2026 season · Week 5 · live
Over Expected: who beat expectations in Week 5
Every game’s biggest overperformer and letdown against our pregame projection, live on game days, then the week’s leaders in fantasy points over expected (FPOE): points beyond what a league-average player scores with the same targets, carries and throws. Big FPOE weeks rarely repeat; the usage behind them does.
LiveUpdated Sun, Oct 11, 6:15 PM ET· box scores refresh every 15 minutes; this page reloads itself while open. Live numbers compare points with the projection’s pace.
Game by game
- TB TB24@DAL DAL16Final · box scoreBeat expectations+18.9
Bucky IrvingTBRB31.5 pts · proj 12.6 · 99th-percentile game
2 touchdowns on 24 touches
- PHI PHI17@JAX JAX19Final · box scoreBeat expectations+17.2
Parker WashingtonJAXWR30.4 pts · proj 13.2 · 98th-percentile game
2 touchdowns on 9 touches
- CHI CHI7@GB GB31Final · box scoreBeat expectations+17.9
Christian WatsonGBWR32.3 pts · proj 14.4 · 98th-percentile game
2 touchdowns on 8 touches
Letdown−12.6
Tyson BagentCHIQB1.2 pts · proj 13.8 · 3rd-percentile game
2 interceptions (12/21, 87 yds, 2 INT)
- CIN CIN31@MIA MIA24Final · box scoreBeat expectations+9.6
Samaje PerineCINRB15.8 pts · proj 6.2 · 98th-percentile game
14 carries vs a projected 5
- LV LV17@NE NE45Final · box scoreBeat expectations+20.7
Drake MayeNEQB39.5 pts · proj 18.8 · 99th-percentile game
4 TD passes (26/34, 374 yds, 4 TD, 25 rush yds, 1 rush TD)
- MIN MIN23@NO NO13Final · box scoreBeat expectations+7.4
Gavin BartholomewMINTE8.3 pts · proj 0.9 · 99th-percentile game
6 targets vs a projected 1 — Addison out
- CLE CLE12@NYJ NYJ17Final · box scoreBeat expectations+8.2
Isaiah BondCLEWR10.4 pts · proj 2.2 · 99th-percentile game
7 targets vs a projected 1 — Concepcion left early
Letdown−8.0
KC ConcepcionCLEWR1.5 pts · proj 9.5 · 10th-percentile game
Left the game (Q1 4:59, did not return)
- IND IND22@PIT PIT34Final · box scoreBeat expectations+16.7
Jaylen WarrenPITRB36.8 pts · proj 20.1 · 95th-percentile game
2 touchdowns on 21 touches
- HOU HOU26@TEN TEN3Final · box scoreBeat expectations+10.9
Jaylin NoelHOUWR15.2 pts · proj 4.3 · 99th-percentile game
5 for 41, 1 TD on 5 targets; 1 carry for 1
Letdown−10.8
David MontgomeryHOURB1.1 pts · proj 11.9 · 7th-percentile game
5 carries vs a projected 15
- NYG NYG27@WAS WAS27Final · box scoreBeat expectations+21.6
Isaiah LikelyNYGTE32.4 pts · proj 10.8 · 99th-percentile game
13 targets vs a projected 7
Letdown−10.2
Rachaad WhiteWASRB3.0 pts · proj 13.2 · 9th-percentile game
7 carries for 18; 1 for 2 on 1 target
- DEN DEN10@LAC LAC101:15 - 3rdBeat expectationsvs pace +7.4
Hayden RucciLACTE7.7 pts · proj 0.4 · pace 0.3
1 for 7, 1 TD on 1 target
- DET DET24@ARI ARI714:20 - 3rdBeat expectationsvs pace +8.5
Sam LaPortaDETTE15.1 pts · proj 13.0 · pace 6.6
3 for 61, 1 TD on 3 targets
- SF SF21@SEA SEA1315:00 - 3rdBeat expectationsvs pace +6.5
Mike EvansSFWR12.8 pts · proj 12.7 · pace 6.3
3 for 38, 1 TD on 5 targets
- BAL BAL@ATL ATLSun 8:20 PM ET
Not started.
- BUF BUF@LAR LARMon 8:15 PM ET
Not started.
Live and same-day numbers use ESPN box scores; official nflverse stats and FPOE replace them the morning after.
Week 5 leaderboard
Fantasy points minus our last projection before kickoff. The top and bottom of the list are shown; sort any column.
| Why | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.4 | 10.8 | +21.6 | 13 targets vs a projected 7 | |
| 39.5 | 18.8 | +20.7 | 4 TD passes (26/34, 374 yds, 4 TD, 25 rush yds, 1 rush TD) | |
| 31.5 | 12.6 | +18.9 | 2 touchdowns on 24 touches | |
| 32.3 | 14.4 | +17.9 | 2 touchdowns on 8 touches | |
| 29.1 | 11.5 | +17.6 | 20 targets vs a projected 7 | |
| 30.4 | 13.2 | +17.2 | 2 touchdowns on 9 touches | |
| 36.8 | 20.1 | +16.7 | 2 touchdowns on 21 touches | |
| 18.1 | 4.0 | +14.1 | 3 for 91, 1 TD on 3 targets | |
| 21.5 | 7.5 | +14.0 | 2 touchdowns on 8 touches | |
| 22.5 | 8.6 | +13.9 | 2 touchdowns on 5 touches | |
| 28.0 | 14.3 | +13.8 | 13 targets vs a projected 7 | |
| 30.3 | 16.6 | +13.7 | 9 carries vs a projected 4 | |
| 25.7 | 12.2 | +13.6 | 54 pass attempts vs a projected 30 | |
| 15.2 | 4.3 | +10.9 | 5 for 41, 1 TD on 5 targets; 1 carry for 1 | |
| 11.5 | 0.6 | +10.9 | 4 carries for 9, 1 TD; 3 for 16 on 3 targets | |
| 21.4 | 11.6 | +9.8 | 7 for 83 on 9 targets; 1 carry for 1, 1 TD | |
| 15.8 | 6.2 | +9.6 | 14 carries vs a projected 5 | |
| 14.4 | 5.0 | +9.3 | 9 targets vs a projected 3 — Pittman out | |
| 15.1 | 5.8 | +9.3 | 2 for 71, 1 TD on 3 targets | |
| 15.1 | 13.0pace 6.6 | +8.5 | 3 for 61, 1 TD on 3 targets | |
| 1.5 | 9.5 | −8.0 | Left the game (Q1 4:59, did not return) | |
| 3.5 | 16.0pace 11.7 | −8.2 | 18 pass attempts vs a projected 33 | |
| 7.7 | 15.9 | −8.2 | 6 targets vs a projected 10 | |
| 12.6 | 21.0 | −8.3 | 0 carries vs a projected 3 | |
| 0.0 | 8.4 | −8.4 | 0 for 0 on 3 targets | |
| 2.6 | 11.4 | −8.8 | 3 carries vs a projected 11 | |
| 0.6 | 13.3pace 9.7 | −9.1 | 2 carries vs a projected 10 | |
| 0.0 | 9.1 | −9.1 | 1 target vs a projected 6 | |
| 1.6 | 10.8 | −9.2 | 1 for 6 on 5 targets | |
| 8.6 | 18.2 | −9.6 | 6 targets vs a projected 11 | |
| 3.0 | 13.2 | −10.2 | 7 carries for 18; 1 for 2 on 1 target | |
| 1.1 | 11.9 | −10.8 | 5 carries vs a projected 15 | |
| 5.3 | 16.8 | −11.5 | 4 targets vs a projected 10 | |
| 1.7 | 13.7 | −12.0 | Left the game (Q1 14:22, did not return) | |
| 1.2 | 13.8 | −12.6 | 2 interceptions (12/21, 87 yds, 2 INT) | |
| 7.0 | 19.7 | −12.7 | Lost a fumble (13 carries for 39; 3 for 21 on 4 targets) | |
| 4.2 | 17.3 | −13.1 | 4 targets vs a projected 9 | |
| 2.6 | 16.8 | −14.2 | 3 targets vs a projected 9 | |
| -0.2 | 15.2 | −15.3 | 0 carries vs a projected 4 | |
| 2.9 | 20.4 | −17.4 | 5 targets vs a projected 10 |
Team defenses vs projection
Season-long scoring (DraftKings alongside). Points allowed leave out the opponent’s own return touchdowns and safeties, as ESPN and Yahoo score them.
| Defense | Pts | Proj | vs proj | DK | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSF D/ST vs SEAlive | 19.0 | 4.1(-1–9) | +14.9 | 20.0 | 4 sk · 1 INT · 2 FR · 1 TD · 13 PA |
| GBGB D/ST vs CHIprelim | 17.0 | 4.8(0–10) | +12.2 | 18.0 | 4 sk · 3 INT · 2 FR · 7 PA |
| NYJNYJ D/ST vs CLEprelim | 15.0 | 6.1(2–11) | +8.9 | 16.0 | 8 sk · 0 INT · 2 FR · 12 PA |
| NONO D/ST vs MINprelim | 12.0 | 5.9(1–11) | +6.1 | 12.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 2 FR · 1 TD · 23 PA |
| HOUHOU D/ST vs TENprelim | 12.0 | 7.0(3–12) | +5.0 | 15.0 | 4 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 3 PA |
| CLECLE D/ST vs NYJprelim | 9.0 | 5.8(1–11) | +3.2 | 9.0 | 4 sk · 0 INT · 2 FR · 17 PA |
| TBTB D/ST vs DAL | 7.0 | 3.9(-1–9) | +3.1 | 7.0 | 0 sk · 2 INT · 1 FR · 16 PA |
| MINMIN D/ST vs NOprelim | 10.0 | 7.3(2–13) | +2.7 | 11.0 | 1 sk · 2 INT · 1 FR · 7 PA |
| CINCIN D/ST vs MIAprelim | 9.0 | 6.3(2–11) | +2.7 | 9.0 | 3 sk · 2 INT · 1 FR · 24 PA |
| DETDET D/ST vs ARIlive | 8.0 | 5.8(1–11) | +2.2 | 9.0 | 3 sk · 1 INT · 0 FR · 7 PA |
| SEASEA D/ST vs SFlive | 6.0 | 5.4(1–11) | +0.6 | 6.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 15 PA |
| NENE D/ST vs LVprelim | 6.0 | 6.0(1–11) | 0.0 | 6.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 17 PA |
| WASWAS D/ST vs NYGprelim | 6.0 | 6.4(2–12) | −0.4 | 6.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 2 FR · 27 PA |
| NYGNYG D/ST vs WASprelim | 5.0 | 5.4(1–11) | −0.4 | 5.0 | 5 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 27 PA |
| PHIPHI D/ST vs JAXprelim | 4.0 | 4.7(0–10) | −0.7 | 5.0 | 2 sk · 1 INT · 0 FR · 19 PA |
| ARIARI D/ST vs DETlive | 3.0 | 3.8(-1–9) | −0.8 | 3.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 24 PA |
| DENDEN D/ST vs LAClive | 6.0 | 7.1(2–12) | −1.1 | 7.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 10 PA |
| LACLAC D/ST vs DENlive | 4.0 | 5.7(1–11) | −1.7 | 5.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 10 PA |
| TENTEN D/ST vs HOUprelim | 2.0 | 4.6(0–9) | −2.6 | 2.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 26 PA |
| MIAMIA D/ST vs CINprelim | 1.0 | 4.8(0–10) | −3.8 | 1.0 | 0 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 31 PA |
| CHICHI D/ST vs GBprelim | 1.0 | 5.6(1–11) | −4.6 | 1.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 31 PA |
| JAXJAX D/ST vs PHIprelim | 2.0 | 7.3(2–13) | −5.2 | 2.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 17 PA |
| INDIND D/ST vs PITprelim | 0.0 | 5.2(1–10) | −5.2 | 0.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 34 PA |
| DALDAL D/ST vs TB | 1.0 | 6.3(2–11) | −5.3 | 1.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 24 PA |
| PITPIT D/ST vs INDprelim | 1.0 | 6.6(2–12) | −5.6 | 1.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 22 PA |
| LVLV D/ST vs NEprelim | 0.0 | 6.4(1–12) | −6.4 | -1.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 45 PA |
2026 season: over and under expected
Through Week 4, games with play-by-play only.
Scoring the most above what their usage usually produces (3+ games). History says about a quarter of that edge carries forward: sell-high candidates.
| 3 | 22.4 | 12.2 | +10.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 29.2 | 19.6 | +9.6 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 25.1 | 15.9 | +9.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 26.4 | 19.2 | +7.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 28.1 | 21.2 | +6.9 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 28.1 | 21.4 | +6.6 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 14.5 | 8.6 | +5.8 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.8 | 14.0 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 16.1 | 10.4 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 20.9 | 15.2 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.8 | 14.4 | +5.3 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 27.5 | 22.6 | +4.9 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 12.1 | 7.3 | +4.8 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 13.2 | 8.6 | +4.5 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 15.0 | 10.4 | +4.5 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 22.4 | 18.0 | +4.4 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 14.8 | 10.6 | +4.3 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 14.3 | 10.2 | +4.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 29.0 | 24.8 | +4.2 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 8.1 | 4.0 | +4.1 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 11.2 | 7.2 | +4.1 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 22.7 | 18.8 | +4.0 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.3 | 15.3 | +4.0 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 12.7 | 8.9 | +3.7 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 17.4 | 13.8 | +3.6 | Sell high |
Next: Ascension (rising usage) · Waiver wire · Projections
How this works
vs projection compares his fantasy points with the last projection we published before his game kicked off (mean, with the 10th–90th percentile range). While a game is on, the projection is scaled by the share of the game played, by quarter and clock.
Expected points (xFP) come from our own play-level model fitted on 2023–25 play-by-play: each target is valued by its air yards, field position and down, each carry by field position, down and whether it was a scramble, each pass attempt by air yards and field position. On 2024–25 games it was not fitted on, xFP averaged within 1–6% of actual points at every position and correlated 0.98 with ffopportunity’s public model.
FPOE = points − xFP. Across 2023–25 it barely carried from one week to the next (r = 0.05) while expected points did (r = 0.34): treat a big FPOE as regression risk, and big usage with a negative FPOE as a buy-low.
Sources: nflverse play-by-play and weekly stats, ESPN box scores (live)Updated Sun, Oct 11, 6:15 PM ET
Frequently asked questions
What does “over expected” mean here?
Two things. Versus projection: his fantasy points minus our pregame projection (the last one made before his game kicked off). Versus opportunity, or FPOE: his points minus what a league-average player scores with the same targets, carries and pass attempts from the same spots on the field (expected fantasy points, xFP).
Should I chase a big FPOE week?
Usually not. Across 2023–25 a player’s FPOE one week had almost no relationship with the next (correlation 0.05), and only about a quarter of a half-season’s FPOE carried into the second half. A big positive FPOE is a sell-high signal; a big negative FPOE with heavy usage is a buy-low. Expected points from usage hold up far better (week-to-week correlation 0.34).
What is the “pace” number during games?
While a game is on, his projection is scaled by how much of the game has been played (by quarter and clock), so a receiver with 12 points at halftime is compared with half of his projection. It is a rough guide: usage is not spread evenly across a game. Final numbers replace it after the game.
When do the final numbers land?
Live numbers come from box scores every 15 minutes during games. Expected points need play-by-play, which nflverse publishes the morning after; FPOE and the final leaderboard update then (Monday night games on Tuesday).