Who to start · 2026-27

Gabriel Landeskog vs Trevor Zegras

SteadyixG/60 2.38 (was 1.24)
Falling1 P in last 5 (0.80/GP before)

In 2026-27, Gabriel Landeskog scored 1.65 fantasy points per game under ESPN default scoring to Trevor Zegras's 1.58.

Landeskog had 13 points in 21 games; Zegras had 15 in 22 games.

This week Landeskog has no games left; Zegras has 1 left with 1 tough matchup. In ESPN default points scoring we project Zegras for 1.3 to Landeskog's 0.0 over the games left.

Gabriel Landeskog has the better number in 18 of the 34 stats both are ranked on.

Landeskog's biggest edges: Expected goals 58.9%, Sequence xG 57.7%, Scoring chances 55.6%.

Zegras's biggest edges: Transition attempts /60 1.34, Ascension score 61, Ice time per game 18:24.

In standard categories (G, A, +/-, PPP, SOG, HIT), the default in Who Should I Start, Gabriel Landeskog rates ahead, -0.7 to -0.8 in summed category z-scores.

Role trend over the last 5 games: Landeskog is steady, ixG/60 2.38 (was 1.24); Zegras is falling, 1 P in last 5 (0.80/GP before).

  • • Landeskog, last 10 games (Oct 25–Nov 14): 4 G, 2 A, 2 PPP, 16 SOG.
  • • Zegras, last 10 games (Oct 24–Nov 14): 2 G, 5 A, 4 PPP, 22 SOG.

Colorado Avalanche · Philadelphia Flyers · Who should I start? · Compare other players

Fantasy value: your scoring

Gabriel Landeskog

-0.7

category z-score total

Trevor Zegras

-0.8

category z-score total

Under Standard (6 categories), Gabriel Landeskog has the edge (Landeskog wins 3, Zegras wins 3 of 6 categories).

Per-stat breakdown under Standard (6 categories)
CategoryLandeskogZegras
Goals / game0.380.23
Assists / game0.240.45
Plus/minus / game-0.14-0.36
Power-play points / game0.140.32
Shots on goal / game1.482.09
Hits / game1.480.32

Per-game rates from the selected sample; blended mixes last season with this season, weighting this season more as games are played. Categories are scored as z-scores against qualified players at the same position. Your scoring choice is shared with Who Should I Start: saved on this device, and on your account when you are signed in.

Head-to-head: Landeskog vs Zegras

Every event between them in NHL play-by-play, 2020-21 to 2026-27: games against each other, faceoffs, shots on goal, hits and penalties. Regular season and playoffs.

LandeskogZegras
5Team record in 6 meetings1
3Points in those games5

Landeskog 0G 3A, 12 SOG · Zegras 0G 5A, 11 SOG

On the ice against each other (Landeskog's side)

3:52 at 5-on-5 over 1 games, 2025-26, from Landeskog's side

Shot attempts
5–12
29.4%
Expected goals
0.0–0.6
6.9%
Goals
0–1

Games against each other

Games between Gabriel Landeskog and Trevor Zegras
DateScoreLandeskogZegras
2026-10-19COL 2–3 PHI0G 0A 0S0G 3A 3S
2025-12-07COL 3–2 PHI0G 0A 2S0G 0A 2S
2022-01-19COL 2–0 ANA0G 0A 1S0G 0A 2S
2021-11-24COL 5–2 ANA0G 2A 4S0G 1A 0S
2021-03-16COL 8–4 ANA0G 1A 2S0G 1A 3S
2021-03-05COL 3–2 ANA0G 0A 3S0G 0A 1S

Faceoffs: Landeskog vs Zegras

Model: Gabriel Landeskog wins 61.1% of draws against Trevor Zegras on average (L shot vs L shot). Same-handed, so the dot decides who is on his strong side; the gap between the left and right dots is the real matchup.

Gabriel Landeskog's predicted win % against Trevor Zegras at each dot, in Landeskog's attacking direction, at home and on the road.
Landeskog atOZ leftOZ rightNZ left (att.)NZ right (att.)CentreNZ left (def.)NZ right (def.)DZ leftDZ right
Home66%55%67%56%62%67%56%68%57%
Road65%54%66%55%61%66%55%67%56%

They have not faced each other on a draw in the seasons we track.

Landeskog faceoffs · Zegras faceoffs · how the model works

Every stat, side by side

Season values; bars are percentiles at each player's position (longer is better). Click a stat for its explainer.

LandeskogZegras

Fantasy box score

Transition, turnovers & faceoffs, Usage, Special teams & discipline, Luck & trend, NHL EDGE tracking continue below

Every stat, side by side (continued)

LandeskogZegras

Special teams & discipline

This week's schedule

Nov 9 to Nov 15. More games usually wins a weekly start/sit. Chips show how many fantasy points the opponent allows to the player's position (soft or tough), the Schedule Edge from rest and travel, and the likely opposing goalie with his save percentage. Projections cover the games left: Edgehalla's rest-of-season rates per game, adjusted for each opponent's scoring allowed, in ESPN default points.

Scored in ESPN default points (G 2, A 1, PPP 0.5, SHP 0.5, SOG 0.1, HIT 0.1, BLK 0.5). Use your league's scoring

Colorado Avalanche logo

Gabriel Landeskog

3games (0 left)

0.0proj. ESPN default pts

Philadelphia Flyers logo

Trevor Zegras

4games (1 left)

1.3proj. ESPN default pts

  • Mon, Nov 9 @ VANB2B
    Opp allows the most FP to CSchedule edge −9.3 win%Likely vs Leevi Meriläinen (.885)
  • Wed, Nov 11 @ EDM
    Opp allows 4th-fewest FP to CLikely vs Tristan Jarry (.908)
  • Sat, Nov 14 @ CBJ
    Opp allows 9th-most FP to CLikely vs Jet Greaves (.875)
  • Sun, Nov 15 vs EDMB2B1.3 pts
    Opp allows 4th-fewest FP to CLikely vs Tristan Jarry (.908)

Player data stories

How the game changed, told through the numbers.

All NHL data stories

FAQ

Should I start Gabriel Landeskog or Trevor Zegras in fantasy hockey?
In 2026-27, Gabriel Landeskog scored 1.65 fantasy points per game under ESPN default scoring to Trevor Zegras's 1.58. Landeskog had 13 points in 21 games; Zegras had 15 in 22 games. Check this week's games and your league's scoring in the fantasy panel above, since more games usually decide a weekly start.
Who is better, Gabriel Landeskog or Trevor Zegras?
On 2026-27 numbers, Gabriel Landeskog leads in 18 of 34 stats where both qualify, from scoring and power-play production to on-ice shot share and NHL EDGE tracking.
How have Landeskog and Zegras done against each other?
In 6 games against each other in our data, Landeskog's team went 5–1. Landeskog had 3 points (0 goals) and Zegras had 5 (0 goals).

2026-27 regular season from NHL play-by-play, shift charts and NHL EDGE, processed by Edgehalla. Head-to-head covers every loaded season (play-by-play from 2019-20; on-ice matchups from 2025-26).Compare other players →