Utah Mammoth vs. Philadelphia FlyersMar 5, 2026

FinalThursday, Mar 5, 2026· Xfinity Mobile Arena

away

home

Goals	1	2	3	T		Shots	1	2	3	T
UTA	0	2	1	3		UTA	4	14	5	23
PHI	0	0	0	0		PHI	4	7	5	16

: UTA 57PHI 46
: UTA 3.81PHI 1.61
PP goals: UTA 1PHI 0
Hits: UTA 21PHI 29
Blocks: UTA 18PHI 17
PIM: UTA 6PHI 4
: UTA 50%PHI 50%

Fantasy takeaways

Generated from the play-by-play, shifts and season context. No opinions, just what changed.

Utah Mammoth beat Philadelphia Flyers 3–0

Utah Mammoth beat Philadelphia Flyers 3–0 at PHI. Nick Schmaltz (UTA) led the scoring with 1G 1A. PHI scored 0 goals on 1.61 expected goals (46 attempts), well short of its chances.

Points
Nick Schmaltz had a goal and an assist (2 points) on 2 shots in 19:34.Schmaltz
Points
Dylan Guenther had 2 assists (2 points) in 16:30.Guenther
Luck
PHI scored 0 goals on 1.61 expected goals (46 attempts), well short of its chances.
Usage
Owen Tippett (PHI) played 21:03, +4:16 up on his 16:47 season average over 80 games.Tippett
Usage
Bobby Brink (PHI) played 19:19, +4:13 up on his 15:06 season average over 67 games.Brink
Usage
Ian Cole (UTA) played 22:06, +3:53 up on his 18:13 season average over 81 games.Cole
Usage
Logan Cooley (UTA) played 13:55, −3:29 down on his 17:24 season average over 53 games.Cooley
Usage
Nick DeSimone (UTA) played 17:45, +3:38 up on his 14:07 season average over 39 games.DeSimone

Shot map

Both teams on one rink, filtered by strength and period.

Shot map

Every attempt, sized by expected goals. Goals are rings, shots on goal dots, misses hollow, blocks crosses.

Strength

Period

Team

← UTA attacks left (bottom on phones)PHI attacks right (top on phones) →

PHI
UTA
Goal
Shot on goal
Missed
Blocked

Showing 103 of 103 attempts · PHI 46 · UTA 57

Game flow

Cumulative expected goals and shot attempts, with power plays shaded and goals marked.

Cumulative shot attempts

PHI
UTA
Goal
Power play (shaded)

Pressure Index

PHI pressure
UTA pressure
Goal
Control (|PI| > 0.25)

: descriptive only, the team with more pressure scored the next goal about half the time. In control: UTA 27% of the game, PHI 19%.

Shift chart

Every shift, grouped by line and pair; bars are coloured by strength state. Click a player to highlight.

Shifts

PHI

UTA

goals / penalties

Even strength
Power play
Penalty kill
Goal
Penalty

Head-to-head matchups

PHI skaters (rows) against UTA skaters (columns) at 5v5. Square size is time together; colour is xGF% from the PHI side.

Matchup matrix

PHI xGF% 4060square size = TOI together · blank = under 1:00

Sequence card

5-on-5 possession-chain numbers from the sequence engine (Draw Equity and control cover all situations).

Sequence card
Stat	UTA	PHI
	56	46
	2.01	1.43
	1.93	1.31
	8	8
	5	2
	19	26
	+0.019	−0.019
	27%	19%

Definitions: sequence xG, transition attempts, Draw Equity, control and the Pressure Index.

Lines used

Detected from who actually shared the ice, with time together. Percentages are the unit's share of shot attempts.

Utah Mammoth

L1Schmaltz – Keller – Guenther
12:2760% CF
L2Crouse – Peterka – Cooley
10:5247% CF
L3Yamamoto – Hayton – McBain
9:4379% CF
L4Kerfoot – Stenlund – Carcone
8:3343% CF
D1Schmidt – Marino
15:2254% CF
D2Cole – Durzi
14:1471% CF
D3DeSimone – Simashev
11:2052% CF

PP1Schmaltz – Keller – Durzi – Hayton – Guenther
0:54100% CF
PK1FCrouse – Stenlund
1:30
PK2FKerfoot – Schmaltz
0:59
PK1DCole – Schmidt
2:22
PK2DDeSimone – Durzi
0:34

Current UTA line combinations →

Philadelphia Flyers

L1Dvorak – Tippett – Zegras
10:5058% CF
L2Cates – Brink – Michkov
8:3142% CF
L3Couturier – Grebenkin – Barkey
6:0947% CF
L4Deslauriers – Hathaway – Grundstrom
4:0520% CF
D1Ristolainen – Sanheim
17:4648% CF
D2York – Drysdale
15:4750% CF
D3Juulsen – Andrae
10:1332% CF

PP1Tippett – Zegras – Brink – Drysdale – Michkov
2:35100% CF
PP2Sanheim – Dvorak – Cates – York – Barkey
1:43
PK1FGrundstrom – Tippett
0:47
PK2FCouturier – Dvorak
0:08
PK1DRistolainen – Sanheim
0:47

Current PHI line combinations →

Scoring summary

Every goal with the skaters on the ice for it.

2nd period

1:38
UTANick SchmaltzPP (Dylan Guenther, Sean Durzi)snap0.12 xG
UTA: Schmaltz, Keller, Durzi, Hayton, GuentherPHI: Couturier, Sanheim, Dvorak, York
UTA 1 – 0 PHI
8:03
UTAClayton Keller (Dylan Guenther, Nick Schmaltz)backhand0.17 xG
UTA: Schmidt, Schmaltz, Marino, Keller, GuentherPHI: Ristolainen, Sanheim, Tippett, Cates, Michkov
UTA 2 – 0 PHI

3rd period

18:12
UTAMichael CarconeEN (Kevin Stenlund, John Marino)wrist0.94 xG
UTA: Kerfoot, Schmidt, Marino, Stenlund, CarconePHI: Couturier, Tippett, Zegras, Brink, Drysdale, Michkov
UTA 3 – 0 PHI

Box score

Skaters grouped by the line they played on; CF% is the 5v5 share of shot attempts while on the ice.

Utah Mammoth

UTA skaters
Skater	Line	G	A	P	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Nick Schmaltz C	L1	1	1	2	+1	2	0.14	0	2	0	19:34	—	—	56	62
Dylan Guenther R	L1	0	2	2	+1	0	0.12	2	0	0	16:30	—	—	54	57
Clayton Keller R	L1	1	0	1	+1	4	0.24	0	1	2	16:16	—	—	64	87
Lawson Crouse L	L2	0	0	0	0	2	0.03	2	0	0	14:25	—	—	50	42
Logan Cooley C	L2	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0	0	0	13:55	—	—	45	42
JJ Peterka R	L2	0	0	0	0	3	0.31	0	0	0	13:47	—	—	45	42
Jack McBain C	L3	0	0	0	0	2	0.08	5	0	0	14:08	—	—	68	49
Barrett Hayton C	L3	0	0	0	0	2	0.19	1	0	0	13:25	—	—	71	68
Kailer Yamamoto R	L3	0	0	0	0	2	0.21	2	1	0	13:04	—	—	70	66
Alexander Kerfoot C	L4	0	0	0	+1	0	0.35	2	0	0	14:21	—	—	42	67
Kevin Stenlund C	L4	0	1	1	+1	1	0.52	1	1	0	13:17	—	—	47	65
Michael Carcone L	L4	1	0	1	+1	2	1.11	0	1	0	12:07	—	—	41	64
John Marino D	D1	0	1	1	+2	0	0.20	0	1	2	22:40	—	—	50	67
Nate Schmidt D	D1	0	0	0	+2	2	0.06	0	3	0	22:12	—	—	54	63
Ian Cole D	D2	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	5	4	0	22:06	—	—	61	72
Sean Durzi D	D2	0	1	1	0	0	0.08	1	1	2	21:58	—	—	66	73
Nick DeSimone D	D3	0	0	0	0	1	0.14	0	3	0	17:45	—	—	47	42
Dmitri Simashev D	D3	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0	0	0	12:30	—	—	52	36

UTA goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
Vitek Vanecek(start)	W	16	16	0	.1000	1.61	60:00

Philadelphia Flyers

PHI skaters
Skater	Line	+/-			Hits	Blk	PIM		PP	SH
Trevor Zegras C	L1	-1	3	0.19	0	1	2	22:16	—	—	48	53
Owen Tippett R	L1	-2	2	0.08	2	1	0	21:03	—	—	50	60
Christian Dvorak C	L1	0	0	0.00	1	0	0	18:28	—	—	52	47
Bobby Brink R	L2	-1	1	0.10	1	0	0	19:19	—	—	48	16
Noah Cates L	L2	-1	1	0.29	4	0	2	18:18	—	—	38	31
Matvei Michkov R	L2	-2	0	0.03	0	0	0	16:43	—	—	40	7
Sean Couturier C	L3	-1	2	0.27	0	0	0	14:54	—	—	50	54
Nikita Grebenkin R	L3	0	0	0.07	4	1	0	12:27	—	—	39	40
Denver Barkey C	L3	0	3	0.14	2	3	0	12:06	—	—	39	37
Carl Grundstrom R	L4	0	2	0.35	3	2	0	12:09	—	—	53	56
Garnet Hathaway R	L4	0	0	0.00	2	0	0	9:57	—	—	43	58
Nicolas Deslauriers L	L4	0	0	0.00	2	0	0	5:21	—	—	17	0
Travis Sanheim D	D1	-1	0	0.00	2	2	0	24:24	—	—	53	27
Rasmus Ristolainen D	D1	-1	0	0.00	1	2	0	22:05	—	—	49	40
Jamie Drysdale D	D2	-1	1	0.05	0	2	0	22:48	—	—	52	75
Cam York D	D2	0	0	0.00	0	2	0	21:10	—	—	45	68
Emil Andrae D	D3	0	0	0.00	3	0	0	13:55	—	—	29	22
Noah Juulsen D	D3	0	1	0.03	2	1	0	12:41	—	—	33	21

PHI goalies
Goalie	Dec	SA	SV	GA			TOI
Dan Vladar(start)	L	22	20	2	.909	1.98	57:48

Goal anatomy

Animated replays from NHL EDGE tracking, with the entry, passes and shot speed for each goal.

Nick Schmaltz (UTA PP) 2nd 1:38 · assists Dylan Guenther, Sean Durzi · Forecheck turnover · 63.0 mph shot.

Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 1:38 · UTA PP

Play: turnover-forecheck
Passes: 0
Shot: 63.0 mph
Distance: 10 ft
Type: one-timer

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Clayton Keller · 2nd 8:03 · UTA

Play: rush
Entry: loose
Odd man: No
Passes: 1
Shot: 26.7 mph
Distance: 10 ft
Entry to goal: 3.0 s

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Michael Carcone · 3rd 18:12 · UTA EN

Play: dump-and-chase
Entry: dump
Odd man: 1-on-0
Passes: 0
Shot: 36.2 mph
Distance: 9 ft
Entry to goal: 3.1 s

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Methodology

Shot locations come from the NHL play-by-play, normalised so each shooter attacks the same way, then flipped so the home team attacks right. On-ice stats and lines come from the shift charts: a unit is the exact set of skaters sharing the ice, and CF% is the share of all shot attempts while they were out. Head-to-head cells are 5v5 time against each opponent. Expected goals and the Pressure Index appear as their models are released.