NHL Goalie Losses Leaders 2024-25

Leaders: Losses, 2024-25

1stJuuse SarosNSH · 58 GP31Share
2ndIgor ShesterkinNYR · 61 GP29Share
3rdJeremy SwaymanBOS · 58 GP29Share
4thAlexandar GeorgievSJS/COL · 49 GP26Share
5thSamuel MontembeaultMTL · 62 GP24Share
6thIlya SorokinNYI · 61 GP24Share
7thUkko-Pekka LuukkonenBUF · 55 GP24Share
8thJoey DaccordSEA · 57 GP23Share
9thLukas DostalANA · 54 GP23Share
10thKarel VejmelkaUTA · 58 GP22Share

The full ranked table, with filters, follows.

What Losses measures

This board ranks NHL goalies by losses, regular season only. Pick any season back to 2017-18 above the table. Regulation losses charged, regular season (overtime losses in OTL).

Losses are a team and workload stat: the busiest starters on bad teams top it.

A regulation loss is charged to the goalie in net for the goal that decides the game; overtime and shootout losses are counted separately (OTL). A few leagues score losses as a negative. High totals usually mean heavy usage on a weak team rather than poor play. In 2024-25, 103 goalies qualify for this board; the median is 9 and Juuse Saros leads at 31.

Losses leaderboard

Season2026-27 2025-26 2024-25 2023-24

Older seasons

2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18

Show

NHL Goalie Losses Leaders, 2024-25, All situations
#	Goalie	Team	L	GP	GS	W	OTL	SV%	Pctl
1	Juuse SarosNSH	NSH	31	58	58	20	6	0.896	100	85%
2	Igor ShesterkinNYR	NYR	29	61	61	27	5	0.905	99	62%▼5.9
3	Jeremy SwaymanBOS	BOS	29	58	58	22	7	0.892	99	97%▲0.8
4	Alexandar GeorgievSJS/COL	SJS/COL	26	49	47	15	4	0.875	97	—
5	Samuel MontembeaultMTL	MTL	24	62	60	31	7	0.902	95	13%▼0.8
6	Ilya SorokinNYI	NYI	24	61	60	30	6	0.907	95	97%
7	Ukko-Pekka LuukkonenBUF	BUF	24	55	55	24	5	0.887	95	67%▲1
8	Joey DaccordSEA	SEA	23	57	55	27	5	0.906	93	65%▼2.5
9	Lukas DostalANA	ANA	23	54	49	23	7	0.903	93	82%▼1.1
10	Karel VejmelkaUTA	UTA	22	58	55	26	8	0.904	91	98%
11	Jordan BinningtonSTL	STL	22	56	54	28	5	0.900	91	25%▼1.8
12	Mackenzie BlackwoodCOL/SJS	COL/SJS	21	56	53	28	6	0.912	88	92%▲0.8
13	Elvis MerzlikinsCBJ	CBJ	21	53	52	26	5	0.892	88	7.3%
14	Petr MrazekCHI/DET	CHI/DET	21	38	38	12	2	0.891	88	0.1%
15	Andrei VasilevskiyTBL	TBL	20	63	63	38	5	0.921	86	99%
16	Filip GustavssonMIN	MIN	19	58	58	31	6	0.914	84	60%▼1
17	Sergei BobrovskyFLA	FLA	19	54	54	33	2	0.906	84	84%▼1.2
18	Cam TalbotDET	DET	19	47	43	21	5	0.901	84	9.2%▲2.6
19	Jake OettingerDAL	DAL	18	58	58	36	4	0.909	81	99%
20	Stuart SkinnerEDM	EDM	18	51	50	26	4	0.896	81	67%▲5.3
21	Arvid SoderblomCHI	CHI	18	36	33	10	7	0.898	81	4.8%▼0.8
22	Samuel ErssonPHI	PHI	17	47	45	22	5	0.883	79	8.9%▼1.6
23	Philipp GrubauerSEA	SEA	17	26	26	8	1	0.875	79	23%▲7.6
24	Dustin WolfCGY	CGY	16	53	53	29	8	0.910	75	51%▼3.6
25	Jacob MarkstromNJD	NJD	16	49	49	26	6	0.900	75	88%▼4.1
26	Pyotr KochetkovCAR	CAR	16	47	47	27	3	0.898	75	73%▲19
27	Spencer KnightFLA/CHI	FLA/CHI	16	38	36	17	3	0.902	75	73%
28	Jake AllenNJD	NJD	16	31	29	13	1	0.908	75	51%▼2.8
29	Kevin LankinenVAN	VAN	15	51	49	25	10	0.902	72	18%▼4.1
30	Alex NedeljkovicPIT	PIT	15	38	35	14	5	0.894	72	21%▲4.5
31	Justus AnnunenNSH/COL	NSH/COL	15	34	29	15	1	0.883	72	9.7%▼0.8
32	Linus UllmarkOTT	OTT	14	44	43	25	3	0.910	68	92%▲3
33	Joseph WollTOR	TOR	14	42	41	27	1	0.909	68	37%▼2.7
34	Charlie LindgrenWSH	WSH	14	39	38	20	3	0.896	68	12%
35	David RittichLAK	LAK	14	34	31	16	2	0.887	68	4.0%
36	Vitek VanecekSJS/FLA	SJS/FLA	14	25	24	5	4	0.884	68	0.1%▼3.1
37	Adin HillVGK	VGK	13	50	50	32	5	0.906	64	38%▲11
38	Ivan FedotovPHI	PHI	13	26	24	6	4	0.880	64	—
39	Connor HellebuyckWPG	WPG	12	63	62	47	3	0.925	62	91%▼0.7
40	Tristan JarryPIT	PIT	12	36	35	16	6	0.893	62	26%
41	Anton ForsbergOTT	OTT	12	30	27	11	3	0.901	62	19%▼2
42	Darcy KuemperLAK	LAK	11	50	50	31	7	0.922	59	46%▼5.1
43	Dan VladarCGY	CGY	11	30	29	12	6	0.898	59	59%▼2.8
44	John GibsonANA	ANA	11	29	28	11	2	0.912	59	60%▼4.1
45	Calvin PickardEDM	EDM	10	36	31	22	1	0.900	55	3.3%▼0.8
46	Joonas KorpisaloBOS	BOS	10	27	24	11	3	0.893	55	12%
47	James ReimerBUF/ANA	BUF/ANA	10	24	21	10	2	0.897	55	—
48	Eric ComrieWPG	WPG	10	20	20	9	1	0.914	55	0.1%
49	Daniil TarasovCBJ	CBJ	10	20	19	7	2	0.881	55	21%▲9.2
50	Alex LyonDET	DET	9	30	26	14	1	0.896	50	29%▼2.1