – Mikheyev
1:24
PK1FMarner – Kampf
2:34
PK2FKerfoot – Mikheyev
1:09
PK1DMuzzin – Holl
2:45
PK2DBrodie – Rielly
1:38

Current TOR line combinations →

Calgary Flames

L1Backlund – Coleman – Mangiapane
11:2350% CF
L2Gaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk
10:3750% CF
L3Lewis – Lucic – Ruzicka
9:2410% CF
L4Ritchie – Monahan – Dube
6:2643% CF
D1Tanev – Kylington
13:3638% CF
D2Hanifin – Andersson
12:3139% CF
D3Gudbranson – Zadorov
12:2041% CF

PP1Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan – Andersson – Tkachuk
3:4667% CF
PP2Lucic – Backlund – Mangiapane – Hanifin – Kylington
3:0025% CF
PK1FMangiapane – Dube
1:41
PK2FBacklund – Lindholm
1:09
PK1DTanev – Gudbranson
2:53
PK2DHanifin – Andersson
2:30

Current CGY line combinations →

Scoring summary

Every goal with the skaters on the ice for it.

2nd period

3:49
TORRasmus Sandin (William Nylander, John Tavares)slap0.00 xG
TOR: Tavares, Kerfoot, Nylander, Liljegren, SandinCGY: Gaudreau, Lindholm, Hanifin, Andersson, Tkachuk
TOR 1 – 0 CGY
4:13
CGYAndrew Mangiapane (Mikael Backlund, Blake Coleman)wrist0.17 xG
TOR: Muzzin, Holl, Bunting, Marner, MatthewsCGY: Backlund, Tanev, Coleman, Mangiapane, Kylington
TOR 1 – 1 CGY
13:03
CGYNoah Hanifin (Rasmus Andersson, Matthew Tkachuk)wrist0.14 xG
TOR: Tavares, Kerfoot, Nylander, Liljegren, SandinCGY: Gaudreau, Lindholm, Hanifin, Andersson, Tkachuk
TOR 1 – 2 CGY
13:35
CGYOliver KylingtonPP (Noah Hanifin, Mikael Backlund)slap0.05 xG
TOR: Muzzin, Holl, Marner, KampfCGY: Lucic, Backlund, Mangiapane, Hanifin, Kylington
TOR 1 – 3 CGY
15:54
CGYElias Lindholm (Johnny Gaudreau, Chris Tanev)wrist0.08 xG
TOR: Muzzin, Holl, Kerfoot, Nylander, MatthewsCGY: Tanev, Gaudreau, Lindholm, Kylington, Tkachuk
TOR 1 – 4 CGY

3rd period

1:16
CGYRasmus Anderssonwrist0.02 xG
TOR: Tavares, Holl, Rielly, Kerfoot, NylanderCGY: Gaudreau, Lindholm, Hanifin, Andersson, Tkachuk
TOR 1 – 5 CGY
5:06
TORMichael Bunting (Auston Matthews, Timothy Liljegren)wrist0.06 xG
TOR: Bunting, Marner, Matthews, Liljegren, SandinCGY: Backlund, Coleman, Mangiapane, Hanifin, Andersson
TOR 2 – 5 CGY

Box score

Skaters grouped by the line they played on; CF% is the 5v5 share of shot attempts while on the ice.

Toronto Maple Leafs

TOR skaters
Skater	Line	G	A	P	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Mitch Marner R	L1	0	0	0	0	10	0.51	0	0	0	21:59	—	—	74	70
Auston Matthews C	L1	0	1	1	-1	8	0.59	0	0	0	19:32	—	—	68	56
Michael Bunting L	L1	1	0	1	0	2	0.23	1	0	0	14:35	—	—	55	54
William Nylander R	L2	0	1	1	-2	1	0.06	0	2	2	20:03	—	—	45	38
John Tavares C	L2	0	1	1	-1	5	0.31	1	1	0	18:46	—	—	50	41
Alexander Kerfoot C	L2	0	0	0	-2	2	0.10	1	0	0	16:49	—	—	53	35
Ilya Mikheyev R	L3	0	0	0	0	1	0.01	0	0	0	16:41	—	—	87	64
Pierre Engvall L	L3	0	0	0	0	3	0.21	1	0	0	15:09	—	—	65	40
David Kampf C	L3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0	2	2	14:54	—	—	67	55
Morgan Rielly D	D1	0	0	0	-1	3	0.07	1	1	4	23:30	—	—	52	34
TJ Brodie D	D1	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	1	0	4	18:07	—	—	46	31
Jake Muzzin D	D2	0	0	0	-2	5	0.11	0	2	0	19:21	—	—	63	61
Justin Holl D	D2	0	0	0	-3	2	0.10	0	2	2	19:12	—	—	62	57
Rasmus Sandin D	D3	1	0	1	+1	1	0.00	0	0	0	14:39	—	—	74	56
Timothy Liljegren D	D3	0	1	1	+1	1	0.03	1	0	0	13:10	—	—	67	64
Jason Spezza C	—	0	0	0	0	1	0.02	0	0	0	12:30	—	—	63	53
Travis Dermott D	—	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0	1	0	8:38	—	—	64	99
Ondrej Kase R	—	0	0	0	0	3	0.10	0	0	0	4:17	—	—	91	79

TOR goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
Jack Campbell(start)	L	26	21	5	.808	2.32	59:58

Calgary Flames

CGY skaters
Skater	Line	G	A	P	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Mikael Backlund C	L1	0	2	2	0	3	0.36	2	0	2	18:39	—	—	48	51
Andrew Mangiapane L	L1	1	0	1	0	2	0.18	0	0	0	18:26	—	—	48	51
Blake Coleman L	L1	0	1	1	0	1	0.00	2	1	2	15:38	—	—	48	51
Elias Lindholm C	L2	1	0	1	+2	3	0.15	0	2	0	19:49	—	—	45	55
Johnny Gaudreau L	L2	0	1	1	+2	1	0.28	0	0	0	17:28	—	—	50	60
Matthew Tkachuk L	L2	0	1	1	+2	2	0.27	2	1	0	17:14	—	—	46	56
Milan Lucic L	L3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	1	0	0	14:51	—	—	14	18
Trevor Lewis C	L3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	3	0	0	14:19	—	—	12	13
Adam Ruzicka C	L3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0	0	0	11:16	—	—	10	4
Sean Monahan C	L4	0	0	0	0	4	0.47	0	0	2	12:42	—	—	38	63
Dillon Dube C	L4	0	0	0	0	1	0.14	1	0	0	9:21	—	—	33	51
Brett Ritchie R	L4	0	0	0	0	1	0.07	3	0	0	7:42	—	—	44	77
Chris Tanev D	D1	0	1	1	+2	2	0.04	0	3	0	21:39	—	—	33	44
Oliver Kylington D	D1	1	0	1	+2	2	0.09	0	0	0	19:54	—	—	44	48
Rasmus Andersson D	D2	1	1	2	0	2	0.12	0	2	0	20:41	—	—	39	50
Noah Hanifin D	D2	1	1	2	0	1	0.14	0	1	0	19:55	—	—	38	56
Erik Gudbranson D	D3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	2	3	2	18:48	—	—	32	36
Nikita Zadorov D	D3	0	0	0	0	1	0.01	2	0	4	15:38	—	—	52	61

CGY goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
Jacob Markstrom(start)	W	48	46	2	.958	2.44	60:00

Methodology

Shot locations come from the NHL play-by-play, normalised so each shooter attacks the same way, then flipped so the home team attacks right. On-ice stats and lines come from the shift charts: a unit is the exact set of skaters sharing the ice, and CF% is the share of all shot attempts while they were out. Head-to-head cells are 5v5 time against each opponent. Expected goals and the Pressure Index appear as their models are released.