2026 season · Week 4
Over Expected: who beat expectations in Week 4
Every game’s biggest overperformer and letdown against our pregame projection, live on game days, then the week’s leaders in fantasy points over expected (FPOE): points beyond what a league-average player scores with the same targets, carries and throws. Big FPOE weeks rarely repeat; the usage behind them does.
Updated Sun, Oct 11, 9:45 AM ET
Game by game
- PIT PIT24@CLE CLE27FinalBeat expectations+12.2
Quinshon JudkinsCLERB21.6 pts · proj 9.4 · 99th-percentile game
7 targets vs a projected 2
- IND IND30@WAS WAS13FinalBeat expectations+6.7
Laquon TreadwellINDWR9.2 pts · proj 2.5 · 99th-percentile game
6 targets vs a projected 1 — Allen out
- TEN TEN18@BAL BAL24FinalBeat expectations+11.3
Carnell TateTENWR21.5 pts · proj 10.2 · 97th-percentile game
12 targets vs a projected 7
- NE NE29@BUF BUF26FinalBeat expectations+15.4
Keon ColemanBUFWR23.6 pts · proj 8.2 · 99th-percentile game
6 catches for 116 yards on 7 targets
Letdown−9.3
DJ MooreBUFWR2.7 pts · proj 12.0 · 11th-percentile game
Played 39% of snaps (projected 71%)
- NYJ NYJ12@CHI CHI23FinalBeat expectations+19.2
Kyle MonangaiCHIRB28.0 pts · proj 8.8 · 99th-percentile game
30 carries vs a projected 9
Letdown−16.4
Case KeenumCHIQB0.0 pts · proj 16.4 · 1st-percentile game
Played 1% of snaps (projected 98%)
- JAX JAX22@CIN CIN17FinalBeat expectations+11.2
Dohnte MeyersCINWR15.2 pts · proj 4.0 · 99th-percentile game
9 targets vs a projected 2 — Chase left early
Letdown−14.9
Ja'Marr ChaseCINWR5.7 pts · proj 20.6 · 9th-percentile game
Played 20% of snaps (projected 92%)
- DAL DAL34@HOU HOU30FinalBeat expectations+25.2
CeeDee LambDALWR41.3 pts · proj 16.1 · 99th-percentile game
21 targets vs a projected 8
Letdown−9.4
David MontgomeryHOURB4.3 pts · proj 13.7 · 12th-percentile game
No touchdown on 10 touches (10 carries for 24)
- ARI ARI24@NYG NYG36FinalBeat expectations+14.0
Malik NabersNYGWR23.2 pts · proj 9.2 · 99th-percentile game
6 catches for 112 yards on 7 targets
- LAR LAR24@PHI PHI20FinalBeat expectations+20.2
Kyren WilliamsLARRB36.7 pts · proj 16.5 · 99th-percentile game
13 targets vs a projected 3
- GB GB17@TB TB14FinalBeat expectations+8.6
Tucker KraftGBTE16.5 pts · proj 7.9 · 93rd-percentile game
6 for 42, 1 TD on 7 targets; 1 carry for 3
- MIA MIA10@MIN MIN15FinalBeat expectations+15.6
T.J. HockensonMINTE24.9 pts · proj 9.3 · 99th-percentile game
13 targets vs a projected 5
Letdown−7.2
Malik WillisMIAQB2.5 pts · proj 9.7 · 8th-percentile game
17 pass attempts vs a projected 29
- KC KC30@LV LV27FinalBeat expectations+23.1
Tyquan ThorntonKCWR28.1 pts · proj 5.0 · 99th-percentile game
8 targets vs a projected 3 — Rice left early
Letdown−14.3
Rashee RiceKCWR0.0 pts · proj 14.3 · 5th-percentile game
Played 10% of snaps (projected 81%)
- LAC LAC23@SEA SEA30FinalBeat expectations+16.8
Emanuel WilsonSEARB27.0 pts · proj 10.2 · 99th-percentile game
2 touchdowns on 25 touches
- DEN DEN14@SF SF24FinalBeat expectations+7.4
RJ HarveyDENRB19.3 pts · proj 11.9 · 85th-percentile game
10 targets vs a projected 4
- DET DET26@CAR CAR32FinalBeat expectations+28.2
Tetairoa McMillanCARWR45.2 pts · proj 17.0 · 99th-percentile game
16 targets vs a projected 10 — Coker out
- ATL ATL45@NO NO24FinalBeat expectations+19.3
Brian RobinsonATLRB25.7 pts · proj 6.4 · 99th-percentile game
14 carries vs a projected 8
Projections for weeks before kickoff snapshots began are the same model run as of that week from earlier games only (no live injury or depth inputs).
Week 4 leaderboard
Fantasy points minus our last projection before kickoff. The top and bottom of the list are shown; sort any column.
| Why | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.2 | 17.0 | +28.2 | 16 targets vs a projected 10 — Coker out | |
| 41.3 | 16.1 | +25.2 | 21 targets vs a projected 8 | |
| 28.1 | 5.0 | +23.1 | 8 targets vs a projected 3 — Rice left early | |
| 36.7 | 16.5 | +20.2 | 13 targets vs a projected 3 | |
| 25.7 | 6.4 | +19.3 | 14 carries vs a projected 8 | |
| 28.0 | 8.8 | +19.2 | 30 carries vs a projected 9 | |
| 27.0 | 10.2 | +16.8 | 2 touchdowns on 25 touches | |
| 31.3 | 15.6 | +15.7 | 3 touchdowns on 24 touches | |
| 30.8 | 15.2 | +15.6 | 2 touchdowns on 8 touches | |
| 24.9 | 9.3 | +15.6 | 13 targets vs a projected 5 | |
| 23.6 | 8.2 | +15.4 | 6 catches for 116 yards on 7 targets | |
| 18.0 | 2.7 | +15.3 | 9 carries vs a projected 5 — Achane out | |
| 18.3 | 3.1 | +15.2 | 7 targets vs a projected 2 | |
| 22.8 | 7.6 | +15.2 | 7 targets vs a projected 3 — Etienne out | |
| 23.8 | 9.6 | +14.2 | 2 touchdowns on 9 touches | |
| 23.2 | 9.2 | +14.0 | 6 catches for 112 yards on 7 targets | |
| 21.6 | 9.4 | +12.2 | 7 targets vs a projected 2 | |
| 21.5 | 10.2 | +11.3 | 12 targets vs a projected 7 | |
| 15.2 | 4.0 | +11.2 | 9 targets vs a projected 2 — Chase left early | |
| 26.2 | 15.4 | +10.7 | 3 TD passes (22/37, 269 yds, 3 TD, 1 INT, 54 rush yds) | |
| 2.6 | 11.1 | −8.5 | 2 targets vs a projected 6 | |
| 7.9 | 16.5 | −8.6 | 19/34, 143 yds, 1 INT, 2 rush yds, 1 rush TD | |
| 17.7 | 26.5 | −8.8 | 15 carries for 46, 1 TD; 4 for 31 on 7 targets | |
| 2.9 | 11.8 | −8.9 | 2 targets vs a projected 6 | |
| 0.0 | 9.0 | −9.0 | Played 34% of snaps (projected 71%) | |
| 2.7 | 12.0 | −9.3 | Played 39% of snaps (projected 71%) | |
| 4.3 | 13.7 | −9.4 | No touchdown on 10 touches (10 carries for 24) | |
| 5.0 | 14.4 | −9.4 | Played 27% of snaps (projected 63%) | |
| 1.4 | 11.1 | −9.7 | 1 catch on 6 targets | |
| 4.8 | 14.6 | −9.8 | 5 targets vs a projected 8 | |
| 5.3 | 15.2 | −9.9 | Played 16% of snaps (projected 56%) | |
| 12.6 | 22.9 | −10.3 | 6 targets vs a projected 11 | |
| 2.0 | 12.7 | −10.7 | Played 7% of snaps (projected 65%) | |
| 7.2 | 18.2 | −11.0 | 4 for 32 on 9 targets | |
| 4.6 | 15.6 | −11.0 | 4 targets vs a projected 9 | |
| 5.7 | 18.8 | −13.1 | 4 targets vs a projected 11 | |
| 2.0 | 15.6 | −13.6 | 3 targets vs a projected 8 | |
| 0.0 | 14.3 | −14.3 | Played 10% of snaps (projected 81%) | |
| 5.7 | 20.6 | −14.9 | Played 20% of snaps (projected 92%) | |
| 0.0 | 16.4 | −16.4 | Played 1% of snaps (projected 98%) |
Team defenses vs projection
Season-long scoring (DraftKings alongside). Points allowed leave out the opponent’s own return touchdowns and safeties, as ESPN and Yahoo score them.
| Defense | Pts | Proj | vs proj | DK | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYGNYG D/ST vs ARI | 14.0 | 5.0(0–10) | +9.0 | 14.0 | 2 sk · 3 INT · 0 FR · 1 TD · 24 PA |
| SEASEA D/ST vs LAC | 12.0 | 7.5(2–13) | +4.5 | 12.0 | 4 sk · 2 INT · 2 FR · 23 PA |
| ARIARI D/ST vs NYG | 9.0 | 5.4(1–10) | +3.6 | 9.0 | 4 sk · 2 INT · 1 FR · 30 PA |
| CLECLE D/ST vs PIT | 9.0 | 5.6(1–11) | +3.4 | 9.0 | 5 sk · 2 INT · 0 FR · 24 PA |
| INDIND D/ST vs WAS | 7.0 | 4.8(1–9) | +2.2 | 8.0 | 2 sk · 1 INT · 0 FR · 13 PA |
| JAXJAX D/ST vs CIN | 7.0 | 5.1(0–11) | +1.9 | 7.0 | 2 sk · 2 INT · 0 FR · 17 PA |
| GBGB D/ST vs TB | 8.0 | 6.8(2–12) | +1.3 | 8.0 | 3 sk · 2 INT · 0 FR · 14 PA |
| NYJNYJ D/ST vs CHI | 5.0 | 4.4(0–9) | +0.6 | 5.0 | 1 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 23 PA |
| NENE D/ST vs BUF | 5.0 | 4.7(0–10) | +0.3 | 5.0 | 1 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 26 PA |
| PHIPHI D/ST vs LAR | 5.0 | 5.0(0–10) | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1 sk · 2 INT · 0 FR · 24 PA |
| MIAMIA D/ST vs MIN | 5.0 | 5.2(0–11) | −0.2 | 5.0 | 4 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 15 PA |
| WASWAS D/ST vs IND | 5.0 | 5.2(0–11) | −0.2 | 5.0 | 2 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 30 PA |
| CHICHI D/ST vs NYJ | 6.0 | 6.4(2–11) | −0.4 | 7.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 12 PA |
| TBTB D/ST vs GB | 5.0 | 5.5(1–11) | −0.5 | 5.0 | 0 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 17 PA |
| PITPIT D/ST vs CLE | 6.0 | 7.0(2–12) | −1.0 | 6.0 | 2 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 27 PA |
| CINCIN D/ST vs JAX | 4.0 | 5.2(0–10) | −1.2 | 4.0 | 4 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 22 PA |
| MINMIN D/ST vs MIA | 7.0 | 8.3(3–14) | −1.3 | 8.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 10 PA |
| LACLAC D/ST vs SEA | 4.0 | 5.3(0–11) | −1.3 | 4.0 | 3 sk · 1 INT · 0 FR · 30 PA |
| ATLATL D/ST vs NO | 4.0 | 5.4(1–11) | −1.4 | 4.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 24 PA |
| HOUHOU D/ST vs DAL | 4.0 | 5.6(1–11) | −1.6 | 4.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 1 BLK · 34 PA |
| BALBAL D/ST vs TEN | 5.0 | 6.8(2–11) | −1.7 | 6.0 | 1 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 18 PA |
| TENTEN D/ST vs BAL | 2.0 | 3.9(-1–9) | −1.9 | 2.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 24 PA |
| SFSF D/ST vs DEN | 3.0 | 5.0(0–10) | −2.0 | 3.0 | 0 sk · 0 INT · 1 FR · 14 PA |
| KCKC D/ST vs LV | 4.0 | 6.1(1–12) | −2.1 | 4.0 | 0 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 27 PA |
| LARLAR D/ST vs PHI | 4.0 | 6.5(2–12) | −2.5 | 5.0 | 4 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 20 PA |
| DENDEN D/ST vs SF | 2.0 | 4.5(0–10) | −2.5 | 2.0 | 0 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 1 BLK · 24 PA |
| BUFBUF D/ST vs NE | 4.0 | 6.8(2–12) | −2.7 | 4.0 | 1 sk · 1 INT · 1 FR · 29 PA |
| DALDAL D/ST vs HOU | 1.0 | 4.0(0–9) | −3.0 | 1.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 30 PA |
| CARCAR D/ST vs DET | 1.0 | 4.6(0–10) | −3.6 | 1.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 26 PA |
| DETDET D/ST vs CAR | 2.0 | 6.1(1–11) | −4.1 | 2.0 | 3 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 32 PA |
| LVLV D/ST vs KC | 1.0 | 5.6(0–11) | −4.6 | 1.0 | 2 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 30 PA |
| NONO D/ST vs ATL | -2.0 | 5.8(1–11) | −7.8 | -3.0 | 1 sk · 0 INT · 0 FR · 45 PA |
2026 season: over and under expected
Through Week 4, games with play-by-play only.
Scoring the most above what their usage usually produces (3+ games). History says about a quarter of that edge carries forward: sell-high candidates.
| 3 | 22.4 | 12.2 | +10.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 29.2 | 19.6 | +9.6 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 25.1 | 15.9 | +9.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 26.4 | 19.2 | +7.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 28.1 | 21.2 | +6.9 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 28.1 | 21.4 | +6.6 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 14.5 | 8.6 | +5.8 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.8 | 14.0 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 16.1 | 10.4 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 20.9 | 15.2 | +5.7 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.8 | 14.4 | +5.3 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 27.5 | 22.6 | +4.9 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 12.1 | 7.3 | +4.8 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 13.2 | 8.6 | +4.5 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 15.0 | 10.4 | +4.5 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 22.4 | 18.0 | +4.4 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 14.8 | 10.6 | +4.3 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 14.3 | 10.2 | +4.2 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 29.0 | 24.8 | +4.2 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 8.1 | 4.0 | +4.1 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 11.2 | 7.2 | +4.1 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 22.7 | 18.8 | +4.0 | Sell high | |
| 4 | 19.3 | 15.3 | +4.0 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 12.7 | 8.9 | +3.7 | Sell high | |
| 3 | 17.4 | 13.8 | +3.6 | Sell high |
Next: Ascension (rising usage) · Waiver wire · Projections
How this works
vs projection compares his fantasy points with the last projection we published before his game kicked off (mean, with the 10th–90th percentile range). While a game is on, the projection is scaled by the share of the game played, by quarter and clock.
Expected points (xFP) come from our own play-level model fitted on 2023–25 play-by-play: each target is valued by its air yards, field position and down, each carry by field position, down and whether it was a scramble, each pass attempt by air yards and field position. On 2024–25 games it was not fitted on, xFP averaged within 1–6% of actual points at every position and correlated 0.98 with ffopportunity’s public model.
FPOE = points − xFP. Across 2023–25 it barely carried from one week to the next (r = 0.05) while expected points did (r = 0.34): treat a big FPOE as regression risk, and big usage with a negative FPOE as a buy-low.
Sources: nflverse play-by-play and weekly stats, ESPN box scores (live)Updated Sun, Oct 11, 9:45 AM ET
Frequently asked questions
What does “over expected” mean here?
Two things. Versus projection: his fantasy points minus our pregame projection (the last one made before his game kicked off). Versus opportunity, or FPOE: his points minus what a league-average player scores with the same targets, carries and pass attempts from the same spots on the field (expected fantasy points, xFP).
Should I chase a big FPOE week?
Usually not. Across 2023–25 a player’s FPOE one week had almost no relationship with the next (correlation 0.05), and only about a quarter of a half-season’s FPOE carried into the second half. A big positive FPOE is a sell-high signal; a big negative FPOE with heavy usage is a buy-low. Expected points from usage hold up far better (week-to-week correlation 0.34).
What is the “pace” number during games?
While a game is on, his projection is scaled by how much of the game has been played (by quarter and clock), so a receiver with 12 points at halftime is compared with half of his projection. It is a rough guide: usage is not spread evenly across a game. Final numbers replace it after the game.
When do the final numbers land?
Live numbers come from box scores every 15 minutes during games. Expected points need play-by-play, which nflverse publishes the morning after; FPOE and the final leaderboard update then (Monday night games on Tuesday).