Edgehalla

Draw Duel

Jonathan Toews faceoff stats, 2025-26

WPG · C · Left shot · full player page

Model rating

57.8%

90%: 55.5%–60.2% vs an average regular, on 1,026 draws since 2023-24

2025-26 FO%

62.1%

637 won of 1026 (regular season)

Strong / weak side

69.4% / 48.1%

546 strong-side, 295 weak-side draws this season

Next game

7.6 FOW

2026-10-04 vs DET: 12 draws at 61.0%, range 4–12

Where Toews wins draws

Win % at every dot, 2025-26 regular season, in his own attacking direction.

68% · 34841% · 10579% · 2463% · 3063% · 18576% · 2958% · 1970% · 14549% · 141
Offensive zone at the right, his left at the top. Warm = above 50%, cool = below; bigger circles = more draws. Hollow circles have under 10 draws.
Show as a table
Jonathan Toews faceoff win % by dot
DotDrawsWonFO%
OZ left34823768.1%
OZ right1054341.0%
NZ left (att.)241979.2%
NZ right (att.)301963.3%
Centre18511662.7%
NZ left (def.)292275.9%
NZ right (def.)191157.9%
DZ left14510169.7%
DZ right1416948.9%

Toughest and easiest opponents

Model win % against today's regular centres, averaged over home and road and every dot. This is a prediction, not his record.

Toughest

Easiest

Splits by season

Faceoff win % by season and situation, with draws taken.
SeasonAllEVPPPKOZNZDZStrongWeak
2025-2662.1% 102662.7% 82461.9% 16847.1% 3461.8% 45365.2% 28759.4% 28669.4% 54648.1% 295

Small numbers are draws taken. Strong = his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots, in his own attacking direction); centre-ice draws count in neither.

Head-to-head, last three seasons

Raw records against his most frequent opponents next to what the model expected at the dots they actually met at. The blended number moves the model toward the record by n / (n + 500), because pair-specific edges are tiny (about ±2 points) and most of a lopsided record is luck.

Head-to-head faceoff records with model expectation and shrunk estimate.
OpponentRecordRawModelBlendedUnusual?
Frank Nazar16–672.7%62.8%63.2%normal luck (z 1.0)
Nazem Kadri18–385.7%67.5%68.2%a bit unusual (z 1.8)
Marco Rossi8–753.3%60.1%59.9%normal luck (z -0.5)
Kevin Stenlund9–660.0%54.8%55.0%normal luck (z 0.4)
Anze Kopitar6–940.0%53.9%53.5%a bit unusual (z -1.1)
Morgan Frost11–378.6%58.4%58.9%a bit unusual (z 1.5)
Chandler Stephenson7–750.0%58.2%57.9%normal luck (z -0.6)
Ryan Greene5–935.7%66.4%65.6%unusual (z -2.4)
Danila Yurov10–471.4%70.6%70.6%normal luck (z 0.1)
Sean Couturier8–657.1%45.0%45.3%normal luck (z 0.9)
Nico Sturm4–930.8%51.9%51.4%a bit unusual (z -1.5)
Phillip Danault7–653.8%55.0%54.9%normal luck (z -0.1)

Last 10 games

Faceoffs taken and won in his last ten games.
DateOppFOWDrawsFO%
2026-04-16vs SJS162369.6%
2026-04-14@ UTA142166.7%
2026-04-13@ VGK151883.3%
2026-04-11vs PHI101758.8%
2026-04-09@ STL4666.7%
2026-04-06vs SEA131776.5%
2026-04-04@ CBJ040.0%
2026-04-02@ DAL3560.0%
2026-03-31@ CHI61250.0%
2026-03-28@ COL91464.3%

Projected faceoffs won

  • 2026-10-04 vs DET likely opponents: Andrew Copp (57%), J.T. Compher (60%)7.6 FOW 4–12
  • 2026-10-05 vs PIT likely opponents: Sidney Crosby (53%), Ben Kindel (64%)7.6 FOW 4–12
  • 2026-10-07 vs COL likely opponents: Brock Nelson (61%), Nathan MacKinnon (60%)7.8 FOW 4–12
  • 2026-10-09 vs ANA likely opponents: Tim Washe (54%), Mikael Granlund (62%)7.7 FOW 4–12

FAQ

What is Jonathan Toews's faceoff percentage?

The season line above shows Jonathan Toews's raw faceoff wins and percentage this season. The model rating beside it is his expected win rate against an average regular centre at a neutral dot, adjusted for opponents, home ice and dot side, with a 90% interval.

How many faceoffs will Jonathan Toews win tonight?

When Jonathan Toews has a game scheduled, the projection above gives expected draws, expected win rate against tonight's likely opposing centres, and a 10th–90th percentile range of faceoffs won. Projections update nightly.

Is Jonathan Toews better on his strong side?

Almost every centre is. The strong/weak split above compares his win rate on his strong-side dots (a left shot's left dots) with his weak-side dots. League-wide, strong-side takers win about 52.6% and weak-side takers about 44.9%.