Edgehalla

Draw Duel

Gage Goncalves faceoff stats, 2025-26

TBL · C · Left shot · full player page

Model rating

—

Only 35 draws in the last four seasons: too few for a rating.

2025-26 FO%

30.4%

7 won of 23 (regular season)

Strong / weak side

27.3% / 25.0%

11 strong-side, 8 weak-side draws this season

Next game

0.2 FOW

2026-10-05 vs PHI: 1 draws at 39.6%, range 0–1

Where Goncalves wins draws

Win % at every dot, 2026-27 and 2025-26 regular season, in his own attacking direction.

— · 6— · 4— · 1— · 1— · 4— · 1— · 2— · 3— · 2
Offensive zone at the right, his left at the top. Warm = above 50%, cool = below; bigger circles = more draws. Hollow circles have under 10 draws.
Show as a table
Gage Goncalves faceoff win % by dot
DotDrawsWonFO%
OZ left6350.0%
OZ right4125.0%
NZ left (att.)100.0%
NZ right (att.)100.0%
Centre4250.0%
NZ left (def.)100.0%
NZ right (def.)2150.0%
DZ left300.0%
DZ right200.0%

Toughest and easiest opponents

Model win % against today's regular centres, averaged over home and road and every dot. This is a prediction, not his record.

Toughest

Easiest

Splits by season

Faceoff win % by season and situation, with draws taken.
SeasonAllEVPPPKOZNZDZStrongWeak
2026-270.0% 10.0% 1— 0— 0— 00.0% 1— 0— 00.0% 1
2025-2630.4% 2331.8% 22— 00.0% 140.0% 1037.5% 80.0% 527.3% 1125.0% 8
2024-2550.0% 650.0% 6— 0— 040.0% 5— 0100.0% 150.0% 6— 0
2023-240.0% 10.0% 1— 0— 0— 00.0% 1— 0— 00.0% 1
Playoffs (all)25.0% 425.0% 4— 0— 00.0% 20.0% 1100.0% 1100.0% 10.0% 2

Small numbers are draws taken. Strong = his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots, in his own attacking direction); centre-ice draws count in neither.

Head-to-head, last three seasons

Raw records against his most frequent opponents next to what the model expected at the dots they actually met at. The blended number moves the model toward the record by n / (n + 500), because pair-specific edges are tiny (about ±2 points) and most of a lopsided record is luck.

Head-to-head faceoff records with model expectation and shrunk estimate.
OpponentRecordRawModelBlendedUnusual?
Luke Kunin1–150.0%39.6%39.7%normal luck (z 0.3)
Colton Sissons1–150.0%33.9%34.0%normal luck (z 0.5)
Phillip Danault0–20.0%26.6%26.5%normal luck (z -0.9)
Nic Dowd1–150.0%37.2%37.2%normal luck (z 0.4)
Samuel Helenius0–10.0%36.7%36.7%normal luck (z -0.8)
Mason McTavish0–10.0%31.9%31.9%normal luck (z -0.7)
Oliver Kapanen0–10.0%42.0%41.9%normal luck (z -0.9)
Marco Kasper1–0100.0%44.3%44.4%a bit unusual (z 1.1)
Leo Carlsson0–10.0%36.5%36.5%normal luck (z -0.8)
Kevin Stenlund1–0100.0%31.4%31.5%a bit unusual (z 1.5)
Ryan McLeod0–10.0%43.7%43.6%normal luck (z -0.9)
Sam Carrick0–10.0%34.7%34.6%normal luck (z -0.7)

Last 10 games

Faceoffs taken and won in his last ten games.
DateOppFOWDrawsFO%
2026-10-03vs WSH010.0%
2026-05-03vs MTL010.0%
2026-05-01@ MTL010.0%
2026-04-29vs MTL010.0%
2026-03-31vs MTL010.0%
2026-03-24vs MIN010.0%
2026-03-12vs DET11100.0%
2026-02-05vs FLA010.0%
2026-01-16@ STL010.0%
2026-01-12@ PHI010.0%

Projected faceoffs won

  • 2026-10-05 vs PHI likely opponents: Christian Dvorak (36%), Noel Acciari (36%)0.2 FOW 0–1
  • 2026-10-08 vs MIN likely opponents: Joel Eriksson Ek (42%), Ryan Hartman (42%)0.2 FOW 0–1
  • 2026-10-10 vs NYI likely opponents: Bo Horvat (34%), Jean-Gabriel Pageau (30%)0.2 FOW 0–1

FAQ

What is Gage Goncalves's faceoff percentage?

The season line above shows Gage Goncalves's raw faceoff wins and percentage this season. The model rating beside it is his expected win rate against an average regular centre at a neutral dot, adjusted for opponents, home ice and dot side, with a 90% interval.

How many faceoffs will Gage Goncalves win tonight?

When Gage Goncalves has a game scheduled, the projection above gives expected draws, expected win rate against tonight's likely opposing centres, and a 10th–90th percentile range of faceoffs won. Projections update nightly.

Is Gage Goncalves better on his strong side?

Almost every centre is. The strong/weak split above compares his win rate on his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots) with his weak-side dots. League-wide, strong-side takers win about 52.6% and weak-side takers about 44.9%.