Edgehalla

Philadelphia Flyers vs. Utah MammothJan 21, 2026

Final / OT· Delta Center
Goals123OTTShots123OTT
PHI22004PHI14105029
UTA02215UTA7109127
PHI 60UTA 69
PHI 4.83UTA 2.98
PP goals
PHI 2UTA 1
Hits
PHI 25UTA 26
Blocks
PHI 18UTA 11
PIM
PHI 11UTA 15
PHI 57%UTA 43%

Fantasy takeaways

Generated from the play-by-play, shifts and season context. No opinions, just what changed.

Utah Mammoth edge Philadelphia Flyers 5–4 (OT)

Utah Mammoth beat Philadelphia Flyers 5–4 in overtime at home. Christian Dvorak (PHI) led the scoring with 2G 1A. PHI's first power-play unit (Dvorak, Konecny, Zegras, Brink and Drysdale) scored 2 power-play goals on 16 attempts in 6:05 together.

  1. Points
    Christian Dvorak had two goals and an assist (3 points) on 6 shots in 22:15.Dvorak
  2. Points
    Clayton Keller had two goals and an assist (3 points) on 5 shots in 19:19.Keller
  3. Points
    Dylan Guenther had a goal and an assist (2 points) on 4 shots in 19:13.Guenther
  4. Points
    Jamie Drysdale had 2 assists (2 points) on 2 shots in 22:36.Drysdale
  5. Points
    Nick Schmaltz had 2 assists (2 points) on 1 shot in 19:35.Schmaltz
  6. Points
    Trevor Zegras had 2 assists (2 points) on 2 shots in 20:43.Zegras
  7. PP1
    PHI's first power-play unit (Dvorak, Konecny, Zegras, Brink and Drysdale) scored 2 power-play goals on 16 attempts in 6:05 together.DvorakKonecnyZegrasBrinkDrysdale
  8. PP1
    UTA's first power-play unit (Schmaltz, Keller, Sergachev, Hayton and Guenther) scored 1 power-play goal on 3 attempts in 2:37 together.SchmaltzKellerSergachevHaytonGuenther

Shot map

Both teams on one rink, filtered by strength and period.

Shot map

Every attempt, sized by expected goals. Goals are rings, shots on goal dots, misses hollow, blocks crosses.

Shot map, PHI at UTA: 129 attempts, 56 on goal, 9 goals, 7.81 expected goals; best chance Bobby Brink at 0.54 xG.

Strength
Period
Team
← PHI attacks left (bottom on phones)UTA attacks right (top on phones) →
  • UTA
  • PHI
  • Goal
  • Shot on goal
  • Missed
  • Blocked

Showing 129 of 129 attempts · UTA 69 · PHI 60

Game flow

Cumulative expected goals and shot attempts, with power plays shaded and goals marked.

Cumulative shot attempts

Game flow, PHI at UTA: expected goals 2.98 to 4.83 (PHI led the chances), shot attempts 69 to 60, 9 goals.

0.01.02.03.04.05.01st2nd3rdOTUTAPHIYDBPCDGKKnet xGcumulative expected goals · 62:01
  • UTA
  • PHI
  • Goal
  • Power play (shaded)
Pressure Index
UTAPHIcontrol2nd3rdOTYork · 1st 0:30Dvorak · 1st 4:36Brink · 2nd 0:58Peterka · 2nd 5:35Crouse · 2nd 6:11Dvorak · 2nd 10:28Guenther · 3rd 12:47Keller · 3rd 19:25Keller · OT 2:01
  • UTA pressure
  • PHI pressure
  • Goal
  • Control (|PI| > 0.25)

: descriptive only, the team with more pressure scored the next goal about half the time. In control: PHI 36% of the game, UTA 31%.

Shift chart

Every shift, grouped by line and pair; bars are coloured by strength state. Click a player to highlight.

Shifts

Shift chart, PHI at UTA: 38 players over 62:01; most ice Karel Vejmelka (60:35) for UTA and Samuel Ersson (62:01) for PHI, 9 goals.

UTA
PHI
goals / penalties
  • Even strength
  • Power play
  • Penalty kill
  • Goal
  • Penalty

Head-to-head matchups

UTA skaters (rows) against PHI skaters (columns) at 5v5. Square size is time together; colour is xGF% from the UTA side.

Matchup matrix

Head-to-head matrix, UTA rows versus PHI columns: 251 matchups; most common Keller vs Sanheim, 7:35 at 9% xGF.

UTA ↓ · PHI →DvorakZegrasKonecnyBrinkCatesMichkovCouturierTippettBarkeyHathawayGrebenkinPedersonYorkSanheimSeelerJuulsenDrysdaleAndraeL1 CrouseL1 SchmaltzL1 KellerL2 GuentherL2 McBainL2 CarconeL3 HaytonL3 PeterkaL3 ButL4 StenlundL4 TanevL4 O'BrienD1 SchmidtD1 MarinoD2 SergachevD2 DurziD3 ColeD3 DeSimone
UTA xGF% 4060square size = TOI together · blank = under 1:00

Sequence card

5-on-5 possession-chain numbers from the sequence engine (Draw Equity and control cover all situations).

Sequence card
StatPHIUTA
4671
3.422.37
3.112.23
1611
76
1824
+0.051−0.051
36%31%

Definitions: sequence xG, transition attempts, Draw Equity, control and the Pressure Index.

Lines used

Detected from who actually shared the ice, with time together. Percentages are the unit's share of shot attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers

Current PHI line combinations →

Utah Mammoth

Current UTA line combinations →

Scoring summary

Every goal with the skaters on the ice for it.

1st period

  1. 0:30
    PHI 1 – 0 UTA
  2. 4:36
    PHI 2 – 0 UTA

2nd period

  1. 0:58
    PHI 3 – 0 UTA
  2. 5:35
    PHI 3 – 1 UTA
  3. 6:11
    PHI 3 – 2 UTA
  4. 10:28
    PHI 4 – 2 UTA

3rd period

  1. 12:47
    PHI 4 – 3 UTA
  2. 19:25
    PHI 4 – 4 UTA

OT period

  1. 2:01
    PHI 4 – 5 UTA

Box score

Skaters grouped by the line they played on; CF% is the 5v5 share of shot attempts while on the ice.

Philadelphia Flyers

PHI skaters
SkaterLineGAP+/-HitsBlkPIMPPSH
Christian Dvorak CL1213+161.1700022:15——3078
Trevor Zegras CL1022+220.2700020:43——4077
Travis Konecny RL1011010.2630019:06——3376
Bobby Brink RL2101-130.9801018:51——5257
Noah Cates LL2000-110.0300015:29——4636
Matvei Michkov RL2000-170.3610012:11——5252
Sean Couturier CL3000-230.1310017:50——4256
Owen Tippett RL3000-110.4201013:46——5274
Denver Barkey CL3000-110.4701012:49——3855
Garnet Hathaway RL4000000.0054012:19——2110
Nikita Grebenkin RL4000000.0520011:54——3212
Lane Pederson CL4000-100.006109:29——267
Cam York DD1101-110.3702026:48——3954
Travis Sanheim DD1011-110.0722023:37——4059
Nick Seeler DD2000+100.0022417:09——4058
Noah Juulsen DD2011+100.0230712:55——3559
Jamie Drysdale DD3022-220.2401022:36——3657
Emil Andrae DD3000-100.0003011:18——4668
PHI goalies
GoalieDecSASVGATOI
Samuel Ersson(start)O27225.8152.9862:01

Utah Mammoth

UTA skaters
SkaterLineGAP+/-HitsBlkPIMPPSH
Lawson Crouse LL1101+120.3041020:40——5931
Nick Schmaltz CL1022+110.1711219:35——6332
Clayton Keller RL1213+250.6401019:19——6132
Dylan Guenther RL2112+140.2411019:13——6829
Jack McBain CL2000+110.0941515:00——6739
Michael Carcone LL2000010.2720014:25——6841
Barrett Hayton CL3000010.0310216:51——5248
JJ Peterka RL3101+110.5510214:08——4771
Daniil But LL3011+100.0021011:26——4478
Kevin Stenlund CL4000-110.0410016:05——6733
Brandon Tanev LL4000030.282007:33——6045
Liam O'Brien CL4000000.064026:06——6452
Nate Schmidt DD1000-110.0520020:12——6530
John Marino DD1000-110.0410019:48——6123
Mikhail Sergachev DD2011+200.0203026:34——5746
Sean Durzi DD2000+200.0001020:13——5341
Ian Cole DD3000020.0601216:51——6455
Nick DeSimone DD3000030.1400013:39——7066
UTA goalies
GoalieDecSASVGATOI
Karel Vejmelka(start)W29254.8624.8360:35

Goal anatomy

Animated replays from NHL EDGE tracking, with the entry, passes and shot speed for each goal.

Cam York (PHI) 1st 0:30 · assists Christian Dvorak, Travis Sanheim · Rebound · 58.6 mph shot.

Cam York · 1st 0:30 · PHI

Play
rebound
Passes
0
Shot
58.6 mph
Distance
15 ft
Type
rebound

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Christian Dvorak · 1st 4:36 · PHI

Play
odd-man-rush
Entry
loose
Odd man
3-on-2
Passes
0
Shot
18.9 mph
Distance
1 ft
Entry to goal
2.4 s

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Christian Dvorak · 2nd 10:28 · PHI PP

Play
odd-man-rush
Entry
carry
Odd man
2-on-1
Passes
1
Shot
15.8 mph
Distance
26 ft
Entry to goal
2.9 s

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE

Clayton Keller · OT 2:01 · UTA

Play
odd-man-rush
Entry
carry
Odd man
2-on-1
Passes
1
Shot
66.1 mph
Distance
18 ft
Entry to goal
3.3 s

Watch on NHL.com → · Tracking-derived via NHL EDGE