Draw Duel
Tanner Laczynski faceoff stats, 2025-26
VGK · C · Right shot · full player page
Model rating
42.9%
90%: 37.5%–48.5% vs an average regular, on 115 draws since 2023-24
2025-26 FO%
48.7%
38 won of 78 (regular season)
Strong / weak side
58.3% / 40.0%
36 strong-side, 25 weak-side draws this season
Next game
No projection scheduled.
Where Laczynski wins draws
Win % at every dot, 2025-26 and 2024-25 regular season, in his own attacking direction.
Show as a table
| Dot | Draws | Won | FO% |
|---|---|---|---|
| OZ left | 9 | 4 | 44.4% |
| OZ right | 23 | 10 | 43.5% |
| NZ left (att.) | 5 | 2 | 40.0% |
| NZ right (att.) | 9 | 8 | 88.9% |
| Centre | 25 | 10 | 40.0% |
| NZ left (def.) | 7 | 1 | 14.3% |
| NZ right (def.) | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| DZ left | 14 | 7 | 50.0% |
| DZ right | 21 | 10 | 47.6% |
Toughest and easiest opponents
Model win % against today's regular centres, averaged over home and road and every dot. This is a prediction, not his record.
Toughest
- Claude Giroux OTT · R35.0%
- Aatu Räty VAN · L35.0%
- Jean-Gabriel Pageau NYI · R35.8%
- J.T. Miller NYR · L36.0%
- Auston Matthews TOR · L36.2%
- Jack Drury NSH · L36.3%
Easiest
- Jack Hughes NJD · L56.0%
- Noah Ostlund BUF · L55.6%
- Trevor Zegras PHI · L54.5%
- Danila Yurov MIN · L52.8%
- Pavel Buchnevich STL · L52.5%
- Calum Ritchie NYI · R52.2%
Splits by season
| Season | All | EV | PP | PK | OZ | NZ | DZ | Strong | Weak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 48.7% 78 | 46.5% 71 | 66.7% 6 | 100.0% 1 | 45.5% 22 | 51.7% 29 | 48.1% 27 | 58.3% 36 | 40.0% 25 |
| 2024-25 | 43.2% 37 | 43.2% 37 | — 0 | — 0 | 40.0% 10 | 42.1% 19 | 50.0% 8 | 47.4% 19 | 40.0% 10 |
Small numbers are draws taken. Strong = his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots, in his own attacking direction); centre-ice draws count in neither.
Head-to-head, last three seasons
Raw records against his most frequent opponents next to what the model expected at the dots they actually met at. The blended number moves the model toward the record by n / (n + 500), because pair-specific edges are tiny (about ±2 points) and most of a lopsided record is luck.
| Opponent | Record | Raw | Model | Blended | Unusual? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Laughton | 5–2 | 71.4% | 38.8% | 39.3% | a bit unusual (z 1.8) |
| Radek Faksa | 5–2 | 71.4% | 40.4% | 40.8% | a bit unusual (z 1.7) |
| Lars Eller | 3–3 | 50.0% | 41.0% | 41.1% | normal luck (z 0.5) |
| Alex Laferriere | 2–3 | 40.0% | 47.1% | 47.0% | normal luck (z -0.3) |
| Fedor Svechkov | 2–3 | 40.0% | 51.2% | 51.0% | normal luck (z -0.5) |
| Elias Lindholm | 3–2 | 60.0% | 36.0% | 36.2% | a bit unusual (z 1.1) |
| Yanni Gourde | 1–4 | 20.0% | 46.1% | 45.8% | a bit unusual (z -1.2) |
| Oskar Sundqvist | 1–4 | 20.0% | 45.7% | 45.4% | a bit unusual (z -1.2) |
| Tim Stützle | 3–1 | 75.0% | 44.0% | 44.2% | a bit unusual (z 1.3) |
| Fraser Minten | 2–2 | 50.0% | 46.0% | 46.0% | normal luck (z 0.2) |
| Ty Dellandrea | 1–3 | 25.0% | 42.5% | 42.3% | normal luck (z -0.7) |
| Matty Beniers | 1–3 | 25.0% | 47.7% | 47.5% | normal luck (z -0.9) |
Last 10 games
| Date | Opp | FOW | Draws | FO% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-25 | @ LAK | 4 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-01 | @ ANA | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | vs DAL | 5 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-27 | @ MTL | 2 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-25 | @ OTT | 7 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-23 | @ TOR | 4 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-22 | @ BOS | 6 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-19 | vs PHI | 1 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | vs NSH | 3 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-15 | vs TOR | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
Projected faceoffs won
No upcoming games projected.
FAQ
What is Tanner Laczynski's faceoff percentage?
The season line above shows Tanner Laczynski's raw faceoff wins and percentage this season. The model rating beside it is his expected win rate against an average regular centre at a neutral dot, adjusted for opponents, home ice and dot side, with a 90% interval.
How many faceoffs will Tanner Laczynski win tonight?
When Tanner Laczynski has a game scheduled, the projection above gives expected draws, expected win rate against tonight's likely opposing centres, and a 10th–90th percentile range of faceoffs won. Projections update nightly.
Is Tanner Laczynski better on his strong side?
Almost every centre is. The strong/weak split above compares his win rate on his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots) with his weak-side dots. League-wide, strong-side takers win about 52.6% and weak-side takers about 44.9%.